I was thrilled by reviews and, to be honest, by the first couple episodes. After that it really struck me that this is a rip-off of a more exiting show: BOSS. Same characters, same plot, less fun. Excluding mr. Spacey's brilliant performance (as always) this show is filled with a poorly interesting story and poorly interesting characters.
Yeah yeah... HoC has Fincher on the team. So what. BOSS has Van Sant on his side and both directing and photography can't really be compared between the two.
Trust me on this: if you "like" this you'll just love BOSS.
This is a kind of show,either you fell in love with it or you hate slow but Kevin Spacey would surely ensure that you're wait isn't would recommend this show for all the fans who like to Kevin Spacey and his acting for season 3 :D
Well I join the choir of people who express deep resentment watching this show.
To engage yourself in a story don't you have to empathize with some of the
Maybe I am supposed to be intrigued and fascinated with Mister Underwoods excellent skills at playing deceitful and turning the tide of events in the political system to serve his purpose again and again - but I don't.
The theme of deceit is simply too easily identified and can be predicted in such a way, after watching two or three episodes, that you know more or less which structure the rest of the episodes are built around.
Every single person has given up any kind of personal integrity. They can the threatened or bought to do whatever Underwood wants.
The only happy end I can imagine would be if the Whole place blew up.
WATCH INSTEAD THE ORIGINAL SEASON WITH THE MAGNIFICENT IAN STELLAR TV!!!!!
House of Cards was an average show in the first season and became a mediocre show in the second season. The attachment of talented people like David Fincher (one of my favorite directors), Kevin Spacey and Robin Wright skyrocketed my expectations, but the result is rather lackluster. The main problem is the convoluted writing that tries so hard to make Kevin Spacey's character look like a manipulating genious and hide the fact that most of the time he is just a lucky opportunist. Another issue is the really boring plotlines that take entire seasons to set up and then they just disappoint. The first season was watchable and had its moments especially because of Corey Stolls' character, but the second season was disappointing altogether. Of course, the fact that Frank is now POTUS unlocks many intriguing plotlines which can only lead to his uncompromising and utter demise.
as a 17-year-old who is entirely uninterested in anything regarding politics, i was surprised to find myself loving this show. in contrast to popular opinion, i liked the use of francis' depiction of his thoughts by looking into the camera: i was somewhat caught off guard at first, but i found that this detail added humor, insight, and (even more) character to the dark and manipulative Francis Underwood. Kevin Spacey is brilliant, and i couldn't imagine anyone else playing the role of Francis as well as him. Personally, i preferred the first season overall due to some minor problems i had with the second season. overall, great great great show with incredible acting skills and excellent character developments.
My girlfriend gave up on the first episode within five minutes; she was too bothered by the artifice of the main character talking to the camera. I stuck with it, but I felt the whole show was artifice, and it put me off. I find the characters unrealistic, but not interesting enough to make up for that. It feels like a good premise for something intriguing, but I feel no urge to watch more. The only character I really found interesting was the wife, but not enough so to want to watch again.
The show does everything the right way. The right casting, tempo, style of filming. The writing offcourse stands out.
*** spoiler alert ***
What I don't understand is the logic of underwood doing the killing of Zoe himself. It doesn't make much sense. Why put yourself in that much risk of being exposed. In the Russo case I understood the moment. But with Zoe it was a bit too much. I guess it shows the willingness of him killing making him a very bad person. But giving the order to Stamper would have been almost as bad and a bit more realistic.
**Spoiler Alert** You can clearly see from my score that I really enjoy this show. The murder aspect of this show does however bother me though. Are we expected to believe that the Vice President of the United States is walking around murdering people? Then we are expected to take the show seriously? This character has such cunning and intelligence that even if he was doing it he would likely work in such a way as to not get his own hands dirty. Basically everything else about it is of such high caliber. Kevin Spacey is acting better than I have EVER seen him. Too bad the writers clearly think so little of our intellect as viewers. I would still highly recommend this show for everything else that is has going for it.
the best show ever! Kevin Spacey is truly brilliant! This show is so entertaining and insightful into good ole Washington DC. I don't doubt any authenticity to the stories. All of the actors are really good. I would rate this 10+ LOVE IT
Kevin Spacey is incredible as the dark antihero congressman Francis Underwood. I am endlessly fascinated by how Netflix is seemingly changing the television game, so I had very high expectations going into House of Cards. What I got was a show that blew me away. This is one of the best first seasons of a television series I've ever seen. You can read my more detailed review here: 2013/05/18/the-netflix-model-house-of-cards-season-1-in-review/
Indeed I hope Netflix continues to produce shows like this one. Even without all of their other content I got my 7$ a month worth from this show alone. Great plot, wonderful political maneuvering. The cast is right on and naturally Kevin Spacey stands out. I love how he takes time during his performance to talk to the audience and give us insight on what he is thinking/planning, making us accomplices to his plotting for more power.
Kevin, I believe Underwood's plan was to build a real and competitive campaign then have it implode dramatically leaving only the VP able to save it. A successful watershed bill would have made Russo a juggernaut. Then when he self-destructs and quietly bows out of the race the VP would save the day and the party. Russo's bill didn't pass which weakened but didn't kill his candidacy; however, more importantly it revealed to Frank that Peter himself was weaker than he imagined, which I think gave him the eventual resolve to take care of Russo.
Liked the show, but here's the one thing I didn't get. After the Watershed bill fails due to Claire telling a couple of reps that it wouldn't be the worst thing if it is defeated, Frank is livid with both her and the reps from his own party who voted against the bill. So it seems he really did want the bill to pass... which would've meant Russo likely wins the governorship... which means the VP doesn't step down... Instead, though, the bill fails; they decide to use the bill's failure to get Russo out of the picture by setting him up with a hooker and booze; this results in the VP stepping aside to run for Gov, and opens up the VP slot for Frank. Frank acts like this was his plan all along -- but he legitimately wanted the bill to PASS and was angry when it didn't. So if the bill HAD passed, what was Frank's plan then? How does he get to be VP (or anything beyond his current job of majority whip) in that situation?
Please read the following before uploading
Do not upload anything which you do not own or are fully licensed to upload. The images should not contain any sexually explicit content, race hatred material or other offensive symbols or images. Remember: Abuse of the TV.com image system may result in you being banned from uploading images or from the entire site – so, play nice and respect the rules!