FlashForward Still Has Potential, But Can the Show Be Saved?

By Leonard Pierce

Apr 29, 2010

Fans of FlashForward—we know you’re out there—are probably sick of the Lost comparisons. We know that FlashForward's producers are sick of the Lost comparisons (though, really, they have no one to blame but themselves). Frankly, even we critics are sick of the Lost comparisons. But until the show manages to find its own voice and direction, something that seems more unlikely with every episode, we can’t help but notice how similar it is to Lost in every way but being a successful television show.

It’s not as if FlashForward's creators haven’t tried to tinker with the formula a bit. Despite all the juicy sci-fi craziness and conspiratorial enigmas inherent in a show about a global blackout that causes huge segments of the population to catch tantalizing and disturbing visions of the future, FlashForward made a conscious decision early on to switch up the proportions of the Lost recipe, blending some 75 percent angst-ridden soap opera with 25 percent science-fiction mystery. This turned out to be about as appealing as macaroni and cheese made with two ounces of pasta and a gallon of sauce, and is a big reason the show floundered in the early goings.

When FlashForward returned from its midseason hiatus, it promised to shake things up in ways that would satisfy those viewers who'd stuck around while still drawing in new ones. It didn’t exactly succeed, and part of the reason for that was chaos in the writers’ room. No sooner had superhero scribe David S. Goyer, best known as the author of Christopher Nolan’s Batman movies, signed on as showrunner than he resigned the post, leaving it to his wife—and maybe it’s just as well: Judging from the often-hokey dialogue and the overemphasis on explication, we were seeing less of the David Goyer of Batman Begins and The Dark Knight, and more of the David Goyer of Kickboxer 2: The Road Back and Dollman vs. Demonic Toys.

For a show that likes to explain itself so much—often at the risk of the kind of dramatic tension it so badly needs—FlashForward has been slow to dole out the twists. Lost may keep you waiting weeks or even years for a revelation, but at least you know one is coming; FlashForward frequently leaves you wondering if it has any answers, and when they finally arrive, it’s in exposition overload. (Pity poor Gabrielle Union, a fine actress who gets stuck with the brunt of the tell-don’t-show dialogue; if she didn’t get lines explaining what the audience has already figured out, she’d hardly say anything at all.)

And this illuminates one of the biggest problems FlashForward has, one that it’s going to have to address (and soon) if it’s going to avoid cancellation and become the excellent show it still has the potential to be. This is a show that's invested a lot of time and money into its lead characters, and now that a number of them have turned out to be duds, it doesn’t know what to do about them. Joseph Fiennes as Mark Benford is a source of unintended laughs a lot more often than he is the moral center he’s intended to be; Gabrielle Union functions like a human footnote; and Jack Davenport is a portentous mess who just seems to take up space. There aren’t a lot of shows with a supporting cast as strong as this one, which is why it’s such a shame that FlashForward rarely gives them something to do. Sonya Walger, John Cho, and the ever-wonderful Ricky Jay are all terrific actors, but even when they’re given decent scenes, they’re forced to recite hooty dialogue that rarely takes the plot forward.

Still, there’s reason to hope. After its break, FlashForward came roaring back with the “Revelation Zero” two-parter that added new layers of depth to the series’ mythology, gave Dominic Monaghan a more satisfying role, and set up a sequence of events that has depicted Michael Massee’s Dyson Frost in such a sinister light that you wish the whole show was told from his point of view. The introduction of James Callis (Battlestar Galactica’s Dr. Gaius Baltar) was solid, and has given fans something to look forward to. And the spooling out of Christine Woods’ Janice Hawk as a mole has finally given her character some weight and interest.

But in a medium where perception is bigger than reality, there are plenty of people who think FlashForward has run itself into the ground, and the show doesn’t have much time to convince them otherwise. After that gripping two-parter, FlashForward went off the rails again, floundering from one misstep to the next until it crashed during “Better Angels”, an episode that played like a parody of itself. Last week’s “The Garden of Forking Paths” was the best episode we’ve seen in months, and finally moved the show forward in terms of its half-hearted mythology; this week’s “Goodbye Yellow Brick Road” shows promise, and might actually involve the producers making some of the tough decisions they need to make to get viewers involved in the characters’ fates. But with only four episodes left until the season finale, it may be too little too late.

What do you think, FlashForward viewers? Is the show circling the drain—or finally building up steam?

  • Comments (50)
Add a Comment
In reply to :
  • slyguytoo May 05, 2010

    my only concern is where can you go after this season and the problem has been solved? if its called flashforward you can hardly create a new problem that doesnt have to do with flashing forward and if it doesnt then the show makes no sense anymore!

  • grace87 May 05, 2010

    Well.. it's good.. and since it came back from the long winter break it's even better.. it should stay..

  • abelav78 May 03, 2010

    I think Flashforward should stay, its getting better and better , actually getting more intresting.

  • arseblog May 03, 2010

    One of the only shows that I actually look forward to every week out of the other 10+ shows that I watch. But I will never understand why some shows get canceled and others remain. i.e. TSCC axed and Dollhouse remained. That shocked me beyond measure. Flashforward is too good to be anywhere near the axe. Be serious please.

  • zitzitta May 03, 2010

    It's a show I look forward to watch after every episode and that's good enough for me and most people. It should be good enough to those axe-wielding executives, shouldn't it?

  • potter1989 May 03, 2010

    I think it's building up steam, but if they keep the show going at this pace, they won't have anything interesting to show for a second season. (much like lost - boring after 3rd season)

  • StefanFarrugia May 02, 2010

    I can' really understand why all the hoosh hoosh. I really look forward to the next episode which is what a series should do. The series got a bit stuck in the biggining but now the ball is rolling quite well, and satisfying. I find the show and plot enticing!

  • torontogirl98 May 02, 2010

    I really like the show of course its got lots of problems but so far I still like it much in part to the main lead actors who I love

  • Kniv3s Apr 30, 2010

    Circling the drain, but could enter to a second season...

  • VConn Apr 30, 2010

    This is a very good show and it could be great but it was probably screwed before it even started because of the amount of HYPE that went into the who "FF Is the next LOST" promotions - The show had almost insurmountable shoes to fill because of that tag and no-one cares\d how good this show is because for many it isn't as good as LOST Personally I think it's actually better than LOST.

  • See More Comments (40)