A church employee is killed, apparently for money from collections, and investigation reveals embezzlement from the church, a secret relationship from many years ago with a woman, and a violent, young, illegitimate sonmoreless
3.0
"Bad"
This was an unimpressive entry in an intelligent series. Acting and technical details were professional, as always. Goren contributed some distinctive touches, but there were signs of a problem even there.
In a gratuitous scene, Goren stands high on the back of church pews, pawing for balance at the heads and shoulders of police photographers, who are obviously annoyed. I was likewise disappointed by a scene in an earlier episode when I found out that one of my favorite shots from the opening credits -- Goren leaning halfway over to the side in the interrogation room -- was a completely unnecessary, if not counterproductive, gesture, taken after he had already convinced a reluctant suspect to start writing a telephone number and confession. Goren's mannerisms should not be manufactured as a gimmick to serve as cheap oddity or slapstick humor.
But the serious problem here was that the story line was not interesting or original, just dismal. The motivations and themes were forced or hopelessly muddled. By creating a vivid, detestable villain in the son but basing the story on the priest instead, and then abruptly dropping the son completely, the plot zig-zagged uncomfortably, and there was never any satisfying confrontation between right and wrong. The writers have the priest engage in outrageously bad behavior -- breaking his vows, stealing large sums from the church for years for the sake of an illicit relationship, covering up all of that misconduct and apparently one murder, and, incredibly, committing another -- yet present him as some sort of conflicted, sympathetic sad sack who does good works for the poor. The portrayal was confused, strained, unconvincing, and unsatisfying, the acting tortured and adrift.
The plot hinged on the situation of an "innocent third party" who the priest and Goren seemed willing to go to any lengths to protect. Yet, the story completely dropped the ball on creating a predicament so vivid and desperate that it even came close to justifying going to such extremes, as Eames herself observed. Why, compared to the alternatives, would the world have ended for the person if the truth had come out? Was there no legal, responsible way to handle this -- nothing short of murder, by a supposedly humane person? Rather than taking the time to develop a rich, compelling portrait, the writers skated over the surface of the "third party" and her situation, evoking little or no feeling. And if protection were so powerful a motivation, and the man were in fact so fundamentally decent, then it would not have taken all of Goren's admittedly eloquent but aggrandizing exhortations and going behind Carver's back (drawing a sharp, deserved rebuke) to get a guilty plea. In fact, the entire turn of the story toward a claimed homosexual relationship and "battered spouse" defense seemed like cheap sensationalism and plot contrivance.
If the writers were trying to say anything original, affecting, or meaningful about any of this, it came across as a mess, and a pretentious one at that. The implausible, contrived lengths the episode went to appear shocking and different should not be confused for genuine quality, as some shallow, naive, flowery praise would have it.moreless