Baby Looney Tunes

Cartoon Network (ended 2005)

Baby Looney Tunes Fan Reviews (70)

Write a Review
7.2
out of 10
Average: Good
486 votes
  • Your Rating: 10
    "Perfect"
  • Your Rating: 9.5
    "Superb"
  • Your Rating: 9
    "Superb"
  • Your Rating: 8.5
    "Great"
  • Your Rating: 8
    "Great"
  • Your Rating: 7.5
    "Good"
  • Your Rating: 7
    "Good"
  • Your Rating: 6.5
    "Fair"
  • Your Rating: 6
    "Fair"
  • Your Rating: 5.5
    "Mediocre"
  • Your Rating: 5
    "Mediocre"
  • Your Rating: 4.5
    "Poor"
  • Your Rating: 4
    "Poor"
  • Your Rating: 3.5
    "Bad"
  • Your Rating: 3
    "Bad"
  • Your Rating: 2.5
    "Terrible"
  • Your Rating: 2
    "Terrible"
  • Your Rating: 1.5
    "Abysmal"
  • Your Rating: 1
    "Abysmal"
Rate Now!
  • Just because it has the Looney Tunes in it,doesn't mean that it will be good.

    3.0
    "Bad"
    The Looney Tunes will forever be the best cartoon ever made. And some spin-offs were great like Tiny Toon Adventures and Duck Dodgers. However,take out all of the comedy and make it a EDUCATIONAL show,and you get Baby Looney Tunes. Baby Looney Tunes is about Bugs,Daffy and more of the characters of the show going on adventures as babies. So,this is basically the Rugrats,but with the Looney Tunes,and boy does this fail. Seriously,instead of blowing each other up and getting injured,they act nice to each other. Why does it have to be an educational show? Why couldn't they just make it a real cartoon? Now,none of the characters act like their normal selves any more,and they are all cry babies. Bugs isn't clever any more,or brave. Daffy is a complete jerk who throws tantrum all the time,and even swears in one episode. Lola isn't eye candy for bunnies any more,Sylvester and Tweety are now friends and there's no "I tought I taw a puddy tat" any more. Taz is now a cry baby who doesn't go crazy again. Floyd is the babysitter and is annoying. Granny doesn't have a squeaky voice any more,and why is she old if they are babies? There are also appearances by Marvin and Foghorn Leghorn. But seriously,where's Porky and Elmer? They are replaced with Porky's daughter Petunia. Seriously,why was she in the show if that's Porky's daughter? She shouldn't even be alive right now. Man,these writers are brain dead. And why not call the babies brats? Because that's what they are. 90% of the show is just them whining and crying all time,like Caillou. Seriously,these are the Looney Tunes? These so-called "adventures" are golfing,finding a lost toy and going to see a child's band. Where are the explosions? Oh right,this is a educational show. The education just sinks below average. It just teaches kids to be brats and throw fights. Thank god this only lasted 4 years,because it sucked. Avoid this and watch the original Looney Tunes.
  • I'd rather watch Loonatics Unleashed than this junk

    1.0
    "Abysmal"
    If there's one thing that ruins a good show,it's turning them even younger. We've had Muppet Babies,A Pup Named Scooby Doo,Flintstone Kids and Tom and Jerry Kids. Now,let's hear about the worst of them all:Baby Looney Tunes. Now,this is the Looney Tunes,and you would expect slapstick,,explosions and crazy cartoon antics.But no,instead,it's aimed at little kids,and we get a crappy excuse for the Looney tunes. The show is about Bugs,Daffy,Lola,Taz,Tweety and Slyvester as babies. Now,the first problem is continuation. Most of the original Looney Tunes like Gossamer,Witch Hazel,Elmer and Yosemite are not even in here. Second of all,the characters act nothing like their normal selves. Bugs is not clever or witty,and is just a big pussy. Daffy is annoying,and is the worst character of the entire show. He is just a selfish brat who whines about everything. Lola is not as independent as she was before. Taz is a huge cry baby who acts like the Cookie Monster. And Tweety and Sylvester are now friends. And plus,these characters always fight all the time,and cry over everything. The plots are just stupid and are always things we've seen before,like trying to give Taz a bath. And there are always parts that just make me say "WTH?". For example,Tweety had to go to the bathroom,and Floyd had to take him. I know she's a baby,but she's a freakin bird,and she could fly! And what's worse is that during the middle of the episode,there's a freakin musical number. And these always have to be filler for the show itself. Overall,this show is such a disgrace to the Looney Tunes. It acts nothing like it,and just feels like you are watching animators rape the cartoons you loved since childhood. If you want a good spin-off,watch Tiny Toon Adventures and Duck Dodgers
  • It really does suck.

