Charlie's Angels

Follow
ABC (ended 2011)

USER EDITOR

neomichel

User Score: 137

Charlie's Angels
5.4
out of 10
User Rating
249 votes
14

SHOW REVIEWS
By TV.com Users

Show Summary

ABC is set to resurrect this 1970s classic series with Miami as the backdrop. Smallville writer-producers Miles Millar and Al Gough are joining forces with Sony Pictures TV and Drew Barrymore's Flower Films.
Minka Kelly

Minka Kelly

Eve French

Victor Garber

Victor Garber

Voice of Charles "Charlie" Townsend

Rachael Taylor

Rachael Taylor

Abigail "Abby" Simpson

Annie Ilonzeh

Annie Ilonzeh

Kate Prince

Ramon Rodriguez

Ramon Rodriguez

John Bosley

Friday
No results found.
Saturday
No results found.
Sunday
No results found.
SUBMIT REVIEW
  • 2.0
    This show makes me think of two things, after watching the entire thing. First, it seems the "casting couch" is alive and well in Hollywood, and second, I bet Drew Barrymore regrets her name ever being in the credits, and wishes she had remained a silent producer......
  • Bad acting, bad writing leads to bad show.

    4.0
    I was really looking forward to this show and thought it was going to be good but man was I disappointed. With Minka Kelly back on TV I thought she would be the glue to the show but I was not even impressed with here role or acting in this. The writers did a poor job as thing show was very hard to follow and some of the lines where terrible. When they were supposed to be heartfelt or emotional they were just flat out so bad they were funny.



    I was really wanting this show to do well but I don't think it is going to be around long. I am not even sure I will donate an hour to watch the next episode.moreless
  • Oh Dear

    2.5
    Well I will be surprised if this show lasts one season. V bad acting. Continuity shocking. Girls pretty. Thats about it. 2nd episode, noticed the dummy falling into the water, climbing outside the house in trainers to walk into the window in heels. For god sake, have someone proof the episodes before airing.
  • Really like this show

    7.5
    I really hope this update of Charlie's Angels lasts more than one season. The show is actually not trying to do anything more than give us a remake of the original...BUT using updated technology and storylines. They are even using the same show titles as the original (ex: Angels in Chains) The three leads are definitely reminders of the original Angels

    EVE: The orphan who was in trouble/Kelly Garrett

    ABBY: The fun athletic one that cracks jokes/Jill Munroe

    KATE: The more intellectual one/Sabrina Duncan

    I don't see why people are hating this show, it keeps getting better and better every week.moreless
  • LOL! I have never seen a show this bad. Or a set of "ladies" this ghetto! This is really a turn away from the glamor of the originals to a more rap video version of the three. Serious lack of class.moreless

    1.0
    The whole point of Charlies Angels is glamor. To show that makes people want to watch because the ladies are fascinating. So what did they do? they cast the most boring actresses imaginable, and gave them the most boring backgrounds imaginable. Sure I expect cliche, but not 100 percent. The first show deals with child trafficking. Which is sort of like alligators in the suers. Until I actually see someone go to jail for the crime of child trafficking, I am not going to believe it too much. Why would anyone want a 16 year old American brat? For sex? Given the economy of South America it will take a long time to get your money back trying to sell that kid. Maybe she can sew sweatshirts between clients. Ok...Thats not so important. The fight scenes are no exaggeration the very worst I have ever seen. Abby, the "catburglar" is so clumsy looking its hard to believe she can stand up unaided. I cringe when they show her climbing over a railing as if it were a grand feat. I could do it better!

    Then we have the corrupt cop. She is some sort of Foxy Brown knock off. She is actually not bad looking. But really doesn't look right dressed up. In jeans an a leather jacket, she looks fine, in a dress she looks like a truck driver. And no one wants to see Charlies Angels in jeans unless they are amazing jeans. Here we have a rather typical crop of low rise skinnies. She may be the least terrible one of the bunch, but thats not saying much.

    Then we have Minka Kelly. UGH! She is so useless I don't know where to start. She can't act. She is not beautiful other then a sort of porno pretty girl sort of way. No one would remember her face a minute after you saw it.

    So we have no charm. No plot, and weirder yet; The message is seriously messed up. These women did some awful things. They killed innocent people, and they are genuinely OK with it. In Minka Kelly's characters words they just had to deal with what cards they were dealt. Since when is it OK to steal other peoples property and then kill whoever gets in your way no matter WHAT cards you were dealt???? Disgusting. The original Angels were women who were trained and not given the chance to utilize their skills. They wanted to help people. These girls had the opportunity to help, but instead helped themselves, and now are getting a second chance for no good reason. Its certainly not because they learned their lesson, or because they want justice. They want some PC BS most of the time, but they are really too immature and spoiled to even know where people might be coming from. The only people they seem to be able to relate to are little girls. No surprise there.



    moreless
  • NO, WE DON'T MEAN FRIDAYS

    TV's Most Dangerous Timeslots

    In recent history in particular, it feels like more and more timeslots have grown increasingly dangerous.

  • THE STATE OF THE NETWORKS

    Up Front About the Upfronts, Part 3: ABC Is Headed in the Right Direction

    ABC is looking at a fourth-place finish, but believe it or not it's headed in the right direction.

  • More
    Less

    More Info About This Show

    Categories

    Drama

    Themes

    Thrillers