CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | MP3.com | TV.com | Metacritic

The Difference Between U.S television and British television.

As JOURNEYMAN continues to fight against the evil suits of NBC to stop itself being cancelled, I suddenly realised the difference between British and U.S television. U.S television is like somebody you're dating. British television is like a best friend.

You're going to want me to explain that.

When you date somebody, they need to feel loved and important to you otherwise they'll stop seeing you. If you don't call the person you're dating for two weeks then they probably won't want to see you again. And that's U.S television ladies and gentlemen. If a U.S station (such as NBC) doesn't think that one of its shows is getting enough love then they'll pull it. It doesn't matter that the viewing figures could still go up, they'll pull it anyway. "You don't love me. Goodbye."

British television, however,is like a best friend. If you go for two weeks without calling your best friend, they'll get a little upset but they're still going to see you. If a British show isn't doing so well, the chances are that you'll still get to watch it all. It might move channels (from BBC One to BBC Three for example) or moved around in the time slots but it'll still be there for you to watch. The studio probably won't order another season but at least you can watch the show's season from start to finish. "I'm your best friend. How could I be angry with you?"

So that's my theory. Good eh?

Category: TV
Posted by DryKid, 12/01/2007 6:01am  3 Comments
Print    Email    Comment    Tag    Digg this

What Will I Watch?

There was a time, many years ago, when I used to just love watching movies. Television was good but it didn't really amaze me as much as some of the offerings by Hollywood. I'd tune into a show every now and again to see 45 minutes of cops trying to catch an arsonist or what have you but it didn't really grip me. That's changed now though.

I guess the first time I realised that television really could be as good as a movie was with THE X-FILES. Specifically it was the episode with the guy who could climb down chimneys to eat peoples' livers. As a big science-fiction and horror fan, I remember thinking "Woah!" after watching that episode. Things have progressed and we now live in an era where the best television can easily rival some of the movies out there. You only have to look at shows like ROME, LOST or 24 to see that's true. Remember the days when you'd watch a television show and find yourself saying "That was good but it wasn't anywhere near as good as *insert movie name*?" Well, after watching the recent Die Hard movie, I found myself saying "That was good but it wasn't anywhere near as good as 24".

And now the writers strike is upon us. First, I'd like to say that I totally support the writers here. Writers get a relatively hard deal sometimes and they don't all live in plush mansions as you might believe. I saw an interview once with a Director who called himself the 'author' of his movie and that just angered me. He hadn't written the script - how could he justify calling himself the 'author'? Of course, the reasons behind the writers strike are far more complex than this and so I won't dwell on that here. I just hope that the writers get what they're asking for.

However, it leaves me with a problem. I actually prefer television now to movies. I'd much rather watch episodes of JOURNEYMAN than "Butterfly Effect 2" (and, if you've seen the later, you'll agree with me). Movies are still fantastic - after all, something like "Batman Begins" or "Transformers" could never have been done on television. But the truth is that television has, in some ways, surpassed the world of movies. You can watch a movie and then forget the characters two hours later but, with a television show, you can watch the characters grow and adapt over years. Recent developments in television now means that standalone episodes are becoming a thing of the past. HEROES, LOST and 24 are great examples of this. A full season of HEROES will give you around 22 hours of one story during which you can see special effects, plot twists and characters developing. Hollywood itself has accepted the importance of television which is why many big names in television (hello JJ) are now developing movies.

What do I do now the writers strike is upon us? As someone who is addicted to finding out if Michael will escape Sona in PRISON BREAK, if the survivors of that plane crash in LOST ever get off the bloody island, if Dan from JOURNEYMAN will ever work out why he and his dead ex-fiancee are jumping through time, and if Jack Bauer will ever make it through a day without being betrayed or tortured, I'm going to be a little lost (no pun intended) without my favourite characters.

Back to movies I guess. It's just a shame that I'll watch them and probably wish I was watching an episode of my favourite television show instead.

