Chopped

Follow
Tuesday 10:00 PM on Food Network Premiered Jan 13, 2009 In Season

USER EDITOR

AngieJane

User Score: 7627

Chopped
6.3
out of 10
User Rating
216 votes
121

SHOW REVIEWS
By TV.com Users

Previously Aired Episode

AIRED ON 4/21/2015

Season 22 : Episode 10

Next Episode

TONIGHT AT 10PM

Season 22 : Episode 11

S 24 :  Ep 5 Aired 5/26/15
S 24 :  Ep 4 Aired 5/19/15
S 24 :  Ep 3 Aired 5/12/15
S 24 :  Ep 2 Aired 5/5/15
S 24 :  Ep 1 Aired 4/28/15
S 23 :  Ep 12 Airs 6/9/15
S 23 :  Ep 11 Aired 4/14/15
S 23 :  Ep 10 Aired 3/31/15
S 23 :  Ep 9 Aired 3/24/15
S 23 :  Ep 8 Aired 3/17/15
S 23 :  Ep 7 Aired 3/10/15
S 23 :  Ep 6 Aired 3/3/15
S 23 :  Ep 5 Aired 2/10/15
S 23 :  Ep 4 Aired 2/3/15
S 23 :  Ep 3 Aired 1/27/15
S 23 :  Ep 2 Aired 1/6/15
S 23 :  Ep 1 Aired 12/16/14
S 22 :  Ep 11 NEXT EPISODE Airs 6/2/15
S 22 :  Ep 10 Aired 4/21/15
S 22 :  Ep 9 Aired 4/7/15
S 22 :  Ep 8 Aired 2/24/15
S 22 :  Ep 7 Aired 2/17/15

Show Summary

Hosted by Ted Allen, Chopped challenges four promising chefs to turn a selection of everyday ingredients into an extraordinary three-course meal. In each episode, four chefs compete. The show is divided into three rounds; in each round, the chefs are given a basket containing between three and five unrelated ingredients, and the dish each competitor prepares must contain all of these ingredients. The competitors are also given access to a pantry and refrigerator, which is stocked with a wide variety of other ingredients. Each round is times, and the chefs must cook their dishes and plate them before the time elapses.
After each round, a rotating round of culinary judges critique the dishes based on presentation, taste and creativity. The judges then decide which chef is "chopped," and that chef is eliminated from the competition. By the Dessert round, only two chefs remain. When deciding the winner, the judges consider not only the dessert course, but the entire meal presented by each chef as a whole. The winner of the competition receives prize money, usually in the amount of $10,000.

moreless
6:00pm
FOOD
7:00pm
FOOD
8:00pm
FOOD
9:00pm
FOOD
10:00pm
Hot Stuff
NEW
FOOD
11:00pm
FOOD
12:00am
FOOD
Wednesday
1:00am
FOOD
3:00am
FOOD
12:00pm
FOOD
Thursday
12:00pm
FOOD
6:00pm
FOOD
7:00pm
FOOD
8:00pm
FOOD
9:00pm
FOOD

Fan Reviews (121)

SUBMIT REVIEW
  • all star bad behavior!!

    4.0
    On all star show for charity, my husband and I were disappointed in Chef Penny's behavior towards the other contestants, at that level there was certainly no need to gloat, and that it was shown on the show all disappointing. Normally we love the whole show and have watched almost every show.
  • "An Egg Up"

    2.0
    I'm probably never watching this show again. It was easy to determine from the comments of the judges who should be cut in the first two rounds. In the finale the basically said this George guy did not perform at 100 percent but it was good . The other guy, Jeremy was tasteless. Someone needs to review the final comments and see how Jeremy won. I don't know any of the contestants, but if you see this episode you would think that the Green Police stepped in and forced the judges to pick a healthy chef. This show sucked... If Guy Fieri had been on this show as a contestant he would have lost for not being healthy enough with Mitch too Mitch flavor. I believe the only way this show can ever be fair is for a blind fast test and a number rating before the judges can critique the dish. If I tell the judges I'm going to use the prize money to put my blind daughter in a special school to win. Other is only one way my opinion can count, and that'that's to never watch again.

    moreless
  • The Unused Ingredient

    9.0
    One of my greatest pet peeves for this show is when a contestant doesn't use all the mystery ingredients and still wins the round. The justification is that their dish was so much better than their opponent's that it overcame this misstep, but we don't know what would have happened in the counterfactual universe where the opponent also only had to use 3 or less ingredients. It might have been even more amazing. I would like to propose a solution to this problem. Whenever a contestant doesn't use an ingredient, it should be placed right on top of their dish as an untransformed ingredient. That way the judges could still get a sense of whether or not the ingredient might have worked in the dish, and it would also affect the plating, which I think is completely ignored when an ingredient is left out. I have a couple more minor comments as well. I really wish the show used a blind taste-test as they do on Beat Bobby Flay. I often feel as though judgments are made about the character of the chefs rather than their culinary abilities. Even if that's not true, as an audience member I would still find it more satisfying. Finally, I feel like the show tries too hard to create suspense when someone is about to get chopped with the side effect that some dishes are probably presented as more worthwhile than they really are . they are falsely shown to be as good as their competitor's). What this does is lead to a sense of injustice on the part of the audience member, because when the judges act like the dishes are really close in quality, the audience gets a sense that they can tell which is better, and then is disappointed with the judgments. If a dish sucks, don't pretend like it's got a lot of merit, it just makes the audience mistrust the judges.moreless
  • Racism--unfair--really?

    10
    Are you REALLY watching the show? In reading just a handful of reviews about this show, I have to ask--are you "reviewers" really watching the show? Or are you just looking for ways to incorporate racism here as well as in every other venue known to man? Incredible. I want my raw meat cooked and I don't want hair in my food--guess that makes me a racist too. Come to my kitchen and watch me cook and I'm sure you'll find something I'm doing that's racist with that too. I'm sure I mow my lawn in a racist manner also. Jeez. Not fair? Oh poor people, fair only counts in baseball. Feeling sorry for someone does not a good chef make. Chopped judges are great--and FAIR. Yes I said it! They're true professionals--just take the time to look at their considerable and impressive credentials. Alex G. is a super individual who is passionate about her field and is looking to help these chefs get to where they want to be (and I say the same of Jeffrey, Scott, Aaron and everyone else up there), but guess what--they chefs can't get to where they "think" they want to go if they don't know what they're doing wrong. And if they can't take the heat--well, you know, I won't say it. Anybody who takes offense (that's the correct spelling people) at the critiques should not be putting themselves in that position. Why do adults get so worked up when they're told they are anything less than perfect?!? Where did this entitlement come from? Do you still cry when you're told not to color outside the lines? True adults realize that a good mentor is how you grow and constructive criticism is vital for success. This is an overall fun show, well put together, and the judges are extremely fair. Most of the contestants seem to be very serious in their endeavors and MOST of them graciously accept the feedback. Now, you whiners--go pacify yourselves with a balloon and grow up someday.moreless
  • Yes it is about race.

    5.5
    Scott Conant is easily racist and misogynistic, he's harsher towards contestants who are PoC and when he's judging I've never seen a colored chef win. He out-talks the female judges and completely disregards them most likely to try to make them look stupid or something and hes rude to the female contestants as well.

  • AND THE WINNER COULD BE...

    The Critics' Choice Awards Nominations Choose Game of Thrones, Breaking Bad

    The anti-Emmys have rolled out their ballot and there are plenty of dark horses but also some expected snubs.

  • More
    Less

    More Info About This Show

    Themes

    Profile, Cooking