    1.2
    "Abysmal"
    Man,this puts the original Looney Tunes to shame i did used to like this show but now i've discovered that it's too babyish and it sucks to watch and Lola Bunny looks a little too much like Tails from the Sonic Merchandise(current one)or Tails might of ripped off her but only she is a girl and has no shoes and Taz is a big baby in this one man don't watch this watch the other good old Looney Tunes this is definitely a baby show and should be cancelled forever!
  • Ahm (Tiny Tunes). When I first heard of Tiny Tunes, I was a bitskeptical. No this is no spoiler to anything. I later liked the idea of my favorite Looney Tune Characters having their own children.Now when I heard about Baby Looney Tunes, I felt that was

    1.0
    "Abysmal"

    a dumb idea.
    First and foremost, how would we know, what Charles M Jones would have even written about? It's better to *not* venture into things we have no way of knowing.

    But A Show on the Original Characters Children, that was a good idea. And actually, I would love to see more done. Their vacation Movie could have been better, but the show as a whole, was really good.

    Why Am I Not Talking About Baby Looney Tunes?
    Because I Avoided watching, feeling it was just degrading to Chuck Jones.

    If anyone has a problem with my strong opinion against it, fine!

  • This is a good show for little kids!

    7.0
    "Good"
    Baby Looney Tunes features all your favorite Looney Toon characters, but they are all a lot younger in this show! They are all toddlers between the ages of 1-6 years old. They have baby themed adventures and they have fun around the house. (Kind of like Rugrats actually.) But each show does have their differences. Well hey me thinks this show is good for little kids to watch and see their favorite chracters do some cool stuff together. Their parents (especially mothers) probably think this is a good learning type of show for them to watch too. As for me, I'm kind of too old to be watching children's shows like this, but hey the last time I saw this show it isn't that bad at all! Good music are at the end of each episode with their own looney tunes spoofs. Its kind of nice seeing the characters in a younger form. That's too bad I don't see this on Cartoon Network anymore, but when this show was on the air there was a lot of FAR worse shows than this. And to me this show wasn't bad, it was pretty good! But sometimes like now, its good to just watch the cool Looney Toons in their regular adult forms! I love Looney Toons!
  • Hmm...This must be good(30 minutes later)Looney Tunes,what have they done to you?

    3.5
    "Bad"
    Now,Looney Tune spin-offs like Tiny Toon Adventures or Duck Dodgers are usally good.However,some idiot decided to turn them in babies.And it failed.Baby Looney Tunes is about the looney Tunes cast members as kids.It should've had explosions or a Road-Runner cartoon.But they didn't because this is an EDUCATIONAL show.For god's sake,they are supposed to entertain us,not to educate us.The education just sucks so hard.The characters have turned to little Caillou's,meaning that they are all cry-babys.Bugs is not Clever,Daffy is a jerk,Lola is not awesome and hot anymore,Taz is a crybaby and Sylvester doesn't try to eat Tweety anymore.Also,why does Granny have to take care of them?And why is she still old?She should've been younger.And where's Porky,Elmer and Yosemite?They should've been in here,but at least they survived from being kid friendly.Also,Floyd is as dumb as well.And back to the character thing,An example would be when Bugs tried to go backstage,but he got scared by the crew.When was he scared for once?But forget that.In conclusion,Baby Looney Tunes is a terrible cartoon that shouldn't have been made
  • used to like it

    6.5
    "Fair"
    when i was younger i liked it, but i do not think i would now obviously, as i am older i have different tastes. also, i only liked the first season, the second with that new male adult character i seriously could have done without. i personally liked this show a lot because i liked seeing them all as babies, but that would probably not be the same if i were ever to watch it again. from what i remember, a B- or so seems right, but if i watched again it might drop a little, so i don't know if i want to see it again
  • Not my Looney Tunes!

