In a showcase for Emily Procter, Jonathan Togo, and Adam Rodriguez, the team of Duquesne, Delko, and Wolfe are left to run a case themselves in a mostly Horatio-free episode. A death of a hotel employee leads each CSI to a different conclusion.
Borrowing from the Japanese classic Rashomon, where 4 defendants each have their own version of what happened, 3 hotel guests each have their own story to tell regarding the death of a hotel employee. Departing from the formula, each guest is actually telling the truth, believes themselves to be at least partly responsible, and is supported by evidence. Knowing all three stories can't be true, the CSI team has to let the evidence lead them to the killer.
While both the various interpretations by the guests/suspects and some misinterpretations by the CSIs regarding their co-workers provide the twist, it also serves to reveal some communication problems between the co-workers, something that Horatio's few scenes indicate will likely be addressed in coming episodes. It's also the episode's one flaw, as there being such poor communication at a major metropolitan crime lab is a bit tough to believe, so it being the driver of a storyline feels a bit like cheating.
Still, the CSI franchise tried something a bit new and came away with another interesting hour.





