The TAPS reputation takes a serious blow
3.0
"Bad"
And so the short “summer season” ends in Hollywood with two high-profile locations. No doubt, to some, this will seem rather appropriate. Ironically, this episode also seems to encapsulate most (if not all) of the concerns and criticisms that were raised coming into and during the summer season.
It’s interesting to note that Brian’s final appearance focuses on his recent fatherhood. If the final batch of episodes for the third season (currently filming) fails to address Brian’s absence, then it’s a bit disingenuous. On the other hand, it’s possible that they decided to hold off on any discussion of Brian’s departure until the next batch of episodes, so that Donna’s departure could be covered at the same time. Since events aren’t aired chronologically, it’s hard to know how it will shake out.
Manson Murder House
This investigation is going to be the center of controversy for a number of reasons. The location itself is owned by David Oman, a Hollywood producer promoting a movie called “House at the End of the Drive”. The website for the film obviously connects the activity at his home to the premise of the film. Taken in context with the owner’s reactions, this seems like another case of using TAPS for promotional purposes.
The true controversy, however, will be the inclusion of Chris Fleming on the investigation. Fleming has quite a following from his series “Dead Famous”, and many find him appealing. Many serious investigators question his credibility. The episode itself doesn’t focus on Fleming’s main claim to fame: he is supposedly a sensitive/medium who has been “possessed” at locations on his own show. He is also the supposed inventor of the K-2 Meter, which is touted as “calibrated for spirit activity”, which is hard concept to reconcile.
Research on the K-2 meter is difficult, given the lack of technical specifications available online. However, as described, it is essentially an EMF meter with lights instead of a quantifying display. Speaking purely in scientific terms, this would be a qualitative instrument, simply telling the operator if a field exists and the relative strength. Any EMF meter could serve the same function, with the difference being an actual value for the strength of the field. The K-2 meter produces very little data to study after the fact, and cannot be precise enough for true scientific work.
The point is that nothing in the design makes it unique in terms of “detecting ghosts”. Since it is an EMF detector, all it does is detect EMF. The rest is conjecture and assuming the result. Recognition of this technical fact renders the “unique function” of the K-2 meter invalid. Fleming’s use of the device has nothing to do with the K-2 itself, other than the ease of seeing a spike on the meter itself. It’s his interpretation of what happens and when.
Fleming claims that the lights allow an investigator to ask questions and get a simple, straightforward “yes/no” response. Once again, if that were true, it would be possible with any EMF meter. But setting that aside, it flies in the face of just about every other investigation conducted by TAPS and veers into “Most Haunted” territory. What’s the difference between asking a “spirit” to knock twice on a wall or ceiling and asking it to set off an EMF meter? In principle, both actions amount to the same thing; one simply looks more “scientific”.
Simply looking at the footage from the episode, two possibilities spring to mind. The first possibility is entirely practical. There is a button on the front panel of the device where the thumb rests. What does this button do? Perhaps the footage gives us the answer. Every time the “spirit” answered with a “yes”, Fleming interpreted the device as spiking twice. However, that’s not quite what happened. Instead, it spiked once, and then gave a much smaller secondary spike. Rather than changing the batteries, it would have been useful to test what happens when the device was simply turned on. A number of instruments spike when energized.
To be fair, reputable parapsychologists have worked with Fleming and give him some benefit of the doubt. Their interpretation is that the K-2 meter is not being activated by “spirits”, but rather, by Fleming himself. Parapsychological theories often cite psychokinesis as a possible explanation for much paranormal activity. Fleming may believe so strongly that he is communicating with a spirit that he is subconsciously setting off the device himself. (This would also be one paranormal explanation for the supposed cold spot.)
The point is that Fleming’s reputation and questionable “science” do not mesh well with the known TAPS philosophy. In fact, one might have expected them to question how the device was unique and how it worked. Assuming as usual that the TAPS team was operating in full sincerity, Fleming’s presence brings up the possibility that there was a degree of manipulation. If the device spikes when energized, and the button on the front panel does exactly that, then how easy would it be to trick someone into using it to get “positive” results? (Note that, on-screen, the “spirit” never answered “no”, only “yes”.)
Add to that a homeowner with plenty of reason and ability to manufacture evidence of a haunting to promote his own film, and too many questions surround the events to give them any degree of credence. In fact, I was left wondering if the owner created the EVPs himself, because they didn’t sound like typical EVPs. Whatever the case, I was deeply disappointed.
Henson Studio
It was hard to concentrate on the second investigation because of the negative aspects of the first segment. However, it seemed to be less sensational and more down-to-earth. I’m not sure that I would have interpreted the thermal images the same way. In general, it could be interpreted as a female form, but only after it’s pointed out by someone else. It was nice, however, for the various sounds to be debunked. The hydraulic sound is fairly recognizable, for example.
For me, this episode demonstrates some of the gaps in the current team. A lot of the technically savvy members have left or were not wanted by the studio for the “TV team”, and that makes it easier for TAPS to miss some of the scientific details. I don’t think it’s simply a matter of editing; when faced with unusual technical questions, they don’t seem to have the right people there to bring up alternative solutions. Jason and Grant may have a great deal of collective experience in the field, but they have more of the layman’s perspective. I think a solid scientist would have identified several issues with the Manson investigation. Then again, perhaps that’s why the studio assembled the team as they did.