Sci Fi often explores the baser side of humanity through the lens of the future, and Starhunter is no exception. Carvaggio's demand that Percy study her history lessons is a cue to the viewer that we should study our history as well. Many of the medical breakthroughs of the 20th 21st century owe their roots to the horrendous human testing Hitler's scientist conducted on genocide victims. This episode revisits the theme of advancement through genocide, as humans face a new development in their genetic evolution the Divinity Cluster. Luc represents humanity in this episode. She struggles with her emotional response to the genocide on Calypso, where she was a soldier. Yet, her role as double agent for the Orchard demands that she collect the data that the evil Doctor Novak gained through his atrocious human testing. The episode leaves the ethical dilemma unanswered. What is the right thing to do: ignore the results of unethical human testing or use the results to benefit humanity in the future?
In their quest for dramatic effect, the producers have Dante act out of character. Why would Dante turn his back on the doctor's girlfriend and let her leave the room for cocktails? No experienced bounty hunter would allow her to leave the room. All said, I applaud the producers for trying to take on such a contentious issue. However, I think they could have used a little more finesse in doing so.moreless
