Gina Rodriguez and Aziz Ansari Are Among Time's 100 Most Influential People

The annual Time 100 Most Influential People list issue hit newsstands—and the Internet—on Thursday. And in entertainment, at least, the list reflects the diversity Hollywood has been actively working on growing over the past few years, especially on television.

Featured TV stars include Jane the Virgin's Gina Rodriguez, Master of None mastermind Aziz Ansari, Quantico star Priyanka Chopra, Empire's Taraji P. Henson, reality star Caitlyn Jenner and Melissa McCarthy—who is still on Mike & Molly, at least for another few weeks.

In fact, there are only two white men from creative fields on the list: Leonardo DiCaprio, and video game vlogger Felix "PewDiePie" Kjellberg. The exclusion of white men like George Clooney, Matt Damon, or Eddie Redmayne is a surprising editorial choice, but a bold and much needed one.

This past year has been about changing Hollywood from the inside out, and the diversity of the list feels more like a natural reflection of the demographic sea change in progress, rather than a "no white dudes allowed" political statement.

Writing about Gina Rodriguez for the "Pioneers" section of the list, legendary actress and singer Rita Moreno praised the Jane the Virgin star for her hard-earned confidence, writing, "Whenever she talks about herself or about being Hispanic, she's sending the message 'I deserve this, I work very hard, and I'm a good person.'"

"Caitlyn [knew] the consequences of coming out," writes transgender activist Wayne Maines in his capsule on Caitlyn Jenner, also for the "Pioneers" section. "Because no matter where you come from, how famous you might be or how much money you have, letting America see you in such a vulnerable way is daring and admirable—not self-serving."

But it's not all about what each person signifies for the group they belong to, either. It's also about being allowed to not have to speak for an entire group of people and just tell one's own experience, like Aziz Ansari, who is praised by Broad City's Abbi Jacobson and Ilana Glazer for Master of None's exceptional specificity of point-of-view.

Take a look at the full list, which also includes Hamilton genius Lin-Manuel Miranda, basketball game-changer Steph Curry and Creed director Ryan Coogler, among dozens more, over at Time.


This article originally appears on TV Guide.com.

Comments (9)
Submit
Sort: Latest | Popular
Apr 22, 2016
Gina Rodriguez? Really. After that award show where she looked more like one the top most under the influence.
And as much as I like Ansari, one show of his own that wasn't all that? Please.
Reply
Flag
Apr 22, 2016
Sadly, none of these people actually matter in human history and only prove that Time Magazine's Influential list is clearly nothing more than promoting the status quo of fame.

Shouldn't this list have scientists, mathematicians, real artists and of course Philosophers (just because I am one) on it? I mean really being a second rate actor or actress shouldn't make you eligible-- even if your from an marginalized minority group. Call me crazy but shouldn't you actually be good at what you do.

Oh, right I fought this is America-- we make people influential and famous for being nothing more than rich and clueless! Welcome to the end times. I plan on watching the fall of the United States from Space.
1
Reply
Flag
Apr 22, 2016
I would make the argument that scientists, mathematicians and philosophers didn't have much impact on 2015. When the Higgs Boson particle was proven to exist, when The Large Hadron Collider was built at CERN, and even Neil Degrasse Tyson hosting Cosmos in 2014 have been mentioned before. Furthermore, what does "real artist" mean? Who are these fake artists that you seem to have such a problem with?
Reply
Flag
Apr 22, 2016
Apocalyptic viewing from your futuristic space vehicle... Sure, you're stable; and your opinion merits consideration.....Sure, Ok. Haven't you proved the opposite of your point.
Reply
Flag
Apr 21, 2016
Why is it that people don't think someone like Pewdiepie deserve to be on the list?

The guy is a cultural phenomenon. Don't get me wrong, I never even heard of the guy until the south park episode, but the guy put the whole trying to be a youtube star into the mindset of so many people - which is exactly what the notion of being "influential" is all about.

Yes, he didn't cure cancer or anything. But so what?
The list isn't "greatest contribution to society", it's about people who affected society.

Would people object to someone like Paris Hilton, who was clearly a cultural icon being on the list?
2
Reply
Flag
Apr 22, 2016
We should be ashamed that vapid waste of breath like Paris Hilton has any affect on society other than to strive to be nothing like her.So yes I vehemently oppose her or any entertainer being on the list as the list should be reserved for people making a plausible contribution to humanity and not a 65 year old guy who puts on a dress and calls himself Caitlyn.
Reply
Flag
Apr 21, 2016
A large number of the people on the list deserved to be there. Pewdiepie is NOT one of them.
Reply
Flag
Apr 21, 2016
The list was a joke considering it had Pewdiepie on it.
2
Reply
Flag