I in particular don't like the way Judge Karen Hill Francis rule on her cases. It seems to me that she is always siding with the defendants. She very rarely rule for the plaintiffs. I feel that she needs to look at her own shows and see what myself and so many other people see and then maybe she will see where she is lacking.
I don't watch her shows anymore because I feel that it's fake just like so many other people feel. If I had to rate her show, I would give it triple zeros (000). Please take her off the air.
Just seen the worst decision in history, on her fake show, The decision had to be done on race and not law. They should remove the reruns also, it was that bad. A black man goes into a PETTING zoo.... throws 3 punches at a kangaroo and sues because the kangaroo protected itself and kicked the mans butt. It is a petting zoo, Not a punching zoo. This show is totally bogus, and if not, I feel sorry for anyone who goes on trial.
I see someone else, complained already, down below. I just saw it today.
Today's re-run "you killed my bird. / assault with a deadly girlfriend" (2013) there was a case where a "singer" was suing a guy who opened a business in the same name as a song that she had and he was causing people to not be able to find her.
Her name was Katie Presley and her song was Blowin' Up, on the show Judge Karen is shown on her iPad going through the google results of "Blowin' Up" and Katie Presley.
I just tried to find this "Katie Presley" to listen to her song and see if it was worth the trouble of suing someone over.
Well, just try to find ANYTHING on Google about Katie Presley and the song Blowin' Up.
I would assume that if I were on a reality TV program and I were an "artist" I would be taking advantage of that notoriety of it all.
It strongly appears by her tone that "judge Karen" hates heterosexual men. If you are a man and want to appear on any court TV; you might want to say away from her show. She is more likely to side with a woman more times than not especially in technical areas and issues she has NO CLUE about. If she can relate to or associate an issue with her and her girl friends you are in. That is, if she can lecturer you about a life issue she can look good about.
This woman never seems to be able to follow a testimony, seems to have no life experience. Seriously, has she been in some sort of cave? I'm not criticizing her ability to judge but half the time I think she's judging based on the wrong information because she continually seems clueless.
There was a young man on the show today that had a problems with his bowels and I feel that the judge was insensitive to someone who may have had Crones or some other heath issue that made him have an uncontrollable urgency. I think it is sad and shameful and he should sue his employer as well for allowing that kind of behavior to occur in an work environment. I think that young man is owed a public apology for enduring a second shaming on the show at the hands of Judge Karen.
The use of the N aired 7/30/15 Polk vs Sorority girl in charge of P/R used the N word and was subsequently put out of the sorority. You stated you have no problem with it's use (TODAY) give me a break. I defend your right to your opinion. But, for a Black Judge to have no problem with a White sorority using the n word in a derogatory way, leaves a BIG question mark in mind regarding you What would have been your response had she addressed you as N Judge Karen Mills" ????? Concerned Black man.
I just saw two semi-trained actors performing on the Judge Karen show. I know these shows are supposed to be entertainment, but it has nothing to do with the law. They may as well call it Jerry Springer. Hopefully people are not foolish enough to believe that these are real cases.
Show aired june 23 15. Lady mention that the other lady in court, pulled out her tracks in her hair. The judge, rudely said, "that's why you shouldn't be fake, I don't have anything fake about me" Well, excuse me judge, your hair color is fake! (Blond). whether or not a woman decides to enhance herself, should not be considered fake. But obviously, you made the comment, which means that you are fake also. Not that, any of that should matter when it comes to your court casas. we are, who we are, ... just listen to the cases and leave the fake comments (such as yourself) alone. this was my first time viewing your show, and my last.
She is ignorant, there was a show where a parent had a party for her child at a Museum, Judge Karen in her yet again ignorant tone questioned " Why a museum? I did not know the museum was popular for kids parties? She is uneducated and ignorant, some of us raise our children with culture. When she pulls out that fan, unprofessional!. Her menopause kicking in I suppose, her bleached blonde wigs, she looks like a damn fool!
I was shocked to learn that this show is fake!!!! It's totally scripted. I know this to be true because my son was on this show. Shame on should at least let the viewers know. I'm now inclined to believe that all the court shows are phony!!!
She ruled that case totally wrong bcuz if provoked anything man or animal they are going to protect themselves especially if someone punches you in the face, that was a rediculous ruling. Yeah you have a duty to protect the public but what about protecting the animals from the public. Then she totally disregarded the fact that the plantiff started his testimony out right with a lie saying the kangaroo just jump and attacked him for no reason. That whole case she just handled totally wrong.
Just a quick factual error by Judge Karen on a recent show. The Doctor of Chiropractic degree is a four year clinical doctorate program after one's undergraduate education. Licensed in all 50 states after four national board exams. They are recognized as portal of entry or primary care providers in all states and are part of the VA, military and medicare programs. Her understanding of the education was found to be false propaganda in Wilk et al vs. AMA et al (Supreme Court case).
