A The Simpsons Community
Sunday 8:00 PM on FOX (Returning September 25, 2016)

I hope you have no intention of ever leaving Springfield, because Fox has renewed The Simpsons for two more years, the network announced Monday. The renewal takes the animated comedy through its 28th season and 625 episodes. 

The Simpsons debuted in 1990 and is now the longest-running scripted show in television history. The cartoon has earned numerous accolades, including 31 Emmy Awards, and was nominated for an Oscar in 2012 for the theatrical short "The Longest Daycare." The show has spawned a feature film and an attraction at Universal Studios. It even has its own star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame!

Are you excited by this news? Do you still watch The Simpsons


80 Comments
Comments (80)
Submit
Sort: Latest | Popular
This is bitter sweet because some of the new episodes are hilarious others are incredibly boring. Here is a tip for the writers NO more episodes about Lisa in spelling Bees or Math contest or any other academic stuff its really boring and stop cramming random events together and make the plots linear its a tv show not a comic strip.
Reply
Flag
Why Haters? I loved the news. its still better than family guy
Reply
Flag
Why?! WHY?!?! Please, cancel it already!
Reply
Flag
You mean longest running primetime scripted series, unless As the World Turns was improvised.
Reply
Flag
As the World Turns was daytime, not primetime. Also, The Guiding Light (1952-2009) ran 3 years longer than ATWT (1956-2010), plus ran for 15 years (1937-1952) prior to it's jump to television.
Reply
Flag
ATWT was daytime, that's my point. Meaning if they'd said The Simpsons is the longest running primetime series, they would have been correct. Include any time of day and you've got ATWT and Guiding Light and whatever else. And that's just in the US; there are two Australian soaps that have run longer, both still going.
Reply
Flag
15 years on radio.
Reply
Flag
hey...enough is enough already! I hope the lose multi millions :)
2
Reply
Flag
And in related news, the American Association of Atheists issued the following statement:

"See! We told ya!"
Reply
Flag
Actually, they said "Woo Hoo! ... stupid Flanders."
1
Reply
Flag
28 seasons.That's a lot of D'oh for Fox.
4
Reply
Flag
I do still watch The Simpsons, and it's really uneven again. For a bit, it had gotten back on track with quality writing and new ideas, but then it fell off again culminating with random, unfunny ideas and meandering plots that give little care for character. I suppose the show will keep running until one of the main cast members retires or dies, but sometimes it seems like a few of them are phoning it in already.
2
Reply
Flag
I don't think you can really complain about the voice cast. It's not like they can ad-lib.
Reply
Flag
They ad- lib sometimes on spongebob because they record the voices before it gets animated so they might do that on the simpsoms
Reply
Flag
Every voice Hank Azaria does lately sounds remarkably similar with a generic performance behind it. Compare that to the voices Dan Castellaneta does, where he really swings for the fences but is repeating himself on secondary characters more often.
Reply
Flag
"At first I was just bored with their antics; but now I wish they were dead" --direct quote from Treehouse Of Horrors II
2
Reply
Flag
When the world ends, only 2 things will survive.

Cockroaches
A still active "The Simpsons" contract
2
Reply
Flag
They should've cancelled this show a long time ago for numerous reasons.
1. They're repeating story lines.
2. Not so fresh feeling anymore...
3. The animation is too polished now. In the first many seasons when it was hand made it had a certain magic to it and just made it more fun to watch.
4. We're saturated with episodes.
3
Reply
Flag
RE: #1. They have been repeating story lines for yearss. By 2007 they have had least four different characters befriend Nelson Muntz! That's about when I quit.
Reply
Flag
I stopped watching after the 4th season..
1
Reply
Flag
This. Especially 3.
2
Reply
Flag
obviously people are still watching and enjoying it. I've never caught onto the show but when I happen to run into it I always enjoy their episodes, new or old, so glad to see it renewed.
4
Reply
Flag
FXX has been getting a lot of mileage out of "Every Simpsons Ever".
Reply
Flag
I suspect many people have gotten tired of The Simpsons and stopped watching, but there are many who more recently started watching and still like it a lot. For example, Mackenzie Davis (plays Cameron on Halt and Catch Fire) is in her late 20's and admits to being a rabid fan of the show.

