Star Trek: The Next Generation

Season 6 Episode 23

Rightful Heir

6
Aired Unknown May 17, 1993 on CBS
7.3
out of 10
User Rating
159 votes
6

EPISODE REVIEWS
By TV.com Users

Episode Summary

EDIT
Stardate: 46852.2 While on a quest to summon a vision of Kahless, Worf questions his faith when the real Kahless rises from the dead to lead the Empire.

Watch Full Episode

Your Autoplay Preference: On | Off

Who was the Episode MVP ?

Today
11:00am
BBC
12:00pm
BBC
1:00pm
BBC
Wednesday
11:00am
BBC
12:00pm
BBC
1:00pm
BBC
Thursday
11:00am
BBC
12:00pm
BBC
1:00pm
BBC
2:00pm
BBC
3:00pm
BBC
4:00pm
BBC
5:00pm
BBC
6:00pm
BBC
7:00pm
BBC
SUBMIT REVIEW
  • They should have cast Jim Hellwig as Kahless.

    6.0
    Klingon writer Ron Moore shows his affection for the original Star Trek series by resurrecting a throwaway character from the episode "The Savage Curtain" in this Worf episode inspired by the science of Jurassic Park. While the story is handicapped by its contrived nature (isn't it amazing that Worf happens to pick just this time to try to rediscover his religion?) and its heavy-handed messages about faith and belief (it's the words that matter, darn it! The words!), "Rightful Heir" would still probably be a very good episode if there was a knockout, memorable performance from Kahless, the Klingon Messiah. Instead, he comes across as ordinary (and sounds like Bob Hope with a heavy smoking habit) and the episode lacks punch as a result.moreless
  • Not just another boring Worf episode. The return of Kahless divides Klingons and has a thing or two to say about the religious landscape in our own society.

    10
    Many people have written this off as just another boring Worf episode, and while it's tempting to do so at first, "Rightful Heir" is now one of my favorite TNG episodes. It is one of the first ever attempts on TNG to deal with the subject of religion, and here it is addressed tastefully and in a way that makes for good science fiction. The return of Kahless brings about division and distrust between Klingons, and Worf is thrust into the middle of a spiritual dispute when his own faith is on rocky ground. But substitute Kahless for, say Jesus, and it doesn't take long to realize that this episode is not really about Klingons at all, but really about today. At the episode's conclusion we are reminded that perhaps the teachings of Kahless are more important than whether or not he will return. Particularly in Christianity there is a great focus on Jesus as a divine being, and Jesus the moral teacher often gets lost in the shuffle. This episode makes great points but in enough of a sci-fi manner that you still have to dig for them. Don't write this one off.moreless
  • Another dull Worf episode.

    7.0
    Once "Redemption" happened, the writers needed to find something to keep Worf's character interesting. In the 5th season they tried giving him a son, which failed miserably. In the 6th season, they tried to explore his Klingon persona - first in "Birthright", then in "Rightful Heir".



    Unfortunately, what drove Worf's strength as a character in the first four seasons - the character as a tormented outsider, struggling to find his place among his people - is totally absent in these episodes. Worf is an insider largely at peace with his identity as a Klingon. To make it worse, his Klingon interlocutors are generally dull; only Gowron really adds any interest here.



    Not a total waste of time (more interesting than "Birthright"), but you'd have to wait for season 2 of DS9 to get another good Klingon episode.moreless
  • Send in the Clones

    5.0
    Some mysteries are best left... well... mysterious. Klingon spiritual beliefs fall into that category. Worf was one of my favorite characters on Deep Space 9, but it was hit-and-miss on TNG.



    In this episode, writers attempted to explore Worf's spiritual beliefs, brought on by a crisis in faith begun a few episodes before. So he shows up late for work, his quarters are filled with smoke and he ends up in hippy garb, his hair down, trying to meditate in a cave. A fellow supplicant gets a vision of Kahless. Then Worf himself sees the ancient Klingon warrior.



    Hard to tell if it's all real or if Worf has just been hanging at a Phish concert.