Category: TV
Posted by DryKid, 11/12/2007 8:56am  0 Comments
Print    Email    Comment    Tag    Digg this

My Recent Reviews

 
10.0 Perfect
Doctor Who (2005)
Forest of the Dead (2)
Avg Score: 9.32    Total Ratings: 264    Total Reviews: 24
Users who agree: 2   
At the end of "Silence In The Library" we were left with the possibility that Donna was now dead, whilst The Doctor and his new allies were running for their lives amongst the corridors of The Library pursued by a fleshless corpse infected by the ghastly Vashta Narada. Writer Stephen Moffat builds on the mysteries presented during "Silence In The Library" and manages to deliver the answers to all of that episode's questions whilst making it all look so very easy. One of the problems with the new version of DOCTOR WHO is that many of the episodes have featured plots which were relatively uncomplicated and didn't really force the audience to think. What made me appreciate both "Silence In The Library" and "Forest Of The Dead" is that the audience is challenged to keep up. What is the connection between the scenes in the futuristic Library where The Doctor is struggling to keep everyone alive and the scenes with the young girl being treated by Doctor Moon? Why does River Song have a sonic screwdriver? Who is Cal? Where did everyone in The Library go? Why is the Vashta Narada even in The Library?

With several strong emotional beats throughout the episode, a dramatic climax that is perfectly executed and answers which are completely satisfying, "Forest Of The Dead" emerges as perhaps the finest episode since this series returned in 2005. Amongst its many charms was also something quite important - The Doctor is, much like the audience, forced to actually think. Moffat understands that this is one of the most intelligent characters in television history and utilises this perfectly. Even though he is under pressure and struggling to keep his small band of allies alive, The Doctor is continually searching for answers to what is happening around him and devising solutions to problems. And, as the answers emerge, the audience begins to realise just how cleverly written this two-parter has been.

If you've never seen a single episode of DOCTOR WHO, you might want to check out "Silence In The Library" and "Forest Of The Dead" to see just how good this television show can be.
Report Abuse Posted Jun 7, 2008
9.5 Superb
Doctor Who (2005)
Silence in the Library (1)
Avg Score: 9.32    Total Ratings: 268    Total Reviews: 24
Next season will see "Doctor Who" come to rest in the hands of Steven Moffat, who has previously crafted some of the best (and scariest) episodes of the show since it returned. What can we expect when he becomes the showrunner? Well, judging from this well-crafted little episode we can expect things to become a lot bit darker.

From the opening in which a young girl is talking about her nightmares involving a gigantic library to the introduction of The Doctor and Donna, this episode proves once again that Moffat is the finest writer of the "Doctor Who" staff. His talent has always been in creating villains that the audience can be scared of, whether it's the lonely gas-masked children of "The Empty Child"/"The Doctor Dances" or the ghastly angels which only move when you close your eyes in "Blink". Here we are introduced to a remarkably simple but incredibly effective new horror - monsters who are not simply lurking in the shadows... they ARE the shadows.

But that is not the only fantastic concept introduced in Moffat's script. The audience is given several more mysteries - for instance, what is the connection between events with The Doctor in The Library and a seemingly innocent girl in what appears to be modern day Britain? And what of the cryptic warning given to her by Doctor Moon, the man who is evaluating her? And how does the character River Song seem to know so much about The Doctor?

The script is tight, the acting is superb and the special effects are wonderful (witness the scene where the characters are chased by a monster with four shadows as an example of this). We are also given a brilliant cliff-hanger at the end of the episode which has the audience itching for the next part.

In an already strong season, "Silence In The Library" proves itself to be a highlight.
Report Abuse Posted May 31, 2008
10.0 Perfect
Life
Fill It Up
Avg Score: 9.57    Total Ratings: 185    Total Reviews: 10
Users who agree: 2   
This particular episode of LIFE is a special one for many reasons. For me, it is the very first time that I have awarded an episode ten out of ten here on TV.com. I'll explain the reason for this.

My favourite aspect of LIFE has always been the background story in which Charlie Crews attempts to solve the mystery as to who killed his friends and set him up for the crime. Whilst the individual cases in each episode have always been entertaining, it was this story arc which functioned as the heart of the show and kept me coming back for more.

In "Fill It Up" that background story moves to the foreground for the first time. Charlie asks Reese to cover for him as he pursues his lead from the previous episode to track down the man he believes is responsible for the crime. Reese gets an entertaining sub-story as this is happening (involving a search for a murder weapon) but the search for the truth is what occupies most of the episode.

In my eyes, a season final should not only be entertaining but it must also reward the regular viewer. It's the most important episode of the season because it needs to say to the viewer 'This is our thanks to you for watching each week. Now we're going to show you why you'll want to come back to us next season.'

And that's exactly what "Fill It Up" does.

