You know the Mel Brooks line, "You changed it...to Latrine?" Likewise, "You broke...into a prison?"
9.4
I completely forgot that I had yet to write a response to "Folsom Prison Blues" because I had skipped it to write about "What Is and What Should Never Be," I was too excited to get my thoughts down on paper (the proverbial kind) to go in order.
That really sums up my feelings on the episode. "Folsom Prison Blues" – and "Hollywood Babylon," to an extent, are both the quintessential standalone, which is fine, but has the feeling of being overwhelmingly average when the viewer's mind automatically compares it to grand slams like "Roadkill" and "Heart." (If only we had known Madison for more than one episode, then I would have called "Heart" an in-the-park home run, like Ichiro's at the All-Star game...priceless...)
Heh. I just thought about the scene in which the Boys are outside the prison walls in their orange finery – the state prison is in the next town over, and possibly the best signs in the world are posted on the street right outside it. "State Penitentiary – Do Not Stop for Hitchhikers." Funny, but in a way rather scary, too...
Of course it wouldn't be scary in the Supernatural universe, where apparently there is no truly hardened criminal, only corrupt officials. Well, with the exception of the Benders and of the demented ghosts, who can also be of serial killers. But you agree, right? In "Asylum," it's not the ghosts of the scary psycho killers who are in any way evil, but the doctor; here, there is intraprison tension but one of the major antagonists easily reveals that he has self-confidence issues, and el que no es humano turns out to be a nurse. Now, I'm as big of a fan of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest as the rest, but there's usually a reason people are in jail. In the Boys' case, of course, the reason is that they wanted to be caught – but that's not true for many others.
I did enjoy the special effects of the nurse's ghost. Overall, this episode wasn't terrifying, but the treatment of the ghost was spooky enough. And why? I know! It's what I've been carping on about – Lovecraftian horror. We see none of the ghost in the first attack, only its eyes in the second, and it's only in the third that we finally see its form – which is freaky enough in and of itself. A part of that, of course, has to do with the dramatic tension of revealing that the Boys were wrong (because obviously serial killers can die peacefully and go to whatever afterlife Supernatural's tPtB have up their sleeves), but it also has to do with the structural mechanics of a good horror flick. You can't play your cards too early.
You know ghost logic, while it can get convoluted or twisted, is at least based in actual crimes. By "convoluted or twisted" I'm referring to cases like the nurse thinking Dean is guilty for hunting el que no es humano, or that the guard is guilty for letting the Boys go, or from season one, Constance attempting to murder Sam even though he hasn't been unfaithful (well, according to him...) Even though ghosts vaguely bend the rules, as the Boys have stated, they have patterns (as opposed to demons). And the actual crimes and guilt are something you can understand – it's not something existential. *cough*Kafka*cough* ...I just finished "The Trial," he's fresh in my mind.
Surprisingly enough, too, I didn't have a problem with this episode breaking my perception of the fourth wall. That was nice.