The 88th Annual Academy Awards

One of the main differences between art and real life is probably all the murder. Both art and real life involve A LOT of murder (so much murder) but the difference is that when it comes to art the murder tends to be fake. Rubber prosthetics, floppy knives, syrup-filled squibs, excellent one-liners delivered by Robert Englund, that kind of thing. But in real life... Well, let's just say that newspapers should be called UPSETTINGpapers because nothing is more upsetting than real life these days, or all days. Real life is an absolute nightmare, so much so that we watch fake nightmare movies in order to cheer ourselves up about it.
The reason why this year's Oscars felt more fraught than usual is because more than ever in recent memory everyone is angry and scared about the world. A lot of people are angry and scared about being murdered in the streets by cops and a lot of other people are doth protesting so much about creating the system that makes all this murder possible. HOT TAAAAAKE. But in my opinion the through-line between these actual crimes and Oscar oversights isn't TOO blurry. As host Chris Rock observed, this year's Oscar nominations weren't any more exclusionary than they have been historically (and duh, the blame for racial inequality during awards season actually falls to producers and directors who refuse to cast black actors in lead roles). But! The Oscars are a very huge-deal communal thing we all look to, and sometimes it's dispiriting to look at a huge-deal communal thing year after year and realize your particular demographic isn't reflected in it in any way, especially when your community is feeling so much pain already. Causation can be complicated, but the end effect is usually simple: Exclusion is subtly dehumanizing, and dehumanization makes it easier for people to... Well, pick up an UPSETTINGpaper and see for yourself.
To put it another way, real life is a turf war on a global scale and I'd rather hear both sides of the tale. See, it's not about races, but rather just places and faces. And where your blood comes from is where your space is. I've seen the bright get duller, and to be honest? I'm not going to spend my life being a color.

Just kidding sorry.
But look, if you are wondering if the Oscars was the correct place to exercise societal angst, my opinion is YES. At the very least it starts a conversation that should always be had, but even better it makes the Oscars extra awkward and uncomfortable and therefore more entertaining than usual. In fact, all the pointed political jokes made the Oscars seem not as worthless as it usually is. You know? Substance at a trophy fiesta? Who knew this was even possible!
The 88th Academy Awards was extremely long but I enjoyed it for the most part. Mad Max won a ton, plus I laughed more than I expected. Let's talk about the Oscars.

We began with a CGI cartoon of a bunch of jellyfish taking a sh*t on an Oscar. I am pretty sure it was a metaphor for something but I will have to get back to you about what it was.

We also got the usual montage of the Year in Movies, but this year's was produced by J.J. Abrams and did not include any green-screened footage of Billy Crystal interacting with movie characters, sorry. Then Chris Rock came out and delivered a truly risky and thrilling monologue that directly addressed the #OscarsSoWhite situation. I always appreciate jokes that result in famous people struggling to figure out how to react.


Chris Rock made some really good and hilarious points and did so with no shortage of audacity, which I automatically respect. But because comedy should definitely be over-analyzed and judged for its content, let me say that I was a little sad that Chris Rock went after Jada Pinkett-Smith like he did. I don't know, that just felt low. Yeah she most recently appeared on a TV show but SO DID CHRIS ROCK. If I was ever given a choice to be invited to attend the Oscars or be invited to sit in Jada Pinkett-Smith's living room to boycott the Oscars, I would not be renting a tux let's put it that way.

Then these two came out and started handing out trophies. It was probably hard to follow a professional stand-up comedian doing topical racial humor, but Charlize Theron still called screenwriters sexy and that counts as a joke, so good job. It was weird how the screenplay categories were presented (clips from the movie, dialogue typed onscreen, Charlize Theron narrating the stage directions) mostly because one thing you should know about screenplays is they always seem terrible. Even the most brilliant dialogue looks like stupid trash on the page, so these clips really just underlined this fact more than anything.

The Spotlight guys won for Original Screenplay, which, fine. Spotlight was easily this year's most competently written film.

Then noted comedy duo Ryan Gosling and Russell Crowe came out and made the ghosts of Abbott & Costello want to re-die out of shame because there is a NEW team of yuksters in town. Gosling & Crowe absolutely killed, and just kidding.

Adam McKay and this other guy won for Adapted Screenplay for The Big Short and again that felt right because there was SO MUCH writing involved in that screenplay. Just tons of writing. The most writing.

This video sketch of black people being included in prestigious Oscar films made me laugh uncomfortably but sincerely. Whoopi Goldberg teaching Jennifer Lawrence how to use a mop, then Leslie Jones wrestling Leonardo DiCaprio in the woods (which was as funny as it was #problematic) and best of all Tracy Morgan as the titular Danish Girl (wearing a slip and eating a Danish)... All great! The cool part was that Kristen Wiig and Jeff Daniels (and his weirdest wig) reprised their roles from The Martian wherein their characters opted not to rescue a black astronaut. Guys, it was all really funny Youtube it.

