Couplet
Written by Jenna Bans And Kevin Murphy
Directed by David Grossman
7.0
"Good"
Man is this episode given the most cliché of titles or what? Yes everything this week is about the power of partnerships, whether it’s them being dissolved, becoming stronger or showing hints of formation. In other words, it’s enough to make you a bit depressed about being a singleton but nowhere near as depressing if you had to deal with Nora on a day to day basis and that would be beyond depressing.
Bree and Orson took centre stage in the season premiere due to the fact that the former is more or less the season’s big mystery and suffice to say, it’s really not much of a stretch that they are the big feature yet again.
I’m not complaining because this week we get their wedding as instead of the writers leaving the event for the US sweeps period, it comes now and because all the other housewives have their own storyline, it’s really not that hard to be intrigued. Plus I love the fact that this is feeling more like an ensemble series once again.
When being accused by your former neighbour and general nuisance Carolyn that you’re responsible for killing your former spouse during your own engagement party, Orson should expect to be under the scrutiny of his new neighbours as well as his fiancée’s best friends and the fact that Susan and company are vocal about their concerns is more of a relief than a worry in my opinion.
If Orson really didn’t kill his wife and the chances of him actually being innocent are pretty good, then in due course he’ll be proved right and we’ll find out who really did, although Carolyn certainly looks psychotic enough to do someone in. For the time if I were Orson, I wouldn’t make the mistake of underestimating my neighbours.
That being said when Bree isn’t raising psychos like the rather demonic Andrew, then she does have a tendency to sleep with them as much as I want to completely ship her and Orson (great chemistry, interesting dynamics – usual reasons to ship a good TV couple, etc), there is still the fact that Orson ran over Mike for no reason. Why haven’t we gotten a little more insight into that and more importantly what has Mike done that Orson would leave him for dead?
That’s also coupled with the fact that while Carolyn does strike me as a pain in the hole, there still may be an element of truth in what she’s saying because some of her rant did seem a little revealing and hey, the whole Mike incident itself.
Even on Bree’s big wedding itself, Susan and the rest of the girls aren’t totally convinced of Orson’s innocence and use this day of all to get the deliriously happy bride to least ask Orson that vital question – did he kill Alma? As Lynette points out, it’s bad luck to marry a murderous lover, just look at Tracy and Charlie in Coronation Street as a pretty good case in point.
Of course it did take Bree quite amount of persuading to actually ask Orson that thorny question and when she finally did and momentarily halted her wedding to get an answer, it proves that Bree has developed a little bit of growth in the last year or so and in fairness, Orson could tell that Bree had the slightest doubt about him, so he should’ve seen that question coming a mile off.
Also if Orson is a killer, he better watch his step in a big way because although Bree has a tendency to repress things and her OCD like way of living, she is far from the subservient type that former wife Alma seemed to be, so Orson better not expect her to cower in fear if he raises his voice.
The wedding itself is fairly rushed and still manages to get spoiled when Orson and Bree are told by the cops to go to the morgue and identify a woman matching Alma’s description, alongside a rather venomous Carolyn and it turns out that neither Orson or Carolyn can identify the woman, well at least they claim not to.
Which is strange because these two are on opposing sides and when Orson does reference the cadaver as Monique, more questions get raised as they have a tendency to happen on Wisteria Lane. Who exactly is Monique and why didn’t Orson identify? Does Carolyn know her and if so why didn’t she identify her? Also is there a chance that Monique may be related to Alma?
Meanwhile when she’s not snooping around the ever recurring theme that is Susan Mayer’s love life continues to be the focal point of her storylines on the series and why it’s not exactly intense, captivating material, her increasing interactions with the doltish Ian warrants some kind of a debate.
After the two of them go on a first date, in which they’re interrupted by Jane’s parents and Susan is told to play doctor, the rather guilty housewife comes to the conclusion that maybe disengaging from Ian would be a smart idea and given how rare Susan gets a smart idea, she has my support on this one.
I don’t particularly hate Ian as such and while he may have resigned himself to the fact that Jane isn’t ever going to wake up and feels the need to move on with his life, it’s a little stupid to automatically try and force another person into doing the same thing and Susan’s conflict over Mike, while not interesting comes across as genuine enough that even Ian should back off.
Which the silly dolt doesn’t and decides to proclaim his love for a woman he hardly knows during a lame assed speech during Bree and Orson’s reception, to which Susan makes worse by indulging and making a pathetic attempt of fighting him off, which doesn’t last long enough to actually count now. Given the huge napkins on his table, if I had been sitting Mr Englishman and had to listen to that boring rant, I would’ve had Ian bound and gagged within seconds and sent back to the mother country. What maybe the writers were hoping would come across as sweet and endearing comes across as needy and possessive. Run, Mayer, run!
