A Downton Abbey Community
PBS (ended 2015)

Downton Abbey S04E01: "Part One" (Episode 1 and Episode 2 as they aired in the U.K.)


Not gonna lie, I was more than a little worried about what Downton Abbey would look like without Matthew Crawley following his sudden and soul-crushing death in last season's finale/Christmas special. I mean, I wouldn't go as far as to say that the entire point of the show was Mary and Matthew's endless courtship, but their story was certainly a priority. I didn't even particularly care, personally, about Matthew and Mary's Epic Saga, which always seemed so stuffy and dull compared to, say, Sybil and Tom as a couple or even Edith and Strallan as a couple. Honestly, there were times when I didn't even particularly like Mary all that much and... well... it doesn't even matter anymore because this new depressed-and-totally-at-a-loss-for-what-to-do-with-the-human-she-squeezed-out-of-her-vajayjay Mary is weirdly appealing in an OMG SHE'S HUMAN kind of way. 

And for now, the late Matthew Crawley's presence is still so deeply ingrained in every aspect of the estate that at times, the Season 4 premiere didn't entirely feel as though his absence had been fully realized on the screen. From the opening shot of the Estate shrouded in bleak, colorless fog to his surviving family's obsession with "what Matthew would have wanted," the onetime heir to Downton is still a driving force behind much of the goings-on at the mansion—upstairs, at least. 


Downstairs, despite the midnight flight of Miss O'Brien for the exotic climes of India, it was very much business as usual. Ivy and Daisy bickered over boys. Mrs. Patmore was scared of the new electric mixer. Carson was a stubborn ass about being a decent human being until Mrs. Hughes invaded his privacy and made him play nice with the long-lost ex-BFF who totally stole his woman. Oh, and Edna's back because Branson's storyline isn't horribly depressing enough as it is. YOU STAY AWAY FROM HIM, YOU HUSSY. 

Yeah, nah, I don't really care if Branson moves on from Sybil—he's human and he's young and Sybil would have probably wanted it—it's just that Edna is awful and clearly just an opportunist bordering on being a con-artist. And for the record, I also don't mind if Mary eventually moves on; I'm just not ready to invest in yet another round of Lady Mary's Endless Parade of Posh Suitors. Matthew and Mary's wedding was such a culminating event on Downton Abbey, not just for providing us with a satisfying ending to a story that'd been three seasons in-the-making, but also for all the potential story possibilities it opened up as the Crawley family saw their priorities change. The Estate was saved, and Mary had avoided scandal and ruin and managed to fulfill her destiny by marrying the "right" dude, who she also had the fortune of not being repulsed by. As Downton Abbey roared into the 1920s, the undeniable newness looming on the horizon was a tantalizing promise... making our return to a decidedly regressed Downton all the more disappointing. 


In the first half of tonight's two-hour premiere, once again, Mary was technically penniless, as without a male heir for a husband, the family fortune would go immediately to the wee baby George. With the looming death duties demanding payment, Downton was once again facing financial ruin, meaning George probably won't have much of an inheritance anyway. 

And in the second half, once again, Mary's place in the hierarchy was conveniently saved by a late-arriving letter. The threat of losing everything—or at least a substantial amount of it—to taxes still stands, but with Mary resolving to take an active role in the running of the Estate and her (and Tom's) commitment to fulfilling Matthew's quest to modernize and make the lands profitable, chances are the fortune will be just fine. BUT (of course there's a but) as Mary and Branson went forward with their plans, Robert once again got a bug up his butt about TRADITION and running Downton THE RIGHT WAY and once again set to being kind of a skeevy jackass in his determination to make bad decisions on behalf of everyone because he has the penis, and therefore all the power. ("When you talk like that I'm tempted to ring for Nanny and have you put to bed with no th-supper." LOL <3 U, Granny!)


