Ghost Lab

Discovery Channel (ended 2011)
EDIT

Show Summary

  • Ended
Brad and Barry Klinge, the two brothers who founded "Everyday Paranormal" in Texas are developing an investigation team that will go beyond any research that has ever been performed before on paranormal activity.
7.6
out of 10
Average Rating: Good
63 votes
  • Your Rating: 10
    "Perfect"
  • Your Rating: 9.5
    "Superb"
  • Your Rating: 9
    "Superb"
  • Your Rating: 8.5
    "Great"
  • Your Rating: 8
    "Great"
  • Your Rating: 7.5
    "Good"
  • Your Rating: 7
    "Good"
  • Your Rating: 6.5
    "Fair"
  • Your Rating: 6
    "Fair"
  • Your Rating: 5.5
    "Mediocre"
  • Your Rating: 5
    "Mediocre"
  • Your Rating: 4.5
    "Poor"
  • Your Rating: 4
    "Poor"
  • Your Rating: 3.5
    "Bad"
  • Your Rating: 3
    "Bad"
  • Your Rating: 2.5
    "Terrible"
  • Your Rating: 2
    "Terrible"
  • Your Rating: 1.5
    "Abysmal"
  • Your Rating: 1
    "Abysmal"
Rate It
  • Press on Ghost Lab! One of the Best Ghost hunting Shows!

    10
    "Perfect"
    We believe that Ghost Lab is one of the best ghost hunting shows on, next to Ghost Adventures. They are the most scientific in their research and get great evidence with an innovative approach to their investigations, including a complete historical background to base conclusions on. Even though we enjoy Ghost Hunters, they seem to get much better results than Ghost Hunters, going on several days worth of investigating rather than a mere one evening venture. We hope they will continue their great work in the paranormal field increasing our knowledge of this interesting phenomena. We hope they will continue and wish they were on earlier in our EST zone, and more advertising of new shows so we won't miss any new ones. Press on Ghost Lab, Good Show!!moreless

    DO YOU AGREE?

    0 0
  • Why Ghost Lab is awful...

    1.0
    "Abysmal"
    Ghost Lab is one of the worst shows I've ever seen. Not even Mike Rowe's narration could save this sinking ship. First of all, the investigators show no skepticism. They treat highly questionable findings and experiments as though they were absolute proof of ghostly activity. For example, one of the EVPs that the investigators record on the episode "Murky Water" features a voice that sounds exactly like that of the female investigator. Anyone can find a "ghost" in photos of highly pixelated smudges. In addition to these factors, the investigators are loud, rude, and irritating. This show really has no place on a science network. It's ridiculous and completely unwatchable.moreless

    DO YOU AGREE?

    4 1
  • I really love this show. Berry and Brad are very professional in the way they conduct themselves during investigations. I watch it online for free at discovery channels website as well as http://watch-ghost-lab-free-online.blogspot.com/moreless

    10
    "Perfect"
    This show is just the perfect mix of professionalism, top notch equipment, and team members that understand the subject matter. Hunting ghosts is a new and still forming show topic on tv and I really thing ghost lab has hit the nail with this show. Berry and Brad Kinge make for great commentators and offer honest disclosure when they find something to not be paranormal. Mike Rowe of discovery channels dirty jobs narrates the show, brings years of talent and his personal views as you watch. My favorite episode was episode 3 where the Ghost Labs team goes to the Chicago Liars Club, where there had been multiple murders in the same corner of the building at different times. I would highly suggest watching that episode as its a pre-teller for whats to come from Berry and Brad. I enjoy watching it on discovery channel and at http://watch-ghost-lab-free-online.blogspot.com/ . If you find yourself bored take the time to check this show out. It far outclasses paranormal state and ghost hunters.moreless

    DO YOU AGREE?

    1 1
  • Not sure the investigations are totally believable.

    4.0
    "Poor"
    I watch the show quite often and am unhappy with the fact that when you are doing an investigation you feel the need to sensationalize to much. The music in the background, the rapid camera shot changes, focusing on your own faces when you say something is happening and all the totally unnecessary sound effects serve more to give shock value and confuse viewers than to actually show any action during the investigation. Then you show a video of what you say happened but you never allow the viewer to see the action. Why do you feel it is necessary to mask or hide what is going on in the investigation with tricks? Do you think we the viewers are too dumb know what is happening or do you need time to "fix" the video to show what you said you saw? Just curious.moreless

    DO YOU AGREE?

    0 1
  • I agree with most of the comments or reviews written here. However if you haven't already read the forums it appears they are following up on some of the viewers suggestions.moreless

    4.0
    "Poor"
    I agree to tough! Also alot of setting up and taking down equipment. I don't think any of the ghost hunters take near enough time to actually create a repore with the other side....Also with a media of this nature the last thing needed is to create friction between all the ghost hunters. In order to get real evidence & science worth documenting that is believeable, they need to respect not only each other but the spirts they are trying to contact NOT hunting. I wouldn't believe anything with dog the bounty hunter in it.
    "Children of the Grave" is tragic & convincing...moreless

    DO YOU AGREE?

    0 2

Forums

See All
Last Activity
Replies
More
Less

Categories

Documentary, Reality, Science Fiction

Themes

Docu-Reality, Paranormal, Supernatural