i don't understand.
it's funny.
i just got around to watching season 2 ep 1 and there were some very funny parts in it.
CBS (ended 2013)
i don't understand.
it's funny.
i just got around to watching season 2 ep 1 and there were some very funny parts in it.
after seeing five minutes of it the other night, it is clearly overrated at 6.6
The guys all acted like boorish pigs and frat boys and the women just put up with it. The "humor" was simply not overly funny, either. David Spade's best days were SNL.
| millerem99 wrote: |
after seeing five minutes of it the other night, it is clearly overrated at 6.6 The guys all acted like boorish pigs and frat boys and the women just put up with it. The "humor" was simply not overly funny, either. David Spade's best days were SNL. |
| lenegorgem wrote: |
| I'm with you..I love it! I thought my DVR forgot to tape it this last night and almost had a cow! lol. Turns out it wasn't a new episode. Maybe the people are hitting the wrong keys b/c anyone watching it has to laugh. Do you happen to watch "till death"? That one's cool as well. Well, keep watching...I'll be right there with you. |
| dh4645 wrote: |
| i don't understand. it's funny. i just got around to watching season 2 ep 1 and there were some very funny parts in it. |
loving this show so far, it's sitcom classic in the making already. It's up there with the likes of Seinfeld & King of Queens to me, just can't wait for it's to come back with new ep's.
The exact same thing is happening to "The New Adventures of Old Christine". The last few episodes of "Rules of Engagement" have the same number of "abysmal" votes as the last several episodes of "Old Christine", so it's obvious that there is voting sabotage going on. Someone at the "Old Christine" board thought that mabye fans of "Rules of Engagement" were sabotaging the votes, but the same thing is happening here.
How stupid can people be to deliberately sabotage a show's ratings at tv.com? I mean really, don't they have better ways to spend their time?
i dont mind rules plus seinfeld show was a classic but rules is better than The New Adventures of Old Christine tho.
The New Adventures of Old Christine hasnt taken off big outside of the states either is a comedy which isn't really that funny and no way a classic in the shape of seinfeld, king of queens and two and a half men either.
I know, I think it should be rated higher as well, I rated it a 10, It is one of my fav show, but I don't know whne the new season starts up, does any one know, post a meassage below please if possilbe.
| DZA187 wrote: | ||
loving this show so far, it's sitcom classic in the making already. It's up there with the likes of Seinfeld & King of Queens |
| pisceandreams wrote: |
The exact same thing is happening to "The New Adventures of Old Christine". The last few episodes of "Rules of Engagement" have the same number of "abysmal" votes as the last several episodes of "Old Christine", so it's obvious that there is voting sabotage going on. Someone at the "Old Christine" board thought that mabye fans of "Rules of Engagement" were sabotaging the votes, but the same thing is happening here. How stupid can people be to deliberately sabotage a show's ratings at tv.com? I mean really, don't they have better ways to spend their time? |
I don't understand it either...!
CBS Entertainment | About TV.com | About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise
© CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Ad Choice | Terms of Use