Of course, history is cyclical, and the battle between old and new, tradition and revolution, Robert and literally everyone else, has always been a part of Downton Abbey's mythos. The 1920s are remembered by history as a boisterous era full of excess, jazz, and optimism, but you'd never know it to look at Downton, which to the Estate's older residents may very well be the entire point. As an institution, Downton symbolizes a way of life that within the show's own time period was dying—quickly, unceremoniously, and for many outside the gilded walls, not nearly fast enough. The '20s as we know them are present in Lady Rose and her careless frivolity and Edith with her impossible romance, her writing career, and her gradual shrugging-off of the old rules of courtships (you know she's totally gonna spend the night at Gregson's swank bachelor pad soon). Even Mary, who despite her initial reluctance, embraced her new active role in the estate's everyday operations with a surprising amount of passion and enthusiasm. She's not just going through the motions. She's not just doing it to safeguard George's future. Lady Mary has become empowered by her ability to have a say in things, to influence change, and to become an active participant in her own life.


Okay, so we didn't get the bright new future that was promised with the wedding of Matthew and Mary and the subsequent birth of their son, or with Matthew's ambitious goal to build a strong, modern Downton that would weather the ravages of time—that's what happens when someone dies before they're supposed to. But despite the painful repetition of old points that was present in this premiere, there was an underlying strength in the Crawley family's mourning period that gave birth to a more subdued newness in the spring. Sweeping change was never really Downton's thing anyway, you know?



NOTES

– Gregson decided to become a German citizen so he could legally divorce his secret crazypants wife and make an honest woman out of Edith. Post-World War I Germany just sounds delightful, doesn't it? I'm sure this won't backfire at all. 

– Why did Rose want Edna to work at Downton so badly? 

– Does this mean Edith with Googly Eyes will update again? Miss yooou. 

– The Voice veterans The Shields Brothers recently graced us with a Downton Abbey/Beatles mash-up that you should probably have in your life because "Eleanor Rigby" is pretty much Downton Abbey in a musical nutshell. 

– How long until we end up with Mary's love life once again being the MOST IMPORTANT STORYLINE EVER?

– Why can't Edna go away?

– Do we miss O'Brien?

– Nanny West: BYE FOREVER C U NEVER.

– Thomas's protectiveness of baby Sybbie hit me right in the feels. 

– Widow Mary was pretty heartbreaking, but I just can't with Isobel. I JUST CAN'T. I need her to hook up with Clarkson and live happily ever after, okay?

– Mrs. Patmore freaking out about the devil magic of modern appliances will never stop being the best thing.

– Poor Daisy.

– Poor Moseley.

– Poor everyone. 


What did you think of Downton Abbey's Season 4 premiere? 


Previously Aired Episode

AIRED ON 12/25/2015

Season 6 : Episode 9

43 Comments
Comments (40)
Submit
Sort: Latest | Popular
I feel so bad for Mosley! Look what you did, Dan Stevens! Also, love the shout out to Gwen, the housemaid-turned-secretary (thank you, Sybil!) and her marriage!

I will say, didn't cry nearly as much as I thought I would.

I do miss O'Brien, but I have a feeling she may be back, considering she's working for Rose's mom (mum?).
1
Reply
Flag
Man. I was hoping that with the end of 2013 behind us, we could put that whole "squeezed-out-of-her-vajayjay" business behind us. Please. I'll overlook this one if we can just all work together now on moving past it. Please.
2
Reply
Flag
Staff
The quick re-emergence of the status quo and the oh-so-lucky letter were annoying, but not surprising. The show loves doling out quickie resolutions to its big narrative problems, be they bars of soap or horrible scarred soldiers disappearing into the night, so it's pretty par for the course.

Increasingly, it's a show I like for its parts but not their sums. Tom and Mary are an lovely duo, and I've come to love Edith and her gloriously modern but not showy clothes, but so much the show is just...they keep talking about change, but the characters are largely insulated from change, and the show itself it quick to avoid major changes itself. It's troublesome.
5
Reply
Flag
Dear Downton Abbey,

Things I do not care about:
1) Rose;
2) Charlie Carson's Wild Ways;
3) Thomas' scheming turning out to be for good, not evil; and
4) Letters from the dead that magically erase serious problems.

I had the opposite response to Mary's widowhood. I used to enjoy laughing at her outrageous bitchitude, but now she's all sad and pitiful. The mildest snicker at her self-pity made me feel like a terrible person. Shame on you, show; I want my Mean Girl back.

9
Reply
Flag
How many more times can the British remake Upstairs/Downstairs?
4
Reply
Flag
They can't. D/A doesn't even come close.

