Many of you may say Daisy had no right to kill the pedophile. I say she had no right to allow him to continue molesting. How could anyone possibly think it moral that children should suffer so their abuser can have all the legal niceties?We talk so much about the rights of criminals these days we never bother to think about the price victims, both past and future, pay for those rights, or whether we have the right to ask it of them.
Personally, I like seeing a hero get her hands bloody. That's so rare. We want our villains to die in "tragic" accidents (like plummeting to their deaths after the hero makes a valiant rescue attempt) so we can satisfy our need for vengeance without anyone being responsible for it.