Judge Karen must be telling a big fat lie , she treated that man like dirt but most adults have had accidents in their pants before! Certain foods or getting upset , lots of different reasons but it does happen and I am sure there has been a time in her life that if she had not made it to a toilet asap she would have shit her pants too! Karen are you human? Almost everyone I have asked have said they either had an accident or just narrowly made it to that beautiful toilet seat in the nick of time! Shame on you for making fun of that poor man. I won't watch your show after this!
Hey, I think I've watched just about every courtroom show known to man. I'm finally getting use to Judge Judy and Judge Mathis but Judge Karen, not so much. It's gonna take a long time because to me she just doesn't seem that compassionate. I know this is the get over it era and my bad and who cares, deal with it, that's on you and you need to find your own way but she's right there in the mix. I remember one case in particular where a woman was talking about the emotional distress she suffered. She took the time to bring in evidence and was throughly embarrassed in front of the studio audience not to mention millions that tune into see the show. I know it's her job to judge but remember things can happen to you as well. One case she was judging how fast some woman got involved with a guy. The guy was just as nasty and did his part but the judge made her an example. I know that women should have pride but so should men. The bible doesn't make exceptions for them. She's too quick to laugh at situations that she feels can't happen to anyone like herself and that annoys me. When she's not being mean the cases themselves are boring. I think she picks the ones that look entertaining and they would be if she didn't take the time to belittle the people for being a little different.
ok why is that every time someone says they don't agree with the gay community that that person is automatically racist against black people. this judge us crazy to say this man on todays episode, if he don't like gays she could imagine what he thinks about black people. what no this man is running a survival camping trip with boys and their father. when he found out both of them were the father because they were in fact a gay couple, he made it uncomfortable for the men which is wrong. the way he expressed himself wasn't the way to state that its not right to expose boys to the idea that its ok to be with a boy. That goes against God. Gay people choose to be gay, black people don't have a choice of being black. This was the dumbest thing I've heard out a JUDGES Mouth. God made everyone in his image, man choose to be man.
Today I watched her rule against a plaintiff who had a contract for a kids pony birthday engagement.
She did not even address the contract at all. It said no one over 75 lbs. The defendants daughter was over that weight. She did not pay the remainder of the contract. The judge said nothing about these facts in making her decision do dismiss the case! I don't know why she dismissed the case. Her attitude and sarcasm is beyond reason and baseless. She is sickening.
I'm not a "judge" but I at least have respect, kindness and a grip on life. KAREN is humankindness at it's lowest. I refuse to call her a judge. When she's like she is on "this" show, how would she be with the homeless, mentally disabled and physically disabled? Respect not even thought of!!!
It's kind of disgusting to know the decisions judge karen makes actually affect peoples lives. Not only is she an annoying and disrespectful judge but her decisions seem to be greatly influenced by whether or not she likes the plaintiff or defendant. She is very unprofessional and acts as if she is the queen of the courtroom and steeps as low as to insult some of people.
I just watched an episode from 09/27/2013 and was appalled at her comments. The episode concerned a woman being sued by an ex for rent. The woman did not work during the relationship. Judge Karen told the man that once a man puts a woman in that lifestyle of not working and telling her you don't have to do anything.... You don't want to ever want to tell a woman to sit down and not work. You end up having babies with her and 20 years later want to get a I have been married for almost 35 years. I did not work at an outside job but I worked my butt off raising 3 children, homeschooling 2 of them, helping my husband with his small business, taking care of everything while he was deployed countless times as part of a special warfare support group for the military, and running the household! That is not to mention going back to college after the kids were grown, taking care of my grandchildren, and now having to take care of him due to PTSD and Traumatic Brain Injuries received during his military service. Sit on my butt and not work! If she had to do half of what I did or countless other "sit on their butts and not work" women, she wouldn't make such broad suppositions. By the way, all of my kids work in professional jobs, have either completed college or are now in college (with honors). They stayed on the straight and narrow and I believe this was largely due to mine and my husband's decision for me to stay at home with them. Also, as of this year I have earn 3 undergraduate degrees and am working toward my master's and then doctorate as well as having started my own business from home. I have a fourth undergrad degree I will be finishing up in the next couple of years while I am doing my internships for my grad and doctorate degrees. All of which I will be able to use to open up my second business. All of this was accomplish while sitting on my butt at home doing nothing as she put it. Shame on her!