There will never be another Mrs. Bridges and Mr. Hudson.
3
Reply
Flag
Off the track but doesn't Laura Carmichael look like Barbara Stanwyck? Anyway, I loved the first episode, I know the critics in UK and here rip this show apart ... but I love Downton Abbey. It is so nice - no Hooter's waitresses cast as Supreme Court Justices, no Chippendale dances cast as Fire Chiefs in Chicago/New York/Jersey, no scripted reality show backwoods idiots who were wearing cargo pants five years ago. Just a pleasantly wealthy family falling apart. Lovely.
9
Reply
Flag
Edith with Googly Eyes is the best thing I've seen in a long time. I was dying at my desk.
2
Reply
Flag
I was underwhelmed but maybe a rewatch will revive my interest.
8
Reply
Flag
Or a large Scotch.
Reply
Flag
The old guy Carson saw off at the train - that wasn't my beloved Fat Andy aka Warren Clarke, was it? He had hints of Dalziel around the mouth.

Sorry, D/A, I tried. You're still a soap opera to me with no characters that I am so very invested in that I just HAVE to follow the show each week.

Meanwhile, I just saw Seven Psychopaths, holy crap on a cracker was THAT good. No room in Hollywood for old broads, though, that's the truth. Meanwhile, Walken goes on and on and on and on and on and on.............
Reply
Flag
The old guy Carson saw off at the train - that wasn't my beloved Fat Andy aka Warren Clarke, was it?

No, it was Nicky Henson as Griggs, who has survived three bouts with cancer and is still acting at age 68, good on him. He was, if you are old as dirt and recall Fawlty Towers, the smarmy guy with the shirt open down to there and the chain necklaces, to whom Sybil took a fancy. Yes, that guy!
Reply
Flag
Seven Psychopaths was a really interesting movie.
2
Reply
Flag
Killers who love dogs - can they really be all bad?

Interestingly, the movie was all about love. And done so much more convincingly than 99-44/100% of the schmaltz being produced today.

Now if only Harrelson wouldn't wear that rug in True Detective.
Reply
Flag
the pilot is so much better than the review makes it out to be - michelle dockery was amazing and heartbreaking
5
Reply
Flag
Silly me, I thought this might possibly be one show which would be exempt from getting the usual MaryAnn Treatment, which is to frequently have genuinely good observations and insights annoyingly couched in the linguistic style of a 13-year-old girl with a terribly bad Internet addiction. That style is fine for a personal blog or Facebook page but it's far too childish for a show (and/or an entire site) such as this one. Even Tim knows when it's time to write like an adult should. If someone told you that working copious amounts of Netspeak into every single review was a good idea, that person is not your friend. A very little of that goes an awfully long way. It's nowhere near as cute as you seem to think it is and very greatly detracts from what is otherwise decent commentary. Put another way, and with apologies to Sprint, it's totes mcgotes not cray-cray adorbs.

I quit reading this seriously as soon as I saw "vajayjay," knowing that the whole rest of the review would be predictably -- and lamentably -- MaryAnn-ish.
29
Reply
Flag
Why should this be "the one show"? Because the people have English accents and period dress? Downton is just a nighttime soap dressed up in fancier clothes. There's nothing intellectually challenging about any of it. The miraculous (and ridiculous) salvation of Thomas last season, and the miraculous (and ridiculous) letter from Matthew demonstrated that the writers have no interest in actually exploring the punishing realities of the time period, opting instead for the typical Hollywood gloss on the rights of women and gays.

When D/A decides to stop acting like a 13 year old playing dress up, then and only then will a review like this be inappropriate. Otherwise, I liked Mary Ann's tone just fine.
4
Reply
Flag
What TQB said.
Reply
Flag
Not only is your comment inaccurate, it's also rude and the fact that you quit reading in the first paragraph shows that you're not sufficiently informed to sling mud. If you reread the review you'd see that on the whole it is literate and intelligent. Yes there is the occasional use of Netspeak but guess what, you'd be hard pressed to find a writer on this site that doesn't do exactly the same thing, including Tim and have you read a Price photo recap lately? Rather than detracting from the review this style adds an informal comedic irony that makes the review more entertaining while also making it clear that the show shouldn't be taken too seriously. This show is ideal for such treatment as it tends towards melodrama. Maybe these attributes in a review don't appeal to you - fair enough, you can stop reading, it is however no justification to be rude.
4
Reply
Flag
Harsh, but true...
6
Reply
Flag
Ouch. Cruel. If that's your resume, I think TV.com is going to tell you to fuck off.
Reply
Flag
Why couldn't Miss O'Brien take Thomas with her? That's all I really want to know. Seriously, that character has no redeeming qualities about him whatsoever. He has showed humanity briefly but really he's just ugly.

