EDIT

Episode Summary

Malone's team joins forces with Gil Grissom, a CSI from Las Vegas, and his team as they track a serial killer with ties to New York.
8.9
out of 10
EPISODE RATING: Great
135 votes
  • Your Rating: 10
    "Perfect"
  • Your Rating: 9.5
    "Superb"
  • Your Rating: 9
    "Superb"
  • Your Rating: 8.5
    "Great"
  • Your Rating: 8
    "Great"
  • Your Rating: 7.5
    "Good"
  • Your Rating: 7
    "Good"
  • Your Rating: 6.5
    "Fair"
  • Your Rating: 6
    "Fair"
  • Your Rating: 5.5
    "Mediocre"
  • Your Rating: 5
    "Mediocre"
  • Your Rating: 4.5
    "Poor"
  • Your Rating: 4
    "Poor"
  • Your Rating: 3.5
    "Bad"
  • Your Rating: 3
    "Bad"
  • Your Rating: 2.5
    "Terrible"
  • Your Rating: 2
    "Terrible"
  • Your Rating: 1.5
    "Abysmal"
  • Your Rating: 1
    "Abysmal"
Rate It
  • The conclusion to the CSI Crossover with Without a Trace.

    10
    "Perfect"
    Well the high standard set in the first part in Vegas definitley continued over to NYC as the Without a Trace team along with Grissom continue the hunt for the abducted boy. As the investigation entered the world of Without a Trace we got to see alot more of the killers views and his reasoning behined killing and abducting the boy, which was very effective in this story and tied up alot of unexplained ends left by the Vegas team. Grissoms arrival at the FBI headquaters was very funny and added some much needed comedy to a very dark case. With a great finale and excellent performances by all, especially Nathan Gamble who played the abducted boy, this was a brilliant conclusion to a great crossover.moreless

    DO YOU AGREE?

    2 0
  • Second part of the Cross Over with CSI

    9.0
    "Superb"
    First off I have to tell you that the NZ tv people totally spoilt it for me with the Without A Trace add. It showed Jack on the train track and then he yells "NOOOOOOOO!" and Hello this guy falls to the ground! Oh I wonder what happened there! Stoopid NZ tv people! Gave away the ending for me!! (NZ = New Zealand)

    But apart from giving away the ending it was a good conclusion to Sunday's CSI! I love it how Gil personally brought the evidence because he wanted his boxes back! What a funny one!

    I love this show and can't wait for the next episode!!

    xoxoxmoreless

    DO YOU AGREE?

    1 1
  • Crossover

    9.2
    "Superb"
    I actually just wrote my review on the CSI episode and came to writ emy review for Without A Trace. I prefered this to episode to CSI but I can't figure out why. I like Without A Trace and CSI equally and what they did in one they did in the other. I found this episode more Without A Trace based in comparison to the CSI which still felt a little un CSI and more WAT. I guess Jack Malone has a huge inluence on what we think. I thought that the ending was superb and very well written. Good Job.moreless

    DO YOU AGREE?

    1 0
  • The second part of the crossover

    9.2
    "Superb"
    Couldn't review only the first part. I had to leave a review in this one too.
    As I said in the other one, I think this was the best crossover I watched so far.
    I love CSI and I enjoy Without a Trace very much, so I was really happy to know there would be a crossover.
    The guy was a little creepy, I must say, but this case was definitely well written.
    I haven't watched Without a Trace for a long time now, but that's just because it's not airing at the moment in my country...
    I think this part was pretty good.
    I still don't know what the "lab" was, though... lol
    I think the guy shouldn't have killed himself, but if that's the way the story had to go, I can get along with it too...
    Great episode.moreless

    DO YOU AGREE?

    1 0
  • Cross \over with CSI

    5.0
    "Mediocre"
    As with the episode of CSI that this episode of Without a Trace went along with was a huge disappointment to me. I think that i was expecting more from these episodes because they were making such a big deal about them. I was extremely disappointed that Grissom was in a few scenes of this episode it did not evan feel like a crossover episode seeing how there were limited interaction with the csi character and the Without A Trace characters. I was happy that they were able to work together to solve a case evan though it did not have the best outcome.moreless

    DO YOU AGREE?

    0 5

Trivia, Notes, Quotes and Allusions

See All
  • Trivia

    • Help by adding trivia to this episode. Add trivia

  • Notes

    ADD NOTES
    • Original International Air Dates: Turkey: October 20, 2008 on CNBC-e Czech Republic: October 1, 2009 on TV Nova Slovakia: November 19, 2010 on Markiza Edit
    • The crossover between CSI and Without a Trace aired together in the Czech Republic. The season 6 of Without a Trace aired 15 months before the season 8 of CSI and airing of this episode was held until the CSI episode "Who & What" was on schedule. Edit
    • This episode featured a missing person's alert for Nita Mary Mayo. Edit
  • Quotes

    ADD QUOTES
    • Jack Malone: Ever think of hangin' it up? Gil Grissom: Everyday. Jack Malone: At least you have your pig. Gil Grissom (smiles): That I do. Edit
    • Witness: Is everything alright? Wicker: Yeah, why wouldn't it be? Witness: Kid wants me to call his mom. Wicker: Kid wants an Xbox, you gonna do that too? Edit
    • (When Gil and Jack are talking about the numbers from the pager and the phone booth.) Gil Grissom: In Las Vegas we call them lady-friends (Jack stares at him.) Escort. (Jack continues to stares at him.) Hooker. Jack Malone: In New York we just call them hoes. Edit
  • Allusions

More
Less