Last Resort

Favorite
653
ABC (ended 2013)

USER EDITOR

neomichel

User Score: 117

Last Resort
7.8
out of 10
User Rating
797 votes
84

SHOW REVIEWS
By TV.com Users

Show Summary

Last Resort is set in the near future about a US military submarine that goes against orders and refuses to fire its nuclear missiles. As a result the crew escapes and takes refuge at a NATO outpost where they set up a society becoming the smallest nuclear state in the world.
Andre Braugher

Andre Braugher

Captain Marcus Chaplin

Daisy Betts

Daisy Betts

Lieutenant Grace Shepard

Daniel Lissing

Daniel Lissing

James King

Autumn Reeser

Autumn Reeser

Kylie Sinclair

Scott Speedman

Scott Speedman

XO Sam Kendal

Dichen Lachman

Dichen Lachman

Tani Tumrenjack

Sunday
No results found.
Monday
No results found.
Tuesday
No results found.
SUBMIT REVIEW
  • One last review... So what would you have done?

    8.5
    Having finally gotten around to watching the whole series, and reading some of the reviews here, I've noticed a kind of love it or hate it attitude toward the show, without much in between. The love it camp usually cite things like acting, writing, and production values as reasons for watching. The hate it crew seems more concerned with what they see as the completely unrealistic scenario of a nuclear missile submarine crew ever disobeying an order to fire, and are offended by what they consider unpatriotic actions. I'm going to side with the first group, but for different reasons, and as for the second, maybe this show was never intended to be entirely realistic. Maybe it was intended to raise questions in viewers minds: In today's world, how far can we trust our governments? How far can blind patriotism guide our choices? Should soldiers always follow orders, even when they know in their hearts they are wrong? After the US went into Iraq, hot on the trail of non-existent WMDs, and with mounting evidence that they knew there were none all along, should we believe them next time they decide to use military force? At what point do people of good conscience start to question what they are told, and then how far will they be willing to go to uncover the truth?



    Maybe the producers thought they'd play a what-if game, pitting a lone submarine commander against the whole Washington establishment as a way of raising ethical questions, and exploring grey areas, in which none of the players are squeaky clean, but at least some, on both sides, are willing to stand by their principals, whatever the cost. Like Star Treks' "Kobayashi Maru" exercise, it presented a no-win situation as a test of character, and then observed how each character responded. While the scenario may have been over the top, it ultimately made for great drama. And for those who didn't like the choices the characters made, what would you have done differently? Would the world, as presented in the show, have been better off if the captain had just fired his missiles and kept his mouth shut? If the show succeeded in getting you to stop and think about such things, and perhaps even about what CNN is reporting from the "real" world, maybe that's all it wanted to do.moreless
  • Dashed Hope -turned out to be just too dumb and unrealistic.

    2.0
    When I first read about the premise -I was quiet excited and eagerly awaited it's arrival.

    When I finally got the pilot -I had to pause it every few minutes so I could recover from particular severe bouts of cringing, eye rolling and sighing.



    Right off the bat -I expected the reason for not launching after receiving an authenticated and valid launch order would have been substantial and feasible, instead it is a technicality in the method of transmission and even when it is confirmed by voice -they still don't launch -apparently because of the love and brotherhood Americans (let alone the US military) feels for Pakistan -after all it is not like US pays them to be 'kind off allies' or that they harbored bin laden...



    The cherry on top was becoming Mr Island Dictator and then launching a nuke at DC, by this point they are not insubordinate or even conscientious objectors -they are nuclear armed traitors and at best hostage takers (at worst terrorists).



    Would it have been so hard to have the president (or someone else very powerful) to directly (and thus illegally) order the nuking of Pakistan and then try to cover everything up and get rid of the evidence of the order?

    Then our traitors_I mean protagonists would have been the 'good guys' even if no one else knew it.



    I'm not going to talk about acting or cinematography because I'm at the point where I will settle for a good plot and dialog -anything else is a bonus.



    TL;DR?

    It is a terrible show that had a good marketing campaign and that should only be watched by people that think that reality tv is real -aka people dumb/ignorant/shallow enough to accept the flawed/infantile plot and the dreadfully cliche laced dialogue.moreless
  • The Show that was to un American.

    8.0
    Really don't understand their reasons for cancelling this show when there's been so many great political suspense dramas out there such as: 24 and Prison Break. Some are saying it's too un American. Well the war in Iraq was un American just like so many other wars fought in other countries by the United States of America.
  • Worst show on TV

    1.0
    The show's tag line is "Honor in Defiance" as if disobeying an order to fire on the enemy could be considered even remotely patriotic. The plot is infantile at best; even with a good dose of suspension of disbelief, accepting the premise that the highly trained crew of a nuclear US submarine would doubt valid launch codes because they're transmitted on a backup channel is laughable. Launch orders with valid codes would be obeyed if they arrived by carrier pigeons landing on deck. Indeed, this show would be ridiculous was it not for the disturbing anti-american message. To reinforce this, even China, a country with a record of egregious human rights violations is portrayed as being more diplomatic and reasonable to the mutineers than our own government. This is basically a liberal, leftist, poorly writen show, and I'm glad it's finally cancelled.moreless
  • Gutted.

    8.0
    Man i was really getting into this show. After an awesome pilot it kinda lost its way for a few episodes but towards the end picked up again. And if you read the interviews with Shawn Ryan after the finale it seemed like it was going in a really cool direction.
  • NO, WE DON'T MEAN FRIDAYS

    TV's Most Dangerous Timeslots

    In recent history in particular, it feels like more and more timeslots have grown increasingly dangerous.

  • YOU'RE GOING TO LIKE THIS ONE

    News Briefs: FX Orders The Bridge to Series

    Plus: The BBC cancels The Hour, Andre Braugher surfaces on a new show, and Arrow promotes a fan favorite.

  • More
    Less

    More Info About This Show

    Categories

    Drama