100% of the crowd and viewership were confused by the sudden intrusion of Stacey Dash into the proceedings (as the Academy's "official" minority-outreach ambassador), but let me explain to you why this was hilarious: This woman has maybe/probably decided to develop late-stage conservative leanings because they have earned her a steady paid gig on Fox News. Which, fine, follow that paycheck! We're all broke! But this means she's also VERY susceptible to accepting any and all opportunity to appear onstage at the Oscars, even if the entire joke was intended to troll her personally. She still said yes! She agreed to be humiliated by Chris Rock on international television. The whole thing was admittedly baffling, but also subversive and kind of amazing.

Sarah Silverman cracked me up. She told off-color jokes about James Bond's penis, which worked for me. Chrissy Teigen loved it too:

Chrissy Teigen remains the ultimate Everywoman of our time.

I only even barely want to mention that Sam Smith came out and sang the James Bond theme song. Mainly because the song is horrible? Like genuinely horrible. But also Sam Smith seems to have conned the world into thinking he's a great singer because he shouts loudly for sustained periods of time about being sad. Good for him, but no thanks.

My friend Kyle once casually mentioned that Henry Cavill looks like a stack of polygons and I can't stop thinking about that whenever I see Henry Cavill because it turns out stacks of polygons ARE MY TYPE. Now imagine a stack of polygons with a British accent and then you will understand why the crowd collectively lost its train of thought in this moment. Kerry Washington looked great also, I've heard.

The Oscars did this thing for the acting categories, which was that the camera would roam around the presenter so that each of the nominees' faces would be framed behind him or her. I think it was supposed to be a time-saving device but it made me kinda sea-sick, how about you?

The lady from Ex Machina won for some other movie, but this was fine because we can still say that the lady from Ex Machina won an Oscar this year. Great job!

Another bit of choreographed camera movement came when Cate Blanchett did an Aaron Sorkin-esque walk 'n talk through moving clothes racks. It looked very difficult to pull off, but leave it to good ol' Cate to nail it like a nailgun.

This woman's victory began what I would argue was the most joyful and satisfying stretch of the show: Tons of Oscars handed to Mad Max: Fury Road, which by any standard I care about was for sure the greatest movie of last year and one of the all-time great movies absolutely yes. For one thing, as I may have mentioned, Mad Max: Fury Road is important and perfect, but also these wins meant that a series of hilarious Aussies accepted Oscars and gave great and spirited speeches. Like, this lady was wearing a studded leather jacket instead of a gown and had her hair done by the same Supercuts that Bruce Vilanch goes to, so even her LOOK was a winner.

In my opinion Tina Fey is very hilarious, do you agree? Steve Carrell also! Do you agree?

Another Aussie won for Mad Max: Fury Road. I kept cheering out loud and that's a fact.