    2.0
    "Terrible"
    I'm used to the real crazy versions of the Looney Tunes. The REAL Looney Tunes. Unlike A Pup Named Scooby Doo, The Flinstones Kids, or The Tom and Jerry Kids Show, this is a show with the main characters as babies with 15% of appeal to anyone over six.



    This show put me to sleep the first time I saw it. This show is Looney Tunes in the name only! It's pretty much Cailou mixed with the post 2001 episodes of Rugrats. It has no humor whatsoever.



    If you want to introduce someone to Looney Tunes, introduce them to the real ones and Tiny Toon Adventures!
  • When i saw this show coming up on Cartoon Network

    2.5
    "Terrible"
    I was thinking, oh cool, I'd love to see what the looney tunes characters were like as babies, thinking it would be alot like the original versions, but then i saw it and i was like what is this crap? They turned Daffy into a spoiled brat, the Taz-Manian Devil is such a cry-baby, Lola is a bossy brat, Sylvester is such an attention hog, tweety is boring, and worst of all, Bugs is watered down and weak. In that one episode when Daffy was making fun of Bugs, Bugs gets all hurt over it. The Bugs i remember would've turned around and given Daffy the smackdown instead of acting like a weak little sissy
  • Just because it's aimed at kids does not mean that it should have mocked our beloved Looney Toons

    1.0
    "Abysmal"
    The Looney Toons will always be in my opinion the show that got me interested in cartoons. When I saw it, it always had me laughing and never failed to bring a happy feeling to me. So when I heard of another show of Looney Toons, I was psyched, but only to be really disappointed. Baby Looney Toons is about all the Looney Toons if they were babies, and it's just as bad as it sounds. The artwork and animation is really the only good thing in this show and is decent. All of our favorite Looney Toons act nothing like the ones we grew up watching. Sylvester and Tweety are friends, Bugs is not witty or clever, Lola is not as athletic as we once saw her in Space Jam. The only characters who stayed the same were Taz and Daffey. There is also a huge question to ask when you see the babies. Who is Mellisa and Petunia? When I first saw these characters, I was confused, I never saw them at all in any of the old cartoons and it leaves a big hole as to what happened to them when the grew up. There is also no Porky or Pepe Le Pew at all in this show either. Why? What possible reason could the creators have for not including 2 of the most memorable Looney Toons ever? The plots themselves are just boring. The babies usually discover something new and learn about it at the end. There is absolutely no humor at all in this show, there was not a chuckle or a snicker moment to be found anywhere in this show. Now I know this show is meant for little kids, but it doesn't excuse the fact of how it mocks the Looney Toons. The plots are terrible, there is no humor, and the characters act nothing like the ones that got me into Looney Toons. Stick with the original Looney Toons, not this shameless mess and mockery of a beloved franchise.
  • A pathetic rip off of the original.

    1.1
    "Abysmal"
    Can we say copyright infringement or not a good show? I am so disgusted that they aired this show to make up for Looney Tunes being gone. Well it is not helping out at all. This is pitiful and pathetic. I wish they would cancel this show for good and let it stay cancelled.
  • Tiny Toons vs. Baby Toons

    1.0
    "Abysmal"
    There's a difference between mocking classic shows, and homaging them. This show straddles the line between homaging and beating on the original, and lands on killing the original's reputation, as well as Tiny Toons' rep. Tiny Toons' theme song is even catchier than theirs...



    "We're Tiny, we're Toony, we're all a little Looney! It's Tiny Toon Adventures! Come and join the fun! ...and now our song is done."



    Compare it to this:



    "Hey there everybody, it's a looniful day

    To have a little fun the Baby Looney Tunes way

    It's lots to do at Granny's house

    Games to play and balls to bounce

    And jump and slide and holler Hurray!



