Just finished watching this yesterday and frankly I'm disappointed. The story concerns the rape and murder of a 19-year old female student in Copenhagen. We follow the investigation, led by resolutely unsexy cop Sarah Lund, the impact of the crime on the girl's family and the political shenanigans surrounding the election of Copenhagen's new mayor. This isn't such a stretch when you know that the progressive candidate, Troels Hartmann, is continuously implicated in the murder, though he keeps insisting he's innocent and never even met the girl. The good: acting is fine (though it becomes VERY one-note as the series progresses for most of the leads), the mystery keeps you intrigued for the full 20 episodes (even though, inevitably, the final revelation was a disappointment as my wife and I suspected the real killer from the start, and even his motivation was what I thought it would be). And the series is generally well-directed, though not flashy in any way.
The bad: plotholes galore, deliberate and accidental. Way more mysteries are set up than are ever revealed, and I have a strong suspicion that this series was written 24-wise (i.e. we make it up as we go along) - except for the main culprit, who was set up from the start. Protagonist Sarah Lund becomes insufferable near the end of the series, arrogant, self-centered (well, monomaniaclly obsessed with the crime though it's hard to tell why exactly as it doesn't affect her personally), ignoring anything people tell, ask or order her, and responsable for one of the greatest tragedies in the series though she doesn't even seem to care very much. Plus she breaks about every rule in the Danish police handbook in frankly stupid ways. The story is very plot-driven: clues are not investigated, conclusions are drawn which are illogical but necessary to keep the plot moving, crime labs are either incredibly good or hopelessly incompetent - again, to move the plot forward; story elements which the audience keeps wondering about are ignored by the cops after a while, some major early plot strands are simply forgotten about, major clues are ignored by the leads even though it's obvious they're going to be very important, the police are either incredibly clever or incredibly incompetent...
One storytelling element which bothered me was that certain scenes were not shown, so that there were jumps in the narrative. But this was only done occassionally so it wasn't a continuous stylistic device, and the result of this was that certain scenes which would have been interesting to see were not shown, and others were fundamentally undramatic and just relayed exposition which could have been dramatized effectively. And a few times this way of storytelling led to disorientation and confusion (as in 'when did THAT happen?' or 'How on Earth did the cops discover that bit of info?'
So, overall, not sure why the series was almost rewarded with an Emmy. It's fairly enthralling while you watch it, but it's a major disappointment once it's over.moreless