| vstherevolution wrote: |
...with your bulls**t prejudiced attitude and almighty period. |
that's the word i was looking for.
prejudgement.
BBC Two (ended 2003)
| vstherevolution wrote: |
...with your bulls**t prejudiced attitude and almighty period. |
that's the word i was looking for.
prejudgement.
You asked this question on the britsh forum, I wonder what most people are going to say, You guys had a total of 14 episodes and so far we have a total of 39 and so almost 2/3 of the stuff is our idea's not yours and our show is doing better than yours ever did and if you haven't noticed Ricky Gervais is one of the producers of the american one so I think he knows how to pick people.
I enjoy the two different versions of the show and have no problem seperating the two. The British version definitely holds much closer to the "mockumentary" style while the American version has veered more towards being a sitcom. That being said, the scenarios that have popped up on the show are still more realistic than what you see on most sitcoms. The British version has much more of those painfully akward moments than the U.S version. I like the Tim-Dawn relationship. I like that they don't beat you over the head with it. I also enjoy the Pam-Jim relationship but I feel that at times they focus too much on that.
It seems like the biggest debate between fans of the two shows has to do with the bosses for the two shows. Ricky Gervais' work as David Brent is great. I especially loved the stuff from the Christmas special where he was making appearance at different bars as David Brent from "The Office." The bit from the first season when he brought in his guitar was also really funny. The big difference that I see behind him and Steve Carell's character Michael Scott is that although he is an idiot and has his faults, they show that he was a good salesman. They show you how he could have possibly ended up a manager.
Beyond both of these shows being called "The Office" and both taking place in an office building for a paper company they don't have much in common. If you accept that are different shows by different people with different ideas it is a lot easier to see them as seperate entities and enjoy each for what they are. Well written and often enjoyable shows.
| Xeroph wrote: |
| How anyone can think that the American version is better is beyond my conception. |
| Xeroph wrote: |
| How anyone can think that the American version is better is beyond my conception. |
I have to disagree with the majority of you and I think the American version is way better.
But, I also believe you have to devolop the characters and they have to devolop their own personalities and you get to know the character. I give props to Ricky Gervais, but Steve Carell man, he is just great. And I think Rainn Wilson plays the best "Dwight Schrute" (i believe it is Gus on the British version). His dorkiness and own sense of humor he puts into the show just makes it.
| bballmegan22 wrote: |
I have to disagree with the majority of you and I think the American version is way better. But, I also believe you have to devolop the characters and they have to devolop their own personalities and you get to know the character. I give props to Ricky Gervais, but Steve Carell man, he is just great. And I think Rainn Wilson plays the best "Dwight Schrute" (i believe it is Gus on the British version). His dorkiness and own sense of humor he puts into the show just makes it. |
| broox89 wrote: |
| Also, the UK version hardly makes me laugh, although it is funnier (if that makes sense). |
No it doesn't, and this post is a load of rubbish.
UK version is miles better.
| Xeroph wrote: |
| How anyone can think that the American version is better is beyond my conception. |
Amen!
| tintub77 wrote: |
| David Brent was great, but Steve Carell is so much better than Ricky Gervais. |
That is disgraceful. Honestly, that is a disgrace.
CBS Entertainment | About TV.com | About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise
© CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Ad Choice | Terms of Use