    Sylvester, Bugs, and Daffy

    Taz and Lola too

    Tweety's such a sweety

    Now all we need is you



    Hey there everybody, it's a looniful day

    To play the Baby Looney Tunes way!"



    It's catchy too, but it's too saccharinely catchy, unlike Tiny Toons' theme song. I advise fans of either the original or Tiny Toons to stay away from this mess.
  • This show is very bland and forgetable,and clearly made for profit.

    4.0
    "Poor"
    This show is a product of seriouss lack of creativity and a fast way to make more money.The original looney toons are one of the greatest and memorable cartoons in history.The characters were interesting,funny and unique with amazing voice actors.Episodes were well written and cleverly plotted,with beautifull artwork and music.Humor was very witty and apilling to all ages.They had a long run and won many awards.Those were the golden years of cartoons.Lets go back to our time.I dont think there is anything more left to say.Everything nowdays is made for profit.And thats were Baby Looney toons come in.This show is a poor spinoff of the original looney toons.Ofcourse,almost every succesfull cartoon has a spinoff,or even a few.But,i must say that Tiny toons ver awsome and the most underaprreciated cartoons of all time,together with Animaniacs.What makes them so superier to Baby looney toons?They are LOONEY.Baby looney toons are not.They are BORING to the death.Episodes involve around looney toons characters,who are now babies.They live with granny who takes care of them.In every episode they play,then they learn something new, and every episode contains a moderate version of classic nursery rimes.The plot is decent and kid friendly,i have no problem with that.But i have a big problem with characters.Besides babies,they are now compleatly changed in their personality with apsolutley no relation to the original characters.Everyone has a very bland personality,exept Sylvester,who appears to be hypohondrick in this show.But the strangest thing about this show is new characters who were never in the original Looney toons.Who the hell are Melissa and Petunia?Why didnt they add Porky,my favorite Looney toon,besides Daffy.Very weird.The episodes are pretty dull.Yes,its ambed as a kids show,but that doesnt mean that the kids will like it.The humor is awfull and woudldnt even make a toddler giggle.My friends little brother,who is 3,doesnt like this show,but he likes the original.Who can blame him.The wholl show seems to be created by a person who never saw Looney toons episode in his life.Like they just showed him/her apitcure of Looney toons characters,and he/she pitcured them as babies and decided to make show like that.This show has some good moral values,but whats the use if it cant catch toddlers attention.
  • Not so good.

    2.0
    "Terrible"
    "Baby Looney Tunes", well the show is basically all what the name is that's all. It's all- well some of the characters from the regular cartoon as babies, that's right babies. You're probably thinking "awww how cute, well not quite. I haven't paid close attention to any of the episodes so I don't know any goods or bads of this show. I did go through something and I say this show isn't really worth looking at even for kids. I find this show boring, annoying, and even scary, you probably can't imagine how right? Is this an excuse for then to stop showing the original looney tunes show that everyone loves and wants to see because I would rather watch "Rugrats" then this. It does have a few charming parts in it but because of the rest I say "Baby Looney Tunes" would fit perfectly on the horror channel.



    Cartoon Network and Boomerang this has been on TV long enough. Please stop showing this disgrace and bring back the much more descent Looney Tunes back because your not being cute airing this. If you want a lot more kids attention leave it at least to the other spin-offs of the series.



    "Tiny Toon Adventures" all the way.
  • uh......

    6.5
    "Fair"
    Another Looney Tunes spin-off starring the characters as baby form. Baby Looney Tune is mainly about the characters all into baby form, playing around with their cute attention. And their being taken care of from Granny in a baby sitter center. If your a little kid, you might aswell like this poop, if your a hardcore looney tunes fan, your gonna think this show's sh*t. I use to watch this show and think it's a Tiny Tune rip-off. And whenever i watch it, i think "Where is Porky-Pig??" It's like he's a ghost and never appeared in the show. I always tried to find him and all i saw was that fat female bore. And she was shirtless.. Why the hell would CN do this? Did CN tried to make a new version of Tiny Tunes? But this is poop. Overall, this show sucks and especially Petunia.
  • they were better as grown ups....