Pushy is also something that Gabby and Carlos are experts on as the bickering duo are still incessantly tearing strips of one another over who gets exactly what in their divorce settlement and a brief truce between over one of Mama Solis’ necklace and an invite to Bree and Orson’s wedding is only temporary.
When Gabby discovers that Carlos has mistaken her little acts of kindness as a come on, she throws herself at a gay waiter while Carlos gets more than a bit touchy feely with Nora. Still though, their War Of The Roses style of dealing with each other is cut short when Xiao-Mei’s waters break and the parent bug hits both of them like wildfire.
It turns out that when they’re trying to become parents something also goes wrong for them and whether it’s Gabrielle miscarrying, getting blacklisted or having their adopted child snatched from them, you do wonder when Marc and company are going to let Carlos and Gabrielle become parents.
This time the setback turns out to be Xiao-Mei giving birth to a black baby and the Solis’s learning that their embryos are more or less a dud. Gabrielle reacts in her usual manner when things don’t go her way but once again, I feel bad for these two and it’s strange because of the time, both Gabby and Carlos are irritating. Here’s hoping the next time they try for a kid, they actually get it this time because this is one joke that is beginning to wear a bit thin.
Elsewhere the bane of Lynette’s own existence Nora is still managing to make the Scavo woman a bit crazier than usual and while Nora isn’t half as vapid or annoying as the previous episode, you still find yourself siding with Lynette.
This explains Lynette’s rather pathetic attempt of setting Nora and Carlos up much to Tom’s concern and Gabby’s sheer annoyance because it seems that Nora can’t even hold onto a thug named Turk while kills Lynette’s non-Nora buzz as the vapid woman ditches her convict boyfriend. There’s also a wonderfully telling scene between Lynette and Gabrielle at the hospital which makes you wonder how much damage the revelation of Kayla’s existence has really affected the Scavo marriage. It’s also great to see Gabby also dish out some compassionate advice to Lynette as well.
Finally the unfairly underused Edie is also given a storyline when she is put in the role of guardian. I was hoping that the producers were going to live up their promise and actually introduce to that son Edie has had and has only been mentioned once, but it turns out that the person she’s looking after is her nephew Austin.
The new hunk on Wisteria Lane and more or less there to fill the void left by John Rowland and Matthew Applewhite, Josh Henderson is as wooden as one of the actors who played his predecessors but the fact that Austin’s presence means that Edie is given a storyline beyond making Susan’ life a misery (and vice versa) makes me one happy viewer.
Austin is pretty much a stereotype and slightly less engaging than Ian. He’s more or less a bit of bad boy with a questionable taste in music and there’s an instant if obvious attraction between him and Julie, which no amount of snark from the latter can actually mask. I bet by the next five episodes, these two will be groin buddies of some kind.
Also in “It Takes Two”
Housewife of the week: This time it’s Bree as she gives each of the ladies a responsibility for her rather speedy wedding. The girls cringing at their original green dresses reminded me of the Buffy episode “Hell’s Bells”.
Gabrielle (re dress): “They’re perfect”
Lynette: “With your colouring”.
Bree: “Men have lied to me before; believe me that won’t happen again”
Orson: “So you trust me completely?”
The Opening Credits are back for this episode. Please ABC keep them!
Nora (re Turk): “And then he threatened to hit me” Lynette: “But he didn’t”.
Nora’s guy was arrested after their little argument and according to Tom he had skulls on his truck.
Edie: “You’re eighteen right?”
Austin: “That’s what my ID says”
Edie: “Yeah mine too”.
Austin: “How do you like it?”
Julie: “You know what, you’re not that hot”.
Austin doesn’t seem to have a father figure in his life and assaulted his mum’s latest boyfriend. Will we actually meet Edie’s sister this series?
Susan (re Orson): “I was wondering if you could elaborate”
Carolyn: “He killed her, what else do you need to know?”
Bree: “I can’t talk to Orson. It’s bad luck for the groom to see the bride before the wedding”
Lynette: “You know what’s really bad luck? Marrying a wife killer”.
Carolyn works in the bank in Wisteria Lane. Is her purpose this season just to annoy Orson?
Tad: “Should I cup your boob?”
Gabrielle: “No I’ll drive”.
Tom (re Carlos/Nora): “You are going to rot in hell for this”
Lynette: “Hey I just brought two lost souls together”.
No Andrew this week and also isn’t it a bit strange that Danielle wasn’t a bridesmaid for her own mother’s wedding?
Lynette: “How can you be so sure?”
Gabrielle: “Because some marriages are built to last, some aren’t”.
Gabrielle (to the doctor): “You screw up our lives and the best thing you can say is that how the cookie crumbles?”
Chronology: Two weeks since “Listen To The Rain On The Roof”.
Not quite as good as the premiere but “It Takes Two” makes all the right noises and is overall a fun, lively romp with plenty to recommend. All of the relationships peak the right amount of intrigue and this year’s mystery is certainly very promising as we get our first twist in the saga.