A bit of a flawed script, but otherwise it was good enough
7.5
"Good"
Before I begin my review, I would just like to say to all the David Tennant fans out there who only bought tickets to see the royal shakespeare company's production of Hamlet just to see him in it, and then were faced with someone else because David Tennant hurt his back: Ha Ha!!! Screw you!!!
Note: This is coming from somone who couldn't get tickets for it
Anyway
There have been episodes since doctor who's revival back in 2005 that have had me questioning whether or not I should still bother watching it or actually caring what happens. Maybe it depends on what mood I'm in, who knows, but stuff like love and monsters and a large portion of series 3 had me feeling this way. But then you have episodes like the stunning 65 minute finale of last series and blink and I end up loving the show more than ever. But my major problem is that I have ideas for how I would make the episode which many would probably protest as unsuitable for children. When I say that I would like to see an episode involving cybermen that has a sequence where we see what actually happens in full gory detail, people often question my sanity, I'm a horror film fanatic, its just how I feel okay? Its not screwed up, its just my imagination runs away with me sometimes. Anyway, what was I saying? Oh yeah, um, that's my problem, I often have far out expectations of what will encompass an episode of doctor who which are majorly different to how it turns out. 42 was one of these, I didn't anticipate it to be a family friendly version of the film "sunshine", it was still pretty good, but y'know, I just had my expectations. Its not good to have these, it means you get let down if its not how you pictured it, on the other hand it can sometimes be better, which happened in the cases of school reunion, blink, midnight etc.
This episode I was anticipating, not because of the whole "its Christmas, let's all be happy about that :)" thing, but more because of the whole "look its the cybermen" thing. The cybermen are a great concept, Kit Pedler's original vision however being changed in this way, it kind of lacked their original impact. If you try watching the tenth planet (well, the first three episodes at least, thank you BBC archivists of the 1650's in your infinite wisdom) its just really well done for a 60's TV show, the cybermen are just ******* ruthless machines, and admittedly that's also true of the cybermen of today, but they lack the aura of these original cybermen. They lack the mysterious past and development of the original cybermen, they didn't reboot the dalek origin, why should this be any different? Oh right, because then that would go into sincere bouts of continuity explanation hell, as proved by attack of the cybermen (****, I know too much about this show). But as good as the whole alternate universe storyline was (well, it was fairly decent), this universe's cybermen still exist. Although the cybermen were a saving quality of this episode, not so certain about the gorilla-cyber-things, they seemed a tad unneccessary. But still, cybermen are cybermen, screwed up by recent developments and lacking in that certain something the originals though they may be, they're a decent monster, and are a decent enemy, if the plot had been expanded and the episode happened to be a bit longer, then maybe it would have been a better episode.
The plot developments in this episode did make it seem rather rushed, its like they're trying to cram two hours worth of stuff into one, a more expansive and developed storyline would make it a better episode, rather like the four parters of old. I didn't like some directions this went in though, i mean child labour to pirate a massive cyberman thing? I mean come on, be logical, I mean admittedly at the end of last series we had daleks steal planets from all over the galaxy, but....okay this point is dying, I'm just gonna move off it. Onto David Morrissey, jesus, the bookies must be near to killing themselves now, the odds on him being the next doctor were huge. Surely they realised the possibility of him just being someone who's gone mental and thought he was the doctor, you can explain that away with ease, and it makes up a decent part of the plot. I respect David Morrissey as an actor, but the only thing that made me dislike his performance here was a bit of dodgy scripting. Now I know that in the past I've been known to criticise episodes set in the past for not being "old englishy" enough, but this just proves how wrong I was. I admit the plot flowed well enough, flawed though it was, he fitted in well and the script was decent enough, but some of the dialogue really did seem a bit too forced for my liking. This happened with many characters, bar the doctor of course, all however except Ms Hartigan, she gave a brilliant performance, especially so in the graveyard scene, some of the more abstract parts of the plot just made me think that she really is too good.
But about the graveyard scene: that really was one of the most cinematic sequences in doctor who, I mean really, really well filmed, you can tell the director really knows what he's doing. I dunno if anyone else felt the same way, I don't really care, but just the cybermen walking out of the mist and killing everyone, great direction there. That was this episode's main strongpoint. The plot may have been rather ridiculous at times, but the direction was still as skilled as ever before, if not more so.
My disappointment in this episode mainly fits in with my dislike of some aspects of the plot, other than that its as decent as any other, well maybe not blink or the empty child, but anyway I can't be bothered to moan about it anymore, Wallace and Gromit's on soon, hopefully I won't be as dissappointed by that.
Happy Christmas everyonemoreless