I WATCHED A CASE LAST WEEK WHERE THE PLAINTIFF WAS SUING SOMEONE WHO HE HAD LOANED HIS PRIZED UMBRELLA TOO. HIS GRAND MOTHER HAD GIVEN HIM A DESIGNER UMBRELLA (COST WAS $600.00). JUDGE KAREN RULED FOR THE PLAINTIFF THAT THE DEFENDANT WAS RESPONSIBLE BUT IN HER INFINITE WISDOM DECIDED THAT YOU CAN BUY AN UMBRELLA FOR $40.00 SO THAT'S WHAT SHE AWARDED THE PLAINTIFF. GOOD THING IT WASN'T A ROLEX SINCE BASED ON HER DECISION ABOUT THE UMBRELLA SHE PROBABLY WOULD HAVE SAID, 'YOU CAN BUY A WATCH FOR $20.00 SO THAT'S WHAT YOU GET. I'm 68 YEARS OLD WITH A LOT OF LIFE EXPERIENCE CONSTANTLY WATCH ALL THE COURT SHOWS WHICH HAS GIVEN ME AN INCRDIBLE AMOUNT OF KNOWLEDGE FROM RETURNING PEOPLE DEPOSITS, LOANING MONEY TOO FRIENDS AND RELATIVES, AND THE ALL TOO OFTEN "I BOUGHT A CAR OFF OF CRAIGSLIST " FRANKLY WITH THE 10 YEARS PLUS I VERY AREN'T IN AGREEMENT WITH THE JUDGE'S DECISION. MOOST OF THE TIME IT'S REGARDING AUTOMOBILE LAWSUITS. THE REASON FOR THAT IS SIMPLY BECAUSE I WAS IN THE AUTO BUSINESS FOR OVER 35 YEARS AND AM A LOT MORE FAMILIAR WITH THE SCAMS PEOIPLE USE TO SELL CARS. HONESTLY I WOULD BE A BETTER JUDGE THAN THIS, IF SHE WAS A DOCTOR, WOULD BE A CHARLATAN! WHAT A GREAT IDEA FOR A NEW COURT TV SHOW. JOHN HARRISON, THE JUDGE WITH NO DEGREE BUT MORE KNOWLEDGE THAT SOME TV JUDGES. I CAN'T STAND HER AND THE ONLY REASON I WATCH IS TO SEE WHAT MORONIC QUESTIONS SHE'LL ASK AND HOW WRONG HER VERDICT IS, WHICH IS MOST OF THE TIME! I WOULD LOVE TO SEE SOME KIND OF SETUP WHERE JUDY, MILL, AND MARILYN MILLIAN (EASILY MY FAVORITE) AND SEE IF THEY ALL COME UP WITH THE SAME DECISION. IT WOULD HAVE TO BE A CASE WHERE BOTH PARTIES HAD A GOOD CASE. THE QUESTIONS SHE SOMETIMES ASKS ARE ALWAYS A CLASSIC. MAYBE A CASE OF THE PLAINTIFF BUYING A CAR FROM SOMEONE ON CRAIGSLIST AND SUING TO GET THE MONEY RETURNED. AFTER LISTENING TO COME OF THE QUESTIONS SHE'S ASKED ON OTHER SHOWS IT WOULDN'T SURPRISE ME IF SHE ASKED SOMETHING LIKE, "SO TELL ME, WHAT SIZE SUIT DO YOU WEAR"? OR MAYBE, "HAVE YOU HAD YOUR FLU VACCINE". YOU GET THE IDEA SO SHOOT ME AN EMAIL AND LETS HAVE AS THEY CALLED ME IN THE AUTOMOBILE BUSINESS, "THE GUY WITH THE TIE".
I enjoy watching court shows, but normally avoid Judge Karen's as it seems like she has a habit of bashing, and ruling against men because they are men. I did tune in today, and viewed the case of the female who posted someone else's attractive photo on Facebook, but claimed it was her own to a young man corresponding with her. He flew to LA to visit her upon her invitation, discovered her scam, and asked to be compensated for his trip charge. Judge Karen denied it, which is unfair to say the least, as he was clearly victimized. I suppose that is beside the point to the average feminist.
Judge Judy, I believe you need to re review the case of the boy that was called names at his job because of a picture that management took of him I a private area. You know it is illegal to harass coworkers like that along with it being Management/Owners involved. You picked on that kid yourself. The defendants admitted to taking the picture and the name calling - yet you came down on the kid. I felt you were a bully and it was horrible to watch.. I don't care if it is an act or for real.. please re review that case. You will see that Harrassmen/bulling was done and not only by the young man's former employer but also by you. Would you want something like that to happen to your daughter or son? I bet not.
My original review said that I think it was fake and now I KNOW for a certain that it's FAKE!!! I put in the bailiffs name Shane Sousa on Google and modeling photos showed up, you'll see him posing in shirtless modeling photos. Also in the ending credits the disclaimer states that it's re-enactments.
Won't watch this trash anymore and from the fact that Judge Karen denied it being scripted proves that she's a big liar and a disgrace to the bench. I knew the cases were a little too outrageous for real court cases like Judge Mathis, Judge Judy, and People's Court where in the beginning it states real cases by real people while Supreme Justice doesn't state that. So should've known that something was up.
All the cases, nobody brings evidence or the evidence is stupid at best. The comedian thing was a joke and no real court would waste their time hearing it. Also the one girl suing over falling off a bike at a health club, the obese daughters, marijuana plants. All this show did was replace We the People with Gloria Allred with Supreme Justice with Karen Mills-Francis.
Please read the following before uploading
Do not upload anything which you do not own or are fully licensed to upload. The images should not contain any sexually explicit content, race hatred material or other offensive symbols or images. Remember: Abuse of the TV.com image system may result in you being banned from uploading images or from the entire site – so, play nice and respect the rules!