I personally think Hung should win Top Chef. Its not top personality or anything of the sort. Most people's opinions of wanting Hung "gone" are more so substantial in his individual characteristics and disposition. NOT his food. Hung is the best technical cook amongst the remaining three. I have yet to hear any strong or even sui generis traits that set Casey or Dale apart. Hung is a trained chef, and speaks through his personal opinion(whish he IS entittled to). It doesnt mean they're right; but again for you fastidiously closed minded individuals, it doesnt mean they are wrong. They are there to cook. ANYTHING else is an insubstantial point particular your personal preference(again).
I think its safe to say big gay al isnt top chef "material". His limited knowledge outside 4 hour+ breakfast(s) and sauce(s), is proof enough. He's mentioned enough times that he has a limited knowledge(with a lot on just about every challenge) Casey has skills closest to Hung, She's won a great deal of challenges and has always been in top food picks(if not the winner). But as i stated; there has not really been any point made, that substantiate her as having some kind of advantage/speciality over Hung's cooking. Again the only real advantage(in generalization) that has been realized/made and stated(by the judges/chefs) is that Hung has the best technical skills. Now if anyone has any actual intellegent, circumspect inference(outside of personal preference) of who should win; please do feel free.