|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Poor in the beginning? | 11/17/2007 4:19am
|
|
After re-viewing some of my dvds of the early seasons, I've noticed that the family seems to be eating a lot more in the first seasons comparing to later. In the first season, we watch them have breakfast, dinner and many other meals, prettyoften. However, it's like the producers would like to turn them into lookingeven more poor as they got into the series. With a completely empty frig and so on. Anybody ells who noticed that?
|
|
You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
|
|
|
|
|
2. Re: Poor in the beginning? | 11/17/2007 8:07am
|
|
My guess is: at the beginning, they were trying to make them seem like a normal Chicago family, with a miserable life. It stays that way throughout. However, those features become far more exaggerated as the series goes along, until it's practically a cartoon.
|
|
You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
|
|
|
Cjb2442
Level 4
Thighmaster
Posts: 58
|
3. Re: Poor in the beginning? | 12/01/2007 9:33pm
|
|
Yea it was poor in the begining and just plain sucked near the end seson 5 is the best season
|
|
You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
|
|
|
ymike673
Level 11
Red Shirted Lt.
Posts: 957
|
4. Re: Poor in the beginning? | 12/10/2007 5:10am
|
|
The first few seasons were less campy. Peggy cooked meals and Kelly really didn't dress like a slut all the time. In fact Al was more likely to have sex with Peggy at a drop of a hat the first few seasons than in the later ones. The show was always funny but after a while the writers turned it into a "live-action" cartoon.
|
|
You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
|
|
|
Kadodian
Level 15
Ginsu Knife
Posts: 4,213
|
5. Re: Poor in the beginning? | 01/15/2008 5:28am
|
|
I think the first three seasons were the best !!!!
|
|
You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
|
|
|
buffyjl
Level 17
The Crazy Neighbor
Posts: 5,217
|
6. Re: Poor in the beginning? | 01/24/2008 11:40am
|
It's also funny how in the 1st episode Al had an Italian accent. 
|
Edited on 01/24/2008 11:40am
|
You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
|
|
|
|
|
7. Re: Poor in the beginning? | 02/17/2008 10:41am
|
|
In the beginning mwc was meant to be an sitcom that pushed the limits so they made the bundys into an "I love my family but I dont want to be an around them 24 hours a day" kind of family but later on they changed and made the bundys into an poor family. Married With Children changed about three times during their run but I love every season very much and wished they would have kept the feeling they has during the first season.
|
|
You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
|
|
|
|
|
8. Re: Poor in the beginning? | 04/26/2008 9:25am
|
|
The first three seasons were the most consistent. The only thing that improved in later seasons was the addition of Ted McGinley. Jefferson was a better character than Steve.
|
|
You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
|
|
|
|
|
9. Re: Poor in the beginning? | 05/01/2008 11:35pm
|
| Scandal2000 wrote: | | The first three seasons were the most consistent. The only thing that improved in later seasons was the addition of Ted McGinley. Jefferson was a better character than Steve. |
I agree. I think Jefferson made the show funny.
|
|
You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
|
|
|
|
|
10. Re: Poor in the beginning? | 05/01/2008 11:36pm
|
| Cjb2442 wrote: | | Yea it was poor in the begining and just plain sucked near the end seson 5 is the best season |
I thought they had a really expensive Bi-Level house for being poor.
|
|
You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
|
|
|
|
|
11. Re: Poor in the beginning? | 05/27/2008 6:14am
|
yea i say the show was slow at first but when time went on that was when the show was getting more funny
|
|
You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
|
|
|
You must be registered and logged in to post a message in the forum.
|
|
|