Also, the series seems to be "timeless", keeping up with the times, but of course its original fans (including me) aren't. And The Simpsons was still Fox's #1 rated show until Empire rocketed itself into TV history earlier this year.
Reply
Flag
"And The Simpsons was still Fox's #1 rated show"
I don't think that this is true.
Reply
Flag
#1 scripted show, not counting reality/competition stuff.
Reply
Flag
There's nothing wrong with the core concept of the show, or the multitude of characters, or the animation, it's new writers, with better stories.
1
Reply
Flag
It is not funny anymore. It sometimes makes relevant social commentary (but the subjects got already chewed to death by the media and social media), but please tell me if you are actually laughing from it?
1
Reply
Flag
I am. Most of my favorite episodes are from early seasons, but some recent episodes would make my "best of".
1
Reply
Flag
Good show to have on in the background while doing other stuff.
1
Reply
Flag
I'm happy it's being renewed, and it is always a good show to watch if you find the time. But to be honest with no real story and the eclectic airing of the show in the last few years (you never know if there will be a new episode next week or in five weeks, then when the next one is after that), I don't mind if I miss it at all. You can always catch up and you never missed anything. Really the only thing that changes is that once every year or so they come up with an outstanding credit sequence (all are fun, but some stand out above the others).
1
Reply
Flag
I watch it out of habit more than anything, but I guess I enjoy it enough to do that at least... So here's to two more seasons!
1
Reply
Flag
I watch about 2 episodes a year for the last couple, . . it's dwindling returns both in what they get out of me and what I get out of them, so the news does not excite me but hey, if the cash cow isn't dead . . . . if the cash cow is dead and can still be made into wallets and other leather goods.
1
Reply
Flag
Camp Krusty reference there at the end?
Reply
Flag
No, just what one can make of a cash cow.
Reply
Flag
the show actually debuted on Dec 17, 1989, whereas the Tracy Ullman shorts started on 17th April 1987. so Technically this animated family would end up being an television spawning new episodes for over 30 years. Its a good thing that characters never age in Springfield cos Homer would be in his late 60's by now.
1
Reply
Flag
I love The Simpsons. I'm excited it's still going! I want it to break the record, and at 625 episodes, it will only be 10 episodes away then from the record of 635 episode. Plus, people all say the show has gotten worse. I've been listening to podcasts going in order with each episode from the beginning, and they read stuff from The Simpsons newsgroup from back then, and people were saying back in season 3 how the show sucks now (back then). So, people hating on it has been around since almost the beginning.
3
Reply
Flag
So that means any criticism towards the show isn't true? That's the worst logic I've ever read. The people who were criticizing the simpsons in season 3 were those overly nit-picky viewers that were nerdy enough to know how to use a computer back then. The show has gone downhill ever since Mike Scully took over as showrunner but at least then the show was worse by Simpsons standards. Now the show is bad by TV standards.
1
Reply
Flag
Thank you for those defending me. I didn't say criticism towards the show isn't valid. I'm saying that people back in season 3 were saying that the show was going downhill even then, and people love seasons 3-8. Now, people are criticizing everything post season 10, however I personally still enjoy them. That doesn't mean it hasn't gone downhill.

"The people who were criticizing the simpsons in season 3 were those overly nit-picky viewers that were nerdy enough to know how to use a computer back then."

I can use your logic against you. We could use that argument to people now. Maybe people now are "overly nit-picky viewers" too?

It is your opinion that the show is bad by tv standards now. I disagree. However, neither one of us is right.
1
Reply
Flag
Sorry I trailed off in that last sentence. You get the point.
Reply
Flag
I don't think you understand what the internet was like in the early 90's. It was not accessible to EVERYONE like it is today. The people who criticized the show then were passionate enough to go out of their way to express their distaste. I know you're referring to the SNPP archives (google it), but you have to understand that if everyone used a computer back then like we do today, that criticism would be a grain of salt amongst universal critical accaim. Today, despite mine or your opinion, the general consensus of EVERYONE who voices their opinion online will tell you show has long declined. Yes, there's always comic book guys, but now criticism is a lot more fair and it's because the internet as a platform is so much more of a casual thing.

