Lights: On Off
On CNET: Sony still losing on every PS3 it sells
Friday 10:00 PM on CBS

Episode Score

 
9.1 Superb
147 votes

Your Score

Air Date

Friday March 9, 2007

Production Code

318

Episode Summary

Several area murders seem to be tied to voter fraud. Don, Charlie, and the team must find the killers before they strike again.

  •  
    8 Great

    A few things that erked me... hide show

    I had some issues with this episode, which is why I didn't rate it as high. Like what was the deal with the flash drive in the watch? Someone happens to mention, while looking at a pen, that all kinds of devices have flash drives in them. So they happen to find one in her watch? What are the odds of that? I bet Charlie could tell us...

    In this show, the little guy, Oswald also has a "analoguous moment" (my own dictionary) where we get to see an illustration of his explanation with the wine glasses which had previously only been afforded to Charlie, and once for Amita.

    What was with the showdown of staring between Don and Tuttle? it was a hokey "Guy driving by slowly and lowering his window" while Don was lowering his sunglasses for a "Staring Showdown". It was a tad cheap.

    Do you agree?
      0 0
    Report Abuse
  •  
    7.7 Good

    Review hide show

    Nothing happened of importance in this episode. A couple of cool special effects when people were dying, but nothing big as far as story advancement. I wasnt all interested in the case and I thought this was a horrible episode to follow "One Hour", clearly the best episode of numbers ever. The acting was solid, I just didnt like the writing. There final capture was something that you could have seen coming, so even that didnt make up for the filler epsiode. I cant even get this review to one hundred words, I needed this final sentence to even make it there.

    Do you agree?
      0 0
    Report Abuse
  •  
    7.5 Good

    Charlie and Don investigate Richard Tuttle, a wealthy billionare who is the prime suspect in a group of murders. hide show

    An let's get the rich person whose done a lot of horrible things episode.

    Charlie in the beginning gets a visit from a friend who gives him a list of people who mysteriously died. She ends
    up dying herself and Charlie knows this isn't a coincedence.

    He can't uncover the connection behind the deaths until Don and the team focus their attention on a billionare named Richard Tuttle. It seems all the people that died all worked for the person even though he says he never met them all.

    Later, we see the facts and what Tuttle is hiding. It was a decent episode straightforward to the end.

    I didn't care too much about this Oswald character though. He didn't do anything in this episode and was just there as comic relief basically.

    If there going to make a recurring character they need to make him more complicated than just a deadbeat kid whose very smart.

    They didn't really explain Megan's absence in the end but it surely will be explained near the end of the season.

    Do you agree?
      0 1
    Report Abuse
  •  
    9.2 Superb

    Great show about up to date issues. hide show

    I love this episode. Bringing back the old troubled character was genius, and could lead to more episodes for him. He plays off Charlie well. The topic of electronic voting machine tapering was well discussed, and handled. Even if you don't believe it is happening in real life, the idea of it made a great program. Charlie did a wonderful job of explaining different aspects of math theory as usual, and I really enjoyed his interaction with his boss, and the kid he was trying to convince to come to his college. They did a great job of hiding the actress who does Megan's real life pregnancy. I will miss her while she is gone to have the baby. I can't wait to see Megan and Larry back together on the show.

    Do you agree?
      2 0
    Report Abuse
  •  
    2 Terrible

    A poor bit about an election fraud coupled with a series of murders. hide show

    It's obvious the writer and the director were new to this job. The camera shots were cliche, the dialogue was awful, and this episode made talented actors appear inexperienced. It is a sad day when good characters are given terrible material and having to work with a weak director. It forces them into the obvious, over-acting. Poor wirter, weak director. Great piece for a film class to learn from: what not to do. Judd Hirsch was the only redeaming light in the entire episode. Hopefully next week's episode will show more talent and creativity, and leave the writer and director of this episode behind.

    Do you agree?
      1 9
    Report Abuse
 
See All Reviews

Episode Cast and Crew

View All
  • Math used in this episode:
    Brute Force Search Organizational Theory
    Bootstrap Statistical Technique []
  • Opening Numb3rs:
    58 COUNTIES
    53 DISTRICTS
    25,090 PRECINCTS
    1 CANDIDATE []
  • International Air Dates:
    Australia: August 21, 2007 on Ten
    The Netherlands: October 8, 2007 on Veronica
    Germany: February 10, 2008 on SAT 1
    New Zealand: October 26, 2008 on TV3
    Czech Republic: July 17, 2009 on TV Nova []
  • This episode is rated: TV-PG-LV. []
  • Megan: How was she when you last spoke to her?
    Stacy Aliano: Distracted. But, that's Jane. One of those brilliant people processing four things at once.
    Megan: (laughs) I know the type. []
  • Oswald: What are the odds of five people who know each other dying within two weeks?
    Charlie: About 700 million to one. []
  • Alan: Great! Now I have two jaded, world weary sons!
    Don: And this one's got a shrink to prove it. []
More Quotes

Allusions

Click Here
advertisement

Top Contributors

  • khaki_dojo Editor
    User Score 425
  • phf3947 Trusted
    User Score 2280
  • layle1 Trusted
    User Score 222 , Last Online 23 minutes ago
  • scc1fan Retired
    User Score 2377 , Last Online Jan 10, 2010
  • phf3947 Trusted
    User Score 2280
  • LaCholo
    User Score 293
  • John_Q_Public
    User Score 262 , Last Online Dec 31, 1969
  • SrRui
    User Score 209
What is a TV.com Contributor?