With the TV.com end of the year awards and pollscoming and also the Golden Globes nominations coming out, it got me thinking. These awards show people must have some preconcieved notion or stereotypical biasin mind when they think about Supernatural and considering it for award nominations.
If they had an award for NOT getting awards or even nominations, I think that Supernatural would win. Even on this sites' less professional and just fan based polls, Supernatural doesn't get the credit it deserves.
Until Jensen Ackles, Jared Padalecki [sp]?, (and Mischa Collins and Jim Beaver etc.)some of the directors,and/or just the whole show overall gets a nominationfor either a Golden Globe, an Emmy or any other major TVaward(or even justa TV.combest of the year nomination), it should get the "Always snubbed show" award. (lol)
I think that every single year that those award nominations come out, Supernatural should just be listed asa permant "snub" when writing articles about "snubs and surprises" etc. until there ARE nominations for the show.
Anybody agree or disagree?