TV.com

Ghost Hunters

Civil War Spirits

Season 5, Episode 11, Aired Sep 02, 2009

Next
Episode Previous
Episode

Episode Summary

EDIT

5.4

EPISODE RATING: Mediocre

13 votes

Your Rating: 10

"Perfect"
Your Rating: 9.5

"Superb"
Your Rating: 9

"Superb"
Your Rating: 8.5

"Great"
Your Rating: 8

"Great"
Your Rating: 7.5

"Good"
Your Rating: 7

"Good"
Your Rating: 6.5

"Fair"
Your Rating: 6

"Fair"
Your Rating: 5.5

"Mediocre"
Your Rating: 5

"Mediocre"
Your Rating: 4.5

"Poor"
Your Rating: 4

"Poor"
Your Rating: 3.5

"Bad"
Your Rating: 3

"Bad"
Your Rating: 2.5

"Terrible"
Your Rating: 2

"Terrible"
Your Rating: 1.5

"Abysmal"
Your Rating: 1

"Abysmal"

Rate Now!

Chads Ford, PA. The team investigates a ranch house that is built on a Revolutionary War battlefield, and then the home of Robert E. Lee.

WRITE A REVIEW

Cast & Crew

See All EDIT

Jason Hawes

Lead Investigator
Grant Wilson (II)

Lead Investigator
Steve Gonsalves

Tech Manager
Dave Tango

Investigator
Kris Williams

Investigator
Amy Bruni

Investigator

Watch Online

Fan Episode Reviews (1)

See All

In this case, more equals less

5.0

"Mediocre"

By entil2001, Sep 04, 2009

Perception is everything, and right now, TAPS has a perception problem. I've mentioned it several times since the 2008 Halloween special, even if I'm unwilling to pronounce judgment on them based on apparent guilt. I keep mentioning it because each and every episode is now grounds for a public relations war.

Case in point: the supposed thermal hit in the previous episode set off another round of accusations that TAPS is committing fraud and faking their "evidence". I've taken note of several people who have claimed that this was, for them, the final straw. I must also admit that I can't imagine how that thermal footage could possibly be anything but a living human being, given the obvious heat signature of the figure. (And I've been on the record as highly skeptical whenever such figures appear on thermal hits, since the equipment only registers surface temperatures.)

What does that have to do with this episode? It's simple. The past two episodes have reminded a number of fans, the ones on the fence after the Fort Delaware debacle, of all their fears and suspicions. Those fears don't even have to be true for them to be reinforced by footage that seems the slightest bit ingenuous.

During the first case in this episode, I saw several instances where the team seemed like they were trying way too hard to sell the idea that they had caught something extraordinary. They've caught similar activity in the past, so the reactions of some of the investigators (particularly Grant) felt well out of proportion. It felt like they were, in fact, putting on a show.

Does that mean that it was all manufactured? Not necessarily. A couple of things could logically be at play. The production company could have requested that the team be more effusive about the "evidence" this time around, so it would play well in the final edit. And the editing was very poor and choppy for that case, which might have exacerbated the feeling that things did not feel genuine.

In better circumstances, however, this would have been easily overlooked. There wouldn't so much scrutiny or suspicion. But TAPS is in the middle of a public relations war, and so this will be another case ripe for controversy. I'm waiting for the first time I read a post or article where someone suggests that Jason's digital recorder was really a remote switch for the flashlight, because it's inevitable.

Case #1: Thornbury Farm, PA

I'm not sure what to think of the flashlight incident, especially when there was a coincidental EVP of laughter at the same time. That's usually the kind of thing that investigators want to see: more than one piece of data that corroborates the client's report of activity. Similarly, there was the recorded AVP (Audible Voice Phenomenon) that matched the claims of the client almost to a tee.

Yet I'm still on the fence. It just didn't seem to ring true. If anything, it seemed to be a bit too convenient and designed for presentation. That said, I feel like I'm being a bit unfair to the investigation as a whole, because I really don't have any technical or substantial objections to what was presented.

Case #2: Lee-Fendell House, VA

This is another example of how the show format is becoming predictable. The second case never seems to have any substantial "evidence", and that's certainly true in this instance. The most interesting thing about the case is how Jason's absence forced them to change up the team assignments. It was good to see, and it should happen a lot more often.

On the other hand, that had to be one of the worst examples of debunking I've ever seen. I'm all for finding logical explanations for reported phenomena and erring on the side of caution. But pointing out some bells on a wall that can sound like an old-style telephone is not the same as going through the process of showing how easily those bells could be set in motion.

This review is fairly negative, but I think that's a true reflection of my growing frustration with the show. What used to be easily dismissed for the sake of entertainment is beginning to interfere with my enjoyment of the series. I'm beginning to wonder if this series, or perhaps just the current cast, has run its natural course.moreless
DO YOU AGREE?
1 3

Flag
Share Hide

WRITE A REVIEW

Trivia, Notes, Quotes and Allusions

See All

FILTER BY TYPE

TRIVIA (2)
ADD TRIVIA
- The investigation of the Lee-Fendall House took place on May 18-19, 2009, according to the date embedded in the camera footage.
  EDIT SHARE
- Also Appearing: Investigation 1: Thornbury Farm - Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania Randell Spackman - Owner Loretta Trojak - Former Resident Investigation 2: Lee-Fendall House - Alexandria, Virginia Tracy Sullivan - Executive Director Terri Hauser - Board Member Kathleen Schroeder - Docent
  EDIT SHARE
QUOTES (3)
ADD QUOTES
- Grant: There's a lot of water on the property, which could lend itself to some paranormal happenings. So hopefully the conditions will be right tonight where we can get in there and encounter some of our nation's past.
  EDIT SHARE
- (trying to contact a Confederate spirit) Jason: We're just looking to talk with you, we're not here to bother you or harm you in any way. Randell actually called us in. Grant: We're not here 'cause you've done anything wrong. We're certainly not British. We live in a free America thanks to the sacrifice of those who fought for us.
  EDIT SHARE
- Kris: Amy and I might normally try to provoke a spirit during the EVP session but in this case, knowing that there's a possibility that American colonists were held here after the battle of Brandywine as prisoners of war definitely has some influence on my EVP questions. I personally like provoking, I do it, but in a situation like this, I'd have a lot of respect for the people that would have been held here.
  EDIT SHARE
NOTES (1)
ADD NOTES
- Jason isn't present during the second investigation featured in this episode due to a family commitment.
  EDIT SHARE
ALLUSIONS (0)
ADD ALLUSIONS
- ADD ALLUSIONS from this episode.