    Nope, it seems Kahless has returned to lead Klingons back to the right path.



    As ancient Klingon warriors go, Kahless is pretty tame. Despite picking up his batliff, (which is odd since Worf later goes in pursuit of this long-lost object on Deep Space 9), Kahless seems pretty philosophical and serene. No violence, no anger, no aggression. In fact, dude's kind of boring.



    We find out Kahless is actually a poorly prepared clone -- a fact that doesn't really seem to bother anyone. Worf grapples briefly with the fact, but quickly moves on to put Kahless in charge of restoring morality to the Klingon Empire.



    In the end, we learn nothing about Klingon spirituality, except for a few goofy trappings, and Worf comes off like a petulant dolt rather than a serious person. Worse, he seems like a knee-jerk reactionary babbling on about the old ways and old beliefs and returning to a moral path.



    Whatever happened to the Klingons' warrior ways? None of this seems in character for the Klingon culture.



    moreless
  • Klingon empire is threatened by a newcomer...again!

    7.0
    It's time for another episode like "Redemption" and "Reunion." Forgoing the "re" prefix this time, Rightful Heir focuses on a sort of cool premise - THE Klingon hero from history, Kayless, comes back from the dead and challenges the Klingon Empire leadership. The twist where he's actually a clone is pretty interesting; I guess the problem with this episode is this type of "threat to the empire" plot has been done, and the plot unfolds a little too slowly in the last half (which basically consists of Gowron complaining with Worf/Kayless)...



    The ending is pretty neat, and definitely makes sense. A figurehead can be a good thing. Season 6 has done an okay job of making Worf "a Klingon for all seasons" (vice Season 5 when he was on daddy patrol), but I just wish the plots have been more engaging (like "Sins of the Father" as an example). Instead, it seems like we're recycling material.moreless
Patrick Stewart

Patrick Stewart

Captain Jean-Luc Picard

Jonathan Frakes

Jonathan Frakes

Cmdr. William T. Riker

Brent Spiner

Brent Spiner

Lt. Cmdr. Data

Gates McFadden

Gates McFadden

Dr. Beverly Crusher

Marina Sirtis

Marina Sirtis

Counsellor/Lt. Cmdr. Deanna Troi

Michael Dorn

Michael Dorn

Lt./Lt. Cmdr. Worf

Alan Oppenheimer

Alan Oppenheimer

Koroth

Guest Star

Norman Snow

Norman Snow

Torin

Guest Star

Charles Esten

Charles Esten

Divok

Guest Star

Robert O'Reilly

Robert O'Reilly

Gowron

Recurring Role

Majel Barrett

Majel Barrett

Computer Voice

Recurring Role

Trivia, Notes, Quotes and Allusions

FILTER BY TYPE

  • TRIVIA (2)

    • Kahless, who is revealed to be a clone, is found to have identical DNA to the blood on the knife which Gowron brings aboard. However in the next episode "Second Chances", Dr. Crusher says that a clone will always have a "genetic drift" in their DNA pattern--how come it was not detected in Kahless?

    • The last time that a Klingon Emperor ruled is in question. According the Klingon stories, Kahless existed 1,500 yrs ago. In the episode "Sins of the Father", Worf's nurse tells Picard that Mogh was loyal to the "emperor", that appears to be 20-30 yrs ago. In this episode, "Rightful Heir," it is said there hasn't been an emperor in 300 years.

  • QUOTES (2)

    • Worf: I do not know what to believe.
      Kahless: You doubt the real Kahless will return one day? You doubt that he is still waiting for you in Sto-Vo-Kor? Kahless left us, all of us, a powerful legacy. A way of thinking and acting that makes us Klingon. If his words hold wisdom and his philosophy is honorable, what does it matter if he returns? What is important is that we follow his teachings. Perhaps the words are more important than the man.

    • Chancellor Gowron: Have you ever fought an idea, Picard? It has no weapons to destroy, no body to kill!

  • NOTES (2)

  • ALLUSIONS (0)

More
Less