(spoilers here)
A stellar performance from Donna Murphy as the upstanding wife of a cad is the best of this episode. Acting and production values are very good here, but Goren and Eames are not written as Holmes and Watson, as was also the case in the disappointing "The War at Home". Too bad. The blow-torch brilliance of Goren's intellect supported ably by Erbe's sterling portrayal of the appreciative and insightful partner is again undermined by pedestrian writing by Marsha Norman. This plot is just like 100 others on TV today; just better acted and produced.
I don't know what Dick Wolf is up to, perhaps he's tired of all the Law & Order series, but the writing recently in all has been well-below par. It would be better if some of the original writers, such as the stellar Stephanie Sengupta, were brought in to show the current batch of uninspired underachievers "how it's done".
For example, a terrific chance to show Goren's Holmesian observational powers, namely, how and where the sniper worked, is rushed and handed off to a dry CSU with only side-comments by Goren.
When the garrote is found on the husband, Goren does NOT immediately suspect a plant / frame-up. These are clearly writers who do not read Sherlock Holmes, and are unaware of the preceeding 5 years of character development for Goren and Eames. That's just lazy.moreless