Here we have around forty-five minutes of the best drama I have seen this year. It's also the strongest of all the season finals I have seen in 2007. Through a combination of a wonderfully written script, a perfect soundtrack (the choice of song which plays in the last five minutes in particular) and an amazing central performance from Lewis as Charlie Crews (who is required to go through a variety of emotions involving anger, guilt and regret), "Fill It Up" does everything right. It supplies all of the answers which you've been waiting for whilst introducing new questions to make you want to come back next season. Well done to everyone involved in LIFE for such a great end to an ever improving show. So farewell then Charlie Crews. I look forward to catching up with you again soon!
Report Abuse Posted Dec 8, 2007
8.8 Great
Heroes
Powerless
Avg Score: 8.76    Total Ratings: 1135    Total Reviews: 131
Users who agree: 3   
And so here we are then; the conclusion to the second season of HEROES and the end of the "Generations" storyline. As Nikki and Micah rush to help Monica who has been kidknapped by a local gang, Nathan and Matt arrive to aid Hiro who is trying to stop Adam releasing the virus which will kill over half the world's population. Meanwhile Sylar confronts Mohinder about getting his powers back, Elle wonders if she's a hero or a villain, and Peter must decide which side he stands on.

Whilst this season has been a lot slower than the first, this second season final is far more satisfying than the end of the previous season. Each of the characters is given enough screen time to have a heroic moment, storylines are concluded and - as a whole - the episode is much more tightly plotted than most of the previous installments. Along the way we also lose two of the main characters... or do we?

There are still problems with this episode - Peter's intelligence seems to have decreased greatly since we met him in the first season, the storyline of Maya and her brother ultimately seem pointless and Adam's ultimate fate, although ironic, is perhaps not as satisfying as some of the audience may have hoped.

There is a feeling that this season has been more of a set-up for whatever is to come in the next one. The title of the next volume is revealed at this episode's conclusion and suggests that some of those wronged by the main characters may come back with a vengeance.

Still, this was an enjoyable episode which kept me entertained throughout and was perhaps the second best episode of the season (falling just behind "Cautionary Tales"). I look forward to seeing the show next year and hope that the writers learn their lessons from the faults of this season to make HEROES even better.
Report Abuse Posted Dec 5, 2007
9.1 Superb
Life
Dig a Hole
Avg Score: 9.27    Total Ratings: 132    Total Reviews: 5
When a corpse is discovered buried with a rose in its hand, Crews and Reese quickly establish the victim's identity... a Zen master who disappeared in 1997. With the discovery of a cell phone comes a list of suspects. But which one of them is the killer?

In a series which has featured a man found in his kitchen without legs and a woman falling from the sky wearing a pair of angel wings, the appearance of a buried Zen master wearing a t-shirt which says "I'm With Stupid" comes as no surprise. The case itself is another interesting one although, once again, it is the long running story arc which proves the more interesting aspect of the storyline.

Damien Lewis shines once again here, whether he's conversing to a horse (I'm not making this up), confusing Reese with his philosophical ramblings or making child-like comments ("I think people were having sex in that house" he says disapprovingly to Reese after leaving a party filled with swinging couples).

The main story arc progresses interestingly throughout (thanks largely to an entertaining scene in an elevator) and comes to perhaps a pivotal head with a clue unearthed in the final minutes of the episode. Is Crews about to discover the truth behind the murder for which he was wrongly imprisoned?

We'll have to tune into the next episode to find out!
Report Abuse Posted Dec 5, 2007

Profile

 
DryKid
Last online Jul 5, 2008 8:14 am PT
Member since Oct 29, 2007
Profile views: 319 (+ 3 new)
If you can see this, your browser does not support flash.
Drama King - More than 10 favorite shows, at least 20% dramas. Space Cadet - More than 10 favorite shows, at least 20% of them sci-fi.  Talk Show Host Contributite - This user has made at least 1 contribution. This user has written over 15 reviews.
My Other Profiles:
GameSpot MP3.com MovieTome
Send Message
Report Abuse

Stats

 
Level: 7    Completion: 23.5%
Rank: Talk Show Host
Forum Posts: 82
Submissions
Accepted: 2
Pending: 0
Denied: 4
Total: 6
Reviews
Shows: 7
Episodes: 13
People: 0
Total: 20
DryKid's Shows Breakdown:
Show Genre Breakdown
Drama 10: 43.5%
Science-Fiction 7: 30.4%
Action/Adventure 4: 17.4%
Comedy 2: 8.7%

About Me

 
DryKid
Hello from London, England. I kinda stumbled on TV.com whilst looking up information on Journeyman and it looks like I'm going to stay. As well as loving indie music (my name here is taken from the song of my favourite band) I'm also addicted to science-fiction television shows as well as conspiracy filled drama stuff like 24 and PRISON BREAK. So, um, yeah - this is me!

My RSS