This was a nice episode, they tried something new as CSI producers are fond of doing on a fairly regular basis. And while I'm usually a huge fan of those new ways of showing the scenes and exploring the "who done its" of the cases. Cases of the nature explored were better served under a "normal" episode format. They tried to show that any case can have two sides to it. But they ended up revealing that they screwed up by looking at the most easily found evidence instead of exploring all options before collectively comparing all the evidence as they normally do.
It was a nice episode, just felt weird that in this episode they took what they were doing so lightly.





