show: iCarly
The Bottom Line: "Great"
Now, I won't really bother with the plot on this review, but basiclly it's about a girl named Carly who starts her own web show, obviously named ICarly. It's a web show, by the way, and in it her and her best friend Sam perform random acts of stupidity/hilarity/randomness. The person running the show (as in technical stuff) is her other friend, Freddie.
As soon as you've seen an enjoyed the fantastic (and possibl the best) Nick show Drake and Josh, you're wondering how a (somewhat) spinoff which is similar to it will be. Will it be one of those lousy shows that shouldn't have been made in the first place, or is it so great it's even better? ICarly falls in the middle, it's a very good, great in fact, show which features energetic actors and mostly very funny plotlines which are used to show the creative Dan Schnieder's knack for making sitcoms. In fact, this, along with his other shows (The Amanda show, Drake and Josh, Zoey 101) is in my opinion what's keeping Nick alive. The people at Nick headquarters should be thanking this man for keeping a seemingly dead network (as far as good shows go) alive.
Miranda Crosgrove is very good in the show, and it goes to show that she can carry her own sitcom with herself in the lead role. However, I can't say she's the only thing that makes this what it is, because her funny and likeable co-stars (who's names escape me right now...) provide setups for each and almost every punchline. And a special mention is needed for the actor who played Crazy Steve in Drake and Josh, because he, like in Drake and Josh, is often the funniest character on the show with his over the top inventions and "art". And lastly, the chemistry between everyone in the show is amazing, espeically for a show that's fairly new. They all fight and love and try to solve problems like they really have been best friends for a long time, and it shows that they've grown comfortable in their roles in such a short amount of time. To be fair, however, Miranda has had experince on Drake and Josh, but her and the other actors are pitch perfect in their roles.
And I don't think I really need to mention the creativity and energy of the show itself, since that's to be expected from the guy who created and directed The Amanda Show and Drake and Josh. Each episode is unique, and we never get the feeling that things are getting repititous, because each episode provides a brand new and fresh plot.
Okay, now on to the bad side. As impressive as the lead actors are, they still don't match the charisma Drake Bell and Josh Peck had on their show. They give it their all in each episode, but I guess it was sort of "magic" that made their predecessor so good. They're all funny and energetic, but they're missing that certain spark.
And honestly, some of the plotlines are very predictable but done in a way in which we "think" it's orginal. For instance, when Carly and Sam get into a fight in one episode. The setup is orginal, and so is the outcome, but haven't we seen the whole "best friend fighting" plot in, I dunno, almost every TV show? Alright, it was acceptable in Drake and Josh, but that's because it was just plain hilarious. ICarly isn't that hilarious, and thus it's flaws show.
Overall, ICarly is surely a great show and a creative one, and a good substitute for Drake and Josh. But somehow, and it's to be expected, it doesn't quite live up to it. Which, for the most part, isn't a fault of it's own, but with it's creator. Blame him for making a great and classic TV show, and then just making a great TV show.