It's fine if you enjoy the show still, but just realize that the interne
Reply
Flag
Yes, I was referring to the SNPP archives. I know about them. Unfortunately, I do agree with the consensus that it has declined. Fortunately for me, I don't think it has declined enough for me to be sick of it lol.
Flag
"So that means any criticism towards the show isn't true?"

That's actually not what was said at all. He's just saying he doesn't agree. Can you read or are you just fucking stupid?
2
Reply
Flag
He's clearly using the fact that people criticized the show back then as validation to brush aside any "hating" the show gets now. It's really not that hard to read. I'm not attacking his entitlement to not agree with the show decline in quality, but the REASON he's giving to not agree makes absolutely no sense and is delusional.

And your "I can't read" and "I'm stupid" response makes such a constructive point. Great posting!
Reply
Flag
When the show started, Bush (Sr.) was still President. He didn't like it, either.
Flag
This comment has been removed.
Flag
"It keeps going and going..."
1
Reply
Flag
Like a certain rabbit.
1
Reply
Flag
28 seasons??????

God even the die hard fans must be bored of this show by now

The Simpsons is extremely popular and i can't fault that because it was VERY good early on but the people at FOX cancelled a show with SO much promise - Firefly (also airing it in such a piss poor way) yet still continue to stick by a show past it sell by date by umpteen seasons.....

I will also be fond of the early seasons of SImpsons but this is ridiculous
Reply
Flag
People watch the Simpsons. They did not watch Firefly. Alas, not nearly enough of them watched Futurama, either.

Anyway, if you're going to complain, they cancelled Family Guy, too... then brought it back when it turned out to be popular in DVD sales and reruns. You know what else is popular in DVD sales? Yup. Firefly.
1
Reply
Flag
Family Guy was off the air for 3 years (going by air dates on wiki) it has been 12 years since Firefly aired it's last episode, they aired the pilot episode very late on in the run, and the movie was released 10 years ago, and the show has not been revived, and it never will be.... but even if it was revived, the show would not work without Wash so i'd rather Serenity be the final part of the live action Firefly story....

My beef with FOX is that they aired the show out of order, which contributed to it's lack of ratings and cancellation

Like i said with SImpsons, the show is very popular, it doesn't take a genius to know figure that out, but i think 28 seasons is a bit much, even for a cartoon.... it's time to move on
Reply
Flag
hell yeah! simpsons forever!
2
Reply
Flag
Ahhh, the snarks from those who don't watch the show and jump up to proclaim it as if it was a badge of honor or something. I think the show has been much better in the recent seasons and deserves the renewal.
3
Reply
Flag
they need to clean house and hirer new staff for the show
2
Reply
Flag
I guess we can consider it like SNL at this point: emblematic of its network, impossible to cancel, and will never top its first few seasons.

The problem is, SNL has a rotating cast of comedians and writers. If you don't like it in its present form, just wait a few years and maybe you'll like it later. The Simpsons has had Al Jean running the joint for what's coming up on 15 years, and he never stops finding the same jokes funny.

Every once in a while we'll get an episode that had a guest showrunner and the difference is like night and day. The few recent episodes I've found funny haven't had Jean in charge.
1
Reply
Flag
wait, what about Doctor Who? I know it had a gap for a few years but that thing is over 50 years old
Reply
Flag
It was, for all intents and purposes, canceled in 1989, and then revived 16 years later. If not for the premise of the series, it would have effectively been a reboot or spinoff, so for the purpose of determining length of run, I think the series from 2005 on should be considered separate from the original run of 25 or 26 seasons--and we certainly shouldn't count the 16 years it was off the air just to give it extra padding.
Reply
Flag
Well Peter Davison did play The Doctor opposite David Tennant (also playing The Doctor) during the more current episodes so it is really the same show.
Reply
Flag
Interesting. So would you say Star Trek: Deep Space 9 and Star Trek: The Next Generation are the same show since Michael Dorn (Worf) and Colm Meaney (O'Brien) were regular characters on both shows?

And I guess the original series and TNG are also the same series since James Doohan (Montgomery Scott), Leonard Nimoy (Spock) and DeForest Kelley (Dr. McCoy) appeared on both shows.