    3.5
    "Bad"
    this show is boring. i liked the looney tunes when they were grown up. but in this show they're babies?!? i think that this show should've never existed. the plots are lame. CN, take this lame-o show off the air ASAP! if you've seen the original looney tunes, then you might wanna steer clear of this show. it's a good thing it only comes on once a day(in the morning). their voices sound strange,too. i dont like this show.this ends my review on baby looney tunes. xcvbnmsd fghjk sdfg dfghj edrftgyh ujisxwa sdfghj qwerty zxcfvgbhn asdfghj zxcfvbnm sdfghj ertyui sdfghj klfgh
  • It's like Looney Tunes,but for 5-year-olds.

    1.5
    "Abysmal"
    This is just a crappy rip-off of the Looney Tunes! Ok,let's do a comparison here:



    date of Looney Tunes release and production: 1930's to 1960's.



    date of release of THIS: 2002. Hm. Figures.



    I'm not telling fans of this show to stop watching it,but to anyone who may be thinking of watching this for the first time: Go ahead. I won't stop you,but,my advice: Don't. Why CN? Why,would you put this crap on your once-lovely network. This is just total garbage. And who the heck are Petunia and Melissa?! I seriously don't know why it's getting all these good reviews. No offense to the fans of this show.

    -wolvesrule221
  • A very cute 'Looney Tunes' series made for little kids.

    10
    "Perfect"
    Yes, it may not be exremly hilarious like 'Tiny Toon Adventures' nor is it like a usual 'Looney Tunes' series but I think this show is perfect for little kids to enjoy. Each episode has a moral to it just like most little kids' do and should and some of them are meant to help teach kids to behave. All of the charactors are cute lovable in their own ways so it makes it even funner for little kids to watch plus it has music videos of the Baby Looney Tunes with songs based off of popular little kids' songs like 'BINGO', 'London Bridge is Falling Down', etc. Even though I'm not a little kid, I still enjoy watching this tv series and I think it's very cute show. Even though it's a little kids' show, it does still have some parodies to other shows once in a while although it's usually a parody of another little kids' show but it's still kind of funny.
  • what the?????

    1.0
    "Abysmal"
    i hate this show and i have always have and i always will! when i saw this i was like "what the hell is this"? i liked it better when the loony toons were adults but as babies? come on. the characters are annoying as babies and that old women who takes care of the loony toons sucks! this show is not even funny what kind of comedy is this show?



    too me this show is an annoying waste of time and i recommend that you dont watch this show or else youll die of complete boredom.



    atleast they only show this in CN in the morning when im in school. but if they showed this lets say in tonnami or at late at night in Cartoonetwork ill break my TV and throw it out a window.
  • this show is like rugrats...

    8.6
    "Great"
    this show is basically like the looney tunes version of rugrats. looney tunes as babies, discovering new things about life and getting new morals. this shows is pretty much for little kids which is why its shown early in the morning when most people are at skool so i dont know why grown people are complaining about how bad the show is. ill say what i said on my mr.men review ; let the little kids judge it!!!! let it be judged by the people its meant to be judged by sheesh!!! anyways i think this is an ok show as a kids show and it teaches morals that kids should go by to make this place a better world >:O
  • ¢¾¢¾!!The show is okay!!!¢¾¢¾

    10
    "Perfect"
    I think that show is okay because i am 12 years old and it is a lil child show but i watch it with my nephew. It appeared to be a interesting show. When i watch it my favorite characters are tweety bird,taz and lola. But i really like Taz and tweety the most. Also i like how grandma make cookies for everybody.That show is a preschool tv show. Everybody know that it is a lil child show but it is okay for a person of any age to watch this show. That is all from me see ya later....................bye everybody
  • If you realy think ugly things are cute than watch Catscratch.