Jared Leto made a joke about merkins and encouraged everyone to Google it, as though he was a 3rd grader who'd just heard a new naughty word for the first time. Okay weirdo, get to the envelope already.
Next: Page 2
I really like it this way.
Maybe pick another joke to be offended or even better, pick no jokes to be offended at from a comedian. It's called comedy.
Also after reading this I think I should finally cave and watch Mad Max. It just seems so........................................hard?
I don't no, I'll probably love it. It won a lot.
I did feel bad for Jada. That didn't seem fair.
I liked the swooping around to show the pictures of the best actor nominees.
Louis C.K. was great. Next year's host, maybe?
I think David Bowie was included in the montage, but Abe Vigoda was not.
I actually enjoyed the show for the first time in YEARS, although it had several things that I hated and were highlighted on this recap so yay. :D
TV.comthe internet."(Fixed it for you.)
No, it's not. It's just the most obvious and given the ongoing issues with Black folks in America, the easiest to articulate.
(A few of the MANY) reasons why you hear black more often are
1. Numbers: Black folks are the largest minority population representation in the US
2. Visual: "Non-Hispanic White" exists because depending on which Latin country you're from, it can be difficult to determine ethnicity at a glance
3. History: Arguably, the only group that's had it as bad or worst are Native Americans
The combination of those three things are (in part) why when people say "race" or "diversity" they think Black first. But again, a group of narrow minded, doesn't set the standard for all.
Inarritu as director AGAIN? Lay off Hollywood. Spielberg should have won for Bridge of Spies.
Spotlight for best movie? Meh. Mad Max way better, the production, costumes, make-up, story, everything.
I was also glad for Leo, but IMHO this was his worst movie, and he wins. OK. But Shutter Island, or Deceased - much better work.
Best song - Sam Smith? Ew, just...Ugh, with a side-dish of ugh.
Best movie usually goes to some movie with a strong emotional draw which is why Spotlight won.
Honestly, I would have liked to see Max take best picture and best director. That movie was tremendous and I think the academy failed to see past the hyper violence and bombastic nature of the film.
-Rather what...? ;-)
-Honestly I don't know. I love Jada, but since I didn't watch and just wanted to read this recap. No idea.
-Honestly I love Sam Smith and I'm so upset that I can't even come up with a reply to this. :-P
You are boycotting the Oscars?! B*tch you weren't even invited!
Smart move Jada, try getting a job now.
Patricia Arquette kinda caused me pain. She was monotone-mumbling like she does her CSI character. I hadn't realized that kind of thing was so in style. Or not. ("But it looks good on you.") Contrast with Olivia Munn who just then invented the belligerent joke delivery, like being internally mad about having to do this presentation when there are so many actually enjoyable things she would rather be doing.
PAKISTAN IS NOT A COUNTRY IN THE MIDDLE EAST. IT IS IN SOUTH ASIA. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE.
First one writer on this site thinks Iran and Persia are two different countries, and now this. If you guys need a lesson in basic geography and history, I'll do it for free. Seriously.
Also, seriously? You'd rather tea with Jada Pinkett-Smith than attend the Oscars? BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Pakistan was NEVER considered 'part of the region'. It has NEVER been convention to consider Pakistan to be part of the Middle East (except maybe by the uneducated).
The 'Middle East' refers to a very specific group of countries. To randomly add countries into that term because you are too lazy to learn something is not only incorrect, but astonishing and offensive.
Would you say that the U.S.A is Central American, because it lies 'adjacent' to Central American countries?
No, I didn't think so.
Not only was the original statement ignorant, your defense of it is astounding in its condescending, inaccurate, awfulness.
I dare you to spout such ignorant nonsense to Pakistani person's face.
This has something to to with the political situation at the time namely the Suez crisis.
The former Pakistan's Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir remarked in 2011 that "Pakistan, India and other countries in South Asia and the region's population of over one billion people cannot be geographically separated." The remark represents a departure from years of attempts by Pakistan to deny its South Asian identity and link up instead with the Muslim Middle East.
So depending on the political situation Pakistan sometimes want to be part of the "middle east" and sometimes part of "South Asia" So Pakistan is also to blame for the situation. It's however understandable. Like i said the political situation the country is in is complex.
At the moment Pakistan seems to be on the brink of being sucked into the Syrian war with no strategic interests of its own. However, there are serious consequences for Pakistan if it chooses to be a party to the war, which is marked by sectarian and regional rivalries. Sectarian violence has always strained the social and cultural fabric of Pakistan. Now that Saudi and Turkish ground troops are poised to intervene in Syria in support of their extremist allies, Pakistan will definitely face pressure on account of its strategic relations with the House of Saud. Pakistan’s covert or overt role in the Syrian war will unleash sectarianism inside the country. This is not the first time Saudi Arab wants Pakistan to fight its war. In Yemen, Pakistan refused to fight the war for Saudis and rightly so....
If you're a Pakistani you probably know all this so you could be slightly more understanding about our confusion.
My post was addressed to the author. One might even say that I was laughing at the author. You felt it necessary to butt in, only to try and defend the blatantly inaccurate. For what reason, only you would know.
I called Price's comment a mistake. It was your posts that are borderline racist and offensive.
If you are unable to see why, which does not surprise me, that remains your problem.
YOU were the one who decided to converse about this with me. I was merely pointing out to the author the second such error within a day amongst himself and his colleagues. So, get off your moral high ground about tempest in a teapot and the like. If this was really no biggy, why do you keep coming back to this thread to post nonsense?
Hello pot, meet kettle.
I eagerly await your next (inaccurate) response with bated breath.
Not.
Get a hobby. Take St. John's Wort. Decaf coffee only. Look into medicinal marijuana. But chill.
In any event, Pakistan never identified as part of the Middle East; as early as the 1950s it was in talks about South Asian cooperation (Baguio and Colombo Powers conferences, to name a few) and was part of SAARC since the late 1970s.
I have no idea where you get the notion that Pakistan tried to deny its South Asian identity, when it has been part of SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) since the 70s, and talks about creating such an association for twenty years preceding.
As well, there are huge inaccuracies in your other points, but there is no point debating those, especially on this forum.
So, no, this should not be an area of confusion for anyone. Google is your friend. Google is everybody's friend. Price's mistake was absurd, but the idiot after that trying to defend Price's mistake was far worse.
Why are people so desperately trying to defend the indefensible?
Also, I can not wait to use the phrase "a stack of polygons" in a normal conversation. Mainly just to see what kind of reaction I get.
But a picture says more than a thousand words. If you mesh the polygons up you can, for instance, end up with this.
This stack (a better word is mesh) of polygons approximates a human face. It's the wonderful world of computer graphics. But on the other hand a person that doesn't know anything about these things might say. STFU Montana_Kantana with your use of complicated words i don't understand. Now go annoy somebody else.
The second possibility is more likely because not many people have the stomach for complicated technical mumbo jumbo.
I am surprised you didn't comment on Stallone not winning.