Oh, and George Takei (Sulu) appeared in the original series and Voyager, so *those* are the same show too.

And we've got Leonard Nimoy playing Spock in the Star Trek movie too, so those are the same. Wow, Star Trek has been running for almost 50 years straight!
Reply
Flag
Hahaha yeah, okay. It's the same character... that goes through reincarnations that are written in to allow new actors to play the same role, and to make the experience less jarring, the new incarnations have different tastes, personalities, and mannerisms--essentially a completely different person except for the fact that past experiences are remembered. But yes, totally the "same singular character." *thumbs up*
Flag
Wow, thats a lame comparison; thats totally different, sure there is one or two characters thats the same, but each show has its own story about adventures with their respective crews, it takes place in the same universe but each series has their own stories; Doctor Who follows the adventures of the SAME SINGULAR CHARACTER, there are no subtitles like the next generation or deep space nine, its JUST Doctor Who, now yes, he may get a different companion, but it just follows the doctor, its all the same story since its HIS adventures.

Why dont you come up with better arguments?
Flag
Leonard Nimoy played Spock opposite Chris Pine as Kirk in the new Star Treks. Or, for more parallelism, against Zachary Quinto playing Spock.
1
Reply
Flag
ok, 50 minus 16 is still longer than the simpsons, and I along with a significant part of the world think that it is all the same show, the story is the same and follows the same cannon, its on the same channel, and most significantly the titular character is the same
Reply
Flag
And there are still daytime soaps that aired 5 hours per week, starting before there was television, and running into the 21st century. Sorry Whovians, but you're not even close.
Even if we don't buy into the "reboot" analysis (which I do... whatever happened to Gallifreyans having a limited number of regenerations?)

If we count spinoffs and reboots, AND reject the daytime serials, I think you have to go with Law & Order. 20 seasons in the original series, another 10 or so of Criminal Intent, 16 and counting for SVU, 8 and counting (I think) for UK, and one each for Trial by Jury and LA.
Reply
Flag
i don't think we can measure it by years, it really should be measured by run time. For example Simpsons usually pumps out 23-26 episodes a season a year, whereas the current doctor who pumps out 10-13 episodes a season, however sometimes there are large gaps between seasons, if i recall correctly one of tennant's seasons had almost a year and a half between the other. And even some of the seasons had long gaps in the middle, for example some of Matt Smith's seasons had a 5-6 month break in the middle of the season. A show could run for 100 years, but if it only produced 1 episode a year, it would never be considered the longest show in history.
Reply
Flag
and yes i know doctor who's episodes are about 43 mins long, and that 2 simpsons episodes would be 46 mins, and that's why i said by run time and not by episode number
Flag
Holy crap, I was still in college when this started, haha. Will it ever end? :P
Reply
Flag
My daughter's in college now, and wasn't born yet when this show started (in 1989)
Reply
Flag
Good thing renewals are not based on being funny.
1
Reply
Flag
Your account would've been deleted long ago, huh?
3
Reply
Flag
FOX needs to move on and stop clinging to the past.

And it's not the longest running scripted show in TV history. There's many foreign shows like One Piece that exceed it.
1
Reply
Flag
Coronation Street has aired without a break since 1960 in the UK. It's a soap, but shown at what US audiences would consider "primetime".
Reply
Flag
I'm pretty sure The Simpsons has been on longer than One Piece. There is some other anime show, Sazae-San, that has been on since the 60's, but you couldn't have been thinking of that one since nobody thinks of that one aside from this one friend I know.
Reply
Flag
I think he's going by episode count, since that show's only been around since like 2000. I'm hesitant to go by that though since, if it's anything like Naruto, there's a lot of filler content where they just rehash the previous episode for at least half of the run time.
1
Reply
Flag
And then there's all those daytime soaps that ran for 40,000 episodes, starting in radio.
Reply
Flag
I'm pretty sure the next five generations of my family will be watching this. The animation will evolve accordingly.
1
Reply
Flag
They already did an intro to show the future of the show.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m78gYyTrG7Y
1
Reply
Flag
Gee, what a surprise.
1
Reply
Flag
Follow this Show
Members
5,127