What the hell were the rest of you even watching!?
10
I find a lot of the comments on this episode to be absolutely ridiculous. And it's frankly absurd, frightening, and sad that so many of you, presumably on your own, all came to the same silly opinions. Since when is House supposed to be this infallable miracle worker who is always right? As he said in No Reason he's usually eventually right. In most episodes, he's had at least one wrong diagnosis that made a patient worse, several times he's almost even killed them. I loved that they finally gave us an episode that focused on taking the show out of this safe world where House will always eventually come to the rescue. I guess I'm just not so ignorant as to believe that they ever intended to portray House as perfection, but instead always thought of House as merely better than the rest. They have previously hit upon this idea of fallability with moments like "I take risks, sometimes patients die. But not taking risks causes more patients to die, so I guess I've been cursed with the ability to do the math." (from Detox, and very similar to what he said to Foreman in this episode), his past failure to save Hester (All In), the cop in Euphoria, erasing a man's memory for no reason (Words and Deeds), and very nearly doing a similar thing to what he did in this episode to the hypochondriac patient in Deception. Many people thought House ignored the case and let Foreman take over. When did this happen? Granted, there was another plot going on beyond the patient, but there always is! House did walk away while Foreman and Chase were bickering about the irrelevant how nice of a person the patient is, but then came back and told his team what he wanted them to do, just like he's done several times before. I'll give you that he does get distracted at the exact moment Chase says "Did you check for infection." but the fact that Foreman replied that she had no signs of an infection makes that tid bit basically moot. At the meeting where Foreman proposed his ill-fated plan, House was listening very attentively to what his team was saying and just happened to agree with Foreman. There is nothing new here, go back and watch some previous episodes. House is often just choosing between ideas that come from his team. And, at least from a laymen's perspective, Foreman had a very good case. No one thought it was an infection because she had no signs, the choices were auto-immune or cancer. Her disease was progressing too quickly to be auto-immune and it would have taken too long to fully test for it. Plus, radiation would end up treating both possible conditions. That's why House agreed, not because he was distracted by Wilson, Bonnie, and Cuddy. Was I the only one paying attention? One of you even just made up the idea that House wanted to do more testing and then just let Foreman do whatever he wanted. Another person said Staph doesn't present with fever, but look it up, it does.
Then there's the insane idea that House didn't care. Did no one else see how sad House looked and how somber his tone was? He's a character that isn't going to come out and tell you his inner feelings, so they have to be subtle and you have to be paying attention. My guess is that you are all jumping on board with the one line Foreman had, "You really don't care, do you?" Foreman was very emotional at the time so I understand why he saw House's actions that way, but viewers at home have no reason to be that narrow minded. It's been stated many times that House is a good doctor because he wants to solve the puzzle and not because he wants to help people. That's what that scene was about. His obsession with solving the puzzle in no way translates into "he doesn't care if he kills someone." And neither does his use of logic to subdue and hide his emotions, like he was doing with the conversation with Foreman about guilt and forgiveness. There was a parrallel to this in the conversation he had right after with Wilson, House says he told Foreman guilt was irrelevant and then reveals he took in Wilson's dog, presumably out of guilt. Throughout the entire series, House has been shown to say one thing in an attempt to keep an objective logical mind, but he very often feels another. A lot of the people who are reviewing this episode are annoyingly fickle or at best have never seen any other episode. This was a rather typical episode with respect to the character interactions and differential diagnosis process, but just because the patient dies instead of simply getting worse, suddenly what they've been doing all along is out of character. The outcome was the only difference, not the characters.
And one last thing in response to those claiming this story is not medically possible. The cases on House are real. I've heard the writers say many times that the medical cases are backed up by documentation and first hand accounts from real doctors. They may not be the common way for a disease to present and progress and they will often fudge on the time frame for effective story telling, but if a disease has presented in that way, they use it. The entire point of the medicine on this show is to have very rare situations that most doctors wouldn't even know about. See that's why the patients are with House because other doctors couldn't figure it out. So it stands to reason that "My uncle whose a real life doctor says that wouldn't happen." isn't the best argument against the shows medical accuracy.