It didn't do much with the potential it had.
5.0
"Mediocre"
"Band of Brothers" is one of those shows I've always thought would be a good watch, but I've never actually gotten around to seeing it. Mainly because of the unfortunate airing schedules it's had in my home country. Like "let's air one episode each day, and let's air it at 23:00 at night". Doesn't exactly fit in well when you have to get up at six in the morning to go to work. Or they've aired all episodes during summer, when you're off on vacation.
But, now I've gotten my hands on the DVD box so now I can decide for myself when and where to watch it. I wasn't quite sure what my expectations where when I sat down to watch the first episode. Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks are names which pretty much guarantees it will be high quality stuff, and Spielberg definitely proved with "Saving Private Ryan" that he knew how to make a war movie. HBO used to mean "Sex and the City" to me, but being a big "Rome" fan I now know that they can make some pretty good shows. Also I like the fact that it's only ten episodes, which points to going for quality above quantity and knowing when to stop. I hate the fact that most shows these days drag on for umpteen seasons which get worse and worse, instead of having the guts to quit while they're on top (just compare the number of episodes made for Brittish "the Office" and the number made for the American version). On the other hand, I couldn't help but wonder if this series wasn't just a "sequel" of sorts to "Saving Private Ryan", a kind of "well that worked well, let's do something else in that setting". So I had some high expectations and some doubts, which is an odd starting point.
Now having seen the first episode, I'd say it's about a 5 out of 10. There is some quality stuff in there, and it's usually hard to tell by the first episode if a show is going to be great or only medium. It has potential, that's for sure, but there were a few too many things I didn't like.
First of all, it's awfully cliché isn't it? Haven't we seen most of this before? I couldn't help but wonder why they decided to make this, which might be harsh since it's the first episode, but I just didn't get the feeling that they were trying to tell us something new. "These men were heroes" - yes, but who ever said they weren't? "The commanding officers were jerks, but some were nice" - yes, as seen in every other war film, basically. "They had to train really hard" - yes, that kind of goes without saying. "Some of them had brothers who were killed" - that also kind of goes without saying. "They didn't always get along, but they liked each other anyway" - yeah, that's how it mostly goes with any group of people. These elements can of course be included in movies (or in this case, shows) which take place during war, after all a lot of it is part of the reality of war. But they should be elements rather than what the whole thing is built of. In far too many war movies they are so busy painting these portraits of heroes who had to go through so much that they forget to make the characters human. They're all kind of a bunch of army Mary Sues. One of the things I liked the best about "Saving Private Ryan" was that they spent very little time painting the hero pictures and instead painted the characters as humans who weren't always heroic, nice or brave. That in the end made them seem much more real and heroic than basically any character in movies like "We Were Soldiers" or "Black Hawk Down". It's too early to tell yet whether or not the characters in this series will be real people or superheroes, but so far they're definitely going in the superhero direction.
Which brings me to another thing I wasn't very impressed by. They introduce about a dozen characters who get various amount of screen time and very little character introduction. I haven't got a clue what character has what name, who is friends with who, who thinks or feels this or that. They're all just a bunch of nameless faces at this point, which makes it really hard to follow or even care about them. There are a few scenes with characters talking amonst themselves, but I haven't got a clue which of the bunch they are or what their relationship is to one another which makes their conversations kind of pointless to me as a viewer. The commanding officers bark orders at different people but you don't know which soldier was named Guarnere and which was named Perconte. This is a problem most war depictions have, and that's why most war movies don't really move me the way that they perhaps should. When I don't know which character I'm watching I find it hard to care. This is another thing that "Saving Private Ryan" excelled in. During the opening D Day sequence you really only had to focus on Tom Hanks and Tom Sizemore (sp?), who you recognised since you know the actor. Then the rest of the company got enough screen-time and character exposition that you could tell them apart, knew their names and got their characters. During the later battle scenes you knew all the characters and what each character was doing, and you cared a whole lot more than you would have otherwise. At this point, "Band of Brothers" is just Band of Nameless People. I was really disappointed by this, since they handled the character bit so well in "Ryan" I would have expected them to do the same here. Above all I don't understand why they spent the first episode focusing almost entirely on David Schwimmer's character, when from what I've heard this is the only episode he features in for more than five minutes. That's just plain annoying, that nearly all focus is on the guy who won't be around later, while those we're supposed to follow aren't given much attention as individuals.
All in all... it was an okay watch. I'm definitely going to continue watching. But it was a big disappointment in many ways and it fell into a lot of the pits war stories usually do. I can't help but wonder if people have praised this show because it's about soldiers during the invasion of Normandy, rather than because it's a good show. I truly admire the men who went through that in real life, but a show about it can still be so-so at best.