I haven't read the novel this episode is based on, but still it was so easy to know who the murderer was. Usually, when Poirot says he knows "who has done it", for a viewer (at least for me) it is not all that clear, but in this case I could tell the killer's name right after the third murder was commited - exactly the same time Poirot realised the truth (statement based on his own words).
As I already said, I haven't read the original material and don't know if it was interesting reading till the end, but the screen time started to feel like a waste 40 minutes before ending.
At the end, when Poirot gives his great speech (he does it every time and it is one of the most exciting moments, but not this time), it is so funny to see how director is trying to make a viewer to sit on the edge of the chair and wonder, who is the murderer, this boy or the other one... Camera is showing one guy's face and then another's. Poirot is standing before one of the suspects and is going to reveal the name of the guilty party and suddenly turns to another - to the guy I knew is guilty for oh so long already. "Wow!" moment is spoiled.
*START OF SPOILER*
Really, Nigel Chapman's guilt in at least one murder was obvious after the phone call he answered from Poirot's apartment. And I think everyone, who watched the episode closely, came to the same conclusion at the same time as did I.
*END OF SPOILER*
This episode is a disappointment, as the most interesting part, the usual Poirot's final speech, is spoiled long before it started.
Though I should mention, that the first part of the episode is great.moreless