    2.0
    "Terrible"
    Boomerang is making such a big deal out of this show, they replaced Hamtaro! I love watching Hamtaro, especially every morning when it is on befor school, and now Baby looney Tunes is on. I had to write a review about this, and when I did, I noticed that there are dozens of people allready writing reviews about it. Hamtaro is truly a classic, and just got its hour long time slot, only to be replaced by BLT. I hope they bring Hamtaro Back to its origional time slot. Until then this new show is boring. And mean! that black cat is so mean, Taz cries & everyone can her it. They don't even look like baby, and they don't have dipers on!
  • There are some good and bad things about this here spin-off cartoon.

    5.8
    "Mediocre"
    My 47th review after: "A pup named scooby doo" Which is another spin-off.



    This cartoon is not that Original. This was on the wrong channel. Why does Cartoon Network allow this kind of stuff on their Channel?! First of all, Cartoon network's stupid and they'll allow ANYTHING on their Channel, Inculding Live-action shows. But I'm talking about back in 2002, when Cartoon Network made this bad spin-off, it Insulted the ORIGINAL Looney Tunes. It was SO bad, that over 20 usernames, Ranted about this cartoon and told the world how bad it really was. But there some good and bad things about this toddler show, They should have put it on PBS kids or Cartoon Network should have made another sister channel, Cartoon Network JR! Like they made a Block on Nick, which we all know is Nick jr. This cartoon gets a C-. here the results or whatever.



    Voice-acting: E+ 3.0/10.0 Taz's Voice is Garbage and sucks a Devil's *beep*!!!!!!



    Animation: D 4.0/10.0 The charcthers and backgrounds are Poorly drawn. But the Colors are like an Art House.



    Graphics: E 3.0/10.0 Not what I expected. The graphics are broken, busted and a bit Buggy.



    Sound: C 6.0/10.0 Cutesy Music with classic cartoon sound effects. That is quite fair enough. Dialouge: F-- 0.0/10.0 Worthless, Pointless and Gar-boge!



    Eductional Value: F 2.8/10.0 This dosen't teach kids anything AT ALL. It teaches kids how to thorw Tantrums, Start Fights, EVEN screw up other People's stuff such as, Other kids toys, Computers, Video game consoles (I saw one epiosde called: Pair O' Dice lost, where Daffy and Sylvester fought over the controllers and then they broke the 8-Bit Video game console) and More. That's stupid! The babies are idiots and they play 8-Bit Consoles?! That console they played must be OLD!



    Lasting Appeal: C+ 6.5/10.0 There's an Itty bit of a Lasting Appeal in this poor spin-off. WHO CARES!



    Overall: C- 5.8/10.0 Lots of people happen to hate this cartoon for toddlers and rant it here, The show was a good idea, but it's on the Wrong Channel. This cartoon for the tikes Litteraly came from nowhere and Nobody should watch this for Looney tunes Fans. All right. That's the End of my review for one of Cartoon Network's first AND Lame Toddler shows. Good Night everyone.
  • Creepy Butt-Ugly Monster Lonney Tunes

    2.0
    "Terrible"
    This cartoon is stupid and Unorignal people! Who would want to watch this cat poo garbage? It's better then "Disney's House of Mouse" but this is Still terrbile! Good Lord! I've been reviewing so many Terrbile cartoons and shows and I have been giving them, D's, E's, but mostly, F's!!! This show sucks butt. Now what I am gonig to grade this show....... F--!!!! It Devesres an F--!!!

    Here the Results:



    Voice-acting: F-- 1.6/10.0 What's that? I can't hear you guys! Your voices make my ears pop!!!



    Animation: F-- 2.8/10.0 This what makes the cartoon Terrbile, It's poor drawn, with ugly chracthers! I just want to thorw up all over their faces! That Ugly Monkey thing has the ugliest face in the series!!!!



    Dialouge: F- 2.2/10.0 Terrbile scripts! Even worse then the Animation!!!! I want to smack the chracthers in the faces for saying Stupid Crap!!!!!



    Sound: F-- 1.8/10.0 The music's deaf audio used! Mute the sound at all costs!



    Grapihcs: E+ 3.8/10.0 bad! Bad! B-A-D! the Animation dosen't match with the Grapihcs!



    Lasting Appeal: F-- 0.5/10.0 This show gets really boring and stupid once it's been a while.