Other than that, I thought this was a strong premiere and everything that I've come to expect of the show.

And lastly, Mr. Bates & Anna...I mean ADORABLE is the only word I can think of.
5
Reply
Flag
Also, O'Brien and Thomas were at odds with one another through all of the last season. Plus, his porcelain skin is far too fair for India.
1
Reply
Flag
I had forgotten about that til just now (O'Brien and Thomas, that is).
Reply
Flag
Hey, what is wrong with soulless human beings? I am soulless and relate to Thomas's character mrore than the gag-inducing Mr. Beeeiiites and that blonde girl he is with that looks like a sheep in human form. I try to fast forward whenever they come on my screen. I watch the show on iTunes, I buy the show on iTunes so that I can fast forward through watching those two. I spend money to keep them away from my eyes. Thomas is beautiful too. And smart. You know what. I think he just might be exactly like me too, and I also kind of look like him too, actually. I am tall, thin, pale with black hair and light eyes, uhm, so cut it out with the whole soulless thing, we have souls, we are just darker of personas than the whole Muppet cast and Disney Princess People. Good God. A lot of characters with high value contrasts (platinum hair, porcelain skin, black hair) are casted as 'villains'. Why dont you try appreciating the contrast their characters play instead of making me want to throw up on my iPad keyboard.
3
Reply
Flag
I am soulless

Good for you! Souls are overrated.
Reply
Flag
Oh man, I agree with both of you. I want Thomas to go away because he's just so good at being bad. But if not for Thomas (and without O'Brien) what would care about? Bates and Anna are adorable, but, come on, they can't just sit around and be adorable all the time. Why would we watch them? Also, am I the only one who doesn't want to hear anymore about what "Bates learned in prison"? Creepy.
2
Reply
Flag
Sheep in human form - so harsh yet too true to be dismissed - well played.
4
Reply
Flag
Are you stating that you are a sociopath too?
5
Reply
Flag
Replying to ask myself this in front of you: Can somebody kill off Mr. Bates please. Include: Primary Patriarch-Sour-Faced Wimp Man, uhm, the insectual cook girl, the somehow-suppose-to-be-pretty new cook-girl that works alongside the Insect girl that the two sappy-syrupy guys fight over, uhm, give the Scottish ruddy older cook a love interest because she is a bad-a**, replace the butler with the crazy-eyebrows with.....I dont know I am just tired of looking at him. When was the concept of make-up introduced to these English people anyhow. Make Mary have more sarcastic comments about Edith, she does it so well. Make Mary a bada**. Make Edith relevant, she is awesome in her own way. Uhm, yep, thats all the complaints I can think of as of now to myself.
3
Reply
Flag
Thomas is interesting. His flashes of humanity let us know that he's not completely soulless. I thought, surely, the war would change him. But they've actually written a pretty deep character who doesn't change (because people don't) because of things that happen around him and the fact he knows he's hated. He's lonely and likes to brood in his loneliness. His reaction to Sibyl's death was one of the finest moments of the show.

If only they could get away from his gossipy schemes and come up with a real storyline for him again. I did enjoy the clever twist they played with his manufactured story about the nanny being true; but pinning the ruined linen on Anna served no purpose.
10
Reply
Flag
Its the gossipy schemes that bother me most. I mean if he still has to be a manipulator, at least, his manipulations should mature.
1
Reply
Flag
I guess sombre is what we should've expected - there weren't even any opening credits! It is interesting that Mary has become a lot more watchable since Matthew's death. I wonder what she'd have been up to if he hadn't left the show - not much I'd expect other than mourning Sybil. It's unusual to have a forced change actually improve a show.
Reply
Flag
Amazing show with fantastic actors
11
Reply
Flag
Follow this Show
Members
4,737