The Jury

Follow
FOX (ended 2004)

USER EDITOR

No Editor

User Score: 0

6.8
out of 10
User Rating
43 votes
3

SHOW REVIEWS
By TV.com Users

The Jury

Show Summary

The Jury puts a twist on the typical courtroom drama by focusing the action on what transpires behind the locked door of the jury deliberation room. Those scenes are intercut with flashbacks of testimony and crime footage which reveal the facts of the case, and ultimately, after the verdict is reached, the events of the actual crime.
  • NETWORK TAKES EX-SOPRANOS, THE JURY ACTORS HOSTAGE FOR SWAT TEAM SERIES.

    Rispoli, Burke Talk to TNT

  • Anna Friel

    Anna Friel

    Megan Delaney

    Cote de Pablo

    Cote de Pablo

    Marguerite Cisneros

    Billy Burke

    Billy Burke

    John Ranguso

    Jeffrey Hephner

    Jeffrey Hephner

    Keenan O'Brien

    Adam Busch

    Adam Busch

    Steve Dixon

    Shalom Harlow

    Shalom Harlow

    Melissa Greenfield

    Friday
    No results found.
    Saturday
    No results found.
    Sunday
    No results found.
    SUBMIT REVIEW
    • A better than average show. Surprisingly good. Crisp. Character well done.

      7.8
      Okay -- I watched for the producer. Actually the show was very well done and I will turn in again. The writing was what I expected. The actoring above par and I was reluctant with Kerr as an attorney. He did a good job but Victor proved exceptional. What I especially liked about this show as the fact we saw the trial and the shadow jury and how they counteracted the bad. The ending is very well done as we actually see if the murder happened as portrayed.moreless
    • The Jury wasn\'t like every other crime drama. Instead of focusing on the attorny\'s or cops, this show focused on the jury members. Making it unique and entertaining.

      9.0
      Each week a new case with a new set of jury members to determine the verdict. The viewers at home could really get into an hour of this. They could watch the episode and learn all the details of what happened, then at the end the viewers got to vote if the deffendent was guilty or not. It actually drew you in, unlike any other show. Let us do something, let us have a chance to change the outcome. Of what we thought happened and how the person should be punished. If FOX renewed it for a second season, the writers could have given it some fine tuning and wrote better stories, maybe even taken some from the headlines. This would have made it even better, but sadly FOX never gave it that chance and cancelled it like it does all of it\'s great shows.moreless
    • Each week, a different case, and a different set of twelve angry people.

      8.8
      With all of the lawyer shows on television, and all of the shows about judges, it was only a matter of time until one of the most famous made-for-TV movies of all time (Twelve Angry Men) was used as the form for a regular series. It was a good series. Twelve different individuals, locked in a room, trying to decide guilt or innocence. Sometimes things are sedate, other times the jurors are at each others' throats. Sometimes they get it right, sometimes they don't, sometimes they don't get the chance. Everything comes down to twelve of the defendant's peers, and that's all that matters.moreless
    More
    Less

    More Info About This Show

    Categories

    Drama

    Themes

    Legal