I've Got Your Green Right Here

"O, beware, my lord, of jealousy; It is the green-eyed monster which doth mock the meat it feeds on..."
- Iago in William Shakespeare's Othello
You know, I like to think that I wake up each morning without a specific intention on my mind to destroy the Earth. Sure, environmentalism isn't something that I spend much time worrying about, and gave actually trying actively "save the planet" a long time ago, if I ever really cared about the idea of doing so in the first place. Still, I guess I do my part in my own way. For one thing, I don't drive. So you won't ever see my car spitting out smoke into the air, me using up oil and gas, or creating any noise pollution as I totter down the road. I sometimes use recycled things and sometimes I recycle stuff (though the powers that be don't always make it easy.) And if a product will help the Earth and is at least somewhat reasonably priced, I suppose I'll buy it, as long as it's a decent value. I'm even the editor for Stanley here at TV.com, and that though can do environmentalism like nobody's business when it wants to (though most of the time I feel it does a great job of not being too heavy-handed.)
So what am I on about here? Well, last week I was reading TV Guide magazine's "Top 10 Stories" section and came across item #3 - "Cable Channels Revamp!" It talks about how so many different cable networks (or cable/satellite networks as I call them -- I have no love for the cable companies) are "revamping" themselves because they're finding that people just aren't into their old, tired slates of programming anymore. Thus, Court TV became TruTV, The History Channel is now calling itself "History" (one can only hope that becoming "History" they don't literally become history) and Discovery Home Channel (a subsidiary network of Discovery Channel) