Despite their odd fandom rivalry, Rugrats and SpongeBob are actually quite similar; both were Nickelodeon money-makers which both went downhill after their respective movies.
5.0
"Mediocre"
Rugrats, as well as being one of the first three Nicktoons ever made (alongside Doug and Ren and Stimpy), was also formerly the most successful show on the network, at least until SpongeBob came along. Now a classic in the eyes of nostalgists, Rugrats represents the old-school Nickelodeon... well, at least the first few seasons did. Slowly, like SpongeBob (but not exactly as apparent), the show went downhill, until the final straw that was Dil was introduced into the main cast. According to TV lore, new characters who are introduced into the core cast of a show usually scream trouble, and I feel this was the same case with Dil. It only worsened when they added Kimi in season 7, and after another two seasons, the show was finally cancelled.Rugrats follows the adventures of a group of (originally four) talking babies; Tommy, Chuckie, and twins Phil and Lil (then later on, Dil and Kimi), who explore the (often frightening) world around them, while also having to deal with the local villain, Angelica. The original concept and premise was wonderful, and could easily appeal to everyone.The characters were originally lovable, even the adults. Tommy was the brave leader kids wanted to be, and Chuckie was the scaredy-cat some kids could relate to. However, Phil and Lil did like to engage in gross habits, but I wouldn't say that completely detracted their characters (at first). Also, despite the fact that Angelica was the resident villain, she did have her moments in some episodes. Meanwhile, the adults also held their own. Stu Pickles was the crazy inventor who was trying to build the toy that would become his big break, while Grandpa Lou was the sleepy old man (who was arguably, probably one of the best characters on the show). However, in the later seasons featuring Dil and Kimi, I felt that Dil was a poor character because he couldn't speak or move, and most episodes focused on the babies looking after him all the time. Kimi, to me, felt like a female clone of Tommy, making her character look dull.The stories for the episodes were OK at first. The babies' imaginations was what really made the episodes enjoyable to watch, but in later seasons, episodes later relied more on the toiler humour that had always plagued the show (which I will talk about in the next paragraph), mostly because of Dil being in the group.The humour relies on the dreaded toilet humour that is now commonly-seen in cartoons today. While it wasn't as problematic as in later seasons, I would say that if I was writing this review before Dil was introduced into the cast, I would have given the show an 8, because of it. However, the toilet humour was kicked up later on in the show's life, with sometimes, entire episodes being driven on by it. (E.g. "Chuckie VS The Potty.) Oh, please. Fortunately, there were some good jokes for everyone of all ages, even pop culture references for the adults.The animation was decent. While it looked rough and scratchy in season 1, it thankfully improved in season 2, and kept improving from there. While I have always criticized Klasky-Csupo (the creators of the show)'s art style and character designs (As Told By Ginger, etc.), in Rugrats, I actually found it to be more tolerable. I would even say quite fitting with the tone of the series.Overall, Rugrats was a great show while it was in its prime. But just like SpongeBob today, it went downhill after its first movie was released. No offence, it was still a good cartoon, but adding new characters to the core cast didn't do the show justice, and it still had flaws (the toilet humour). Also, please note that I gave this show a 5, because I loved the older episodes.moreless