    Overall: F-- 2.8/10.0 Another terrbile and Unorignal cartoon by CN. Why would anyone like this? It's stupid! This cartoon is just as bad as My Gym Partner's a Monkey, Squrriel Boy, The Buzz on Maggie band and most Importantly, CatDog. Don't watch those shows either!!!!
  • this show is so cute i hate lunny toons but i love this show.........

    8.4
    "Great"
    i love watching this show when i am sick or staying home or something its really cute i hate all the other lunny toons show because there trying to kill each other in a weird dumb way but this show has a way better story line then all the other shows plus everyone get along better in this show whats really to hate about it this show about when all the lunny toons were babies and them growing up and facing some promblems baby and little kids go throw its so cute plus it teachs a lesson i think all little kids should watch it well any ways this show is cute and lol
  • Looney Tunes weren't always trying to hurt eachother. Heck before Tweety and Sylvester we're fighting. This is the show about Baby Looney Tunes.

    10
    "Perfect"
    They we're all so cute. Bugs is always the top main one. He was probably in every episode. This show also showed Lola Bunny a lot too. The show made me happy when I stayed home from school sick. I love the show, and how cute it was. So These is one of those shows we're you can learn stuff. The show was funny too. I loved the show. I think it's still on Cartoon Network too! So I recommend you watch the show because it's great. Especially for kids. I give it 4 and a half stars. Looney Tunes are the best!
  • One of WB's insults to classic cartoon buffs like me

    1.9
    "Abysmal"
    I grew up watching classic cartoons especially Looney Tunes

    but, When i heard of this show -- at first i was thrilled seeing that how muppet babies were successful and of course I do (vaguely) remember there was a Baby Looney Tunes toyline back in the early '90s but When i saw it f'r the 1st time, i went "WTF was i thinking?" because the stories in the show is vaguely amusing and the thing that caused the show to sink even lower is those cheesy kids tunes



    Shame on you Warner Bros. for destroyin' your Lonney Tunes fans' childhoods with this suckfest!
  • baby looney tunes

    9.9
    "Superb"
    The show made a reference to Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope in the episode Cereal Boxing, when Sylvester used the walkie-talkie to communicate with the Baby Daffy Duck (who was leading and started the whole scheme).Granny was in the kitchen, and apparently came in just as the babies were finishing the cereal. They hid in the cabinet as the empty cereal boxes, and when the coast was clear, they went away. Granny had let Baby Tweety and Baby Petunia Pig borrow the walkie-talkies to talk to each other in exchange for not using her phone anymore. So far these are the only other Looney Tunes featured in the series (excluding the songs). Baby Looney Tunes is an American animated television series that shows Looney Tunes characters as toddlers.



    The show premiered on WB stations usually before or after Kids' WB! on September 14, 2002. The show is similar to Muppet Babies, with the main characters taken care of by Granny. The series officially ended on April 20, 2005, but a made-for-TV movie called Oh, Max is planned for release in summer 2007 and will serve as the series finale.



    baby looney tunes is the best of all of the baby cartoon show...
  • It's about the Loony Toons as babies!

    8.0
    "Great"
    I watched this show when I was 3 and I thought it was great that time. I've grown up now and the show isn't really that interesting anymore. I found it amazing when I was 3. I loved to see them all as babies and I could really relate to them as I was just 3 myself in the start. It's a good show and every kid loves it. I used to love Minnie Mouse as a baby and Mickey and Minnie are still my favorite cartoons as of now. It's slightly odd now though and that's just because I'm too old for that stuff.
  • Cancell it Now

    1.1
    "Abysmal"
    WOW! WOW! That has my "Worst Show Ever" award. CN must be out of their minds (if they have any). They are Ugly Babys!! Only a Idiot would actually watch this crap. They would have better luck getting people to watch it on that BabyFirst TV thing. The fact that they are Creepy are only part of it. They are complete monsters that just Yell and Cry all day. If I offend anyone, I am sorry, but come on. All right, I will start thinking of the positives:

    (Thinks)

    (Still Thinking)

    (want cute watch Happy Tree friends)

    (Goes home and thinks more)

    (Dies)(;
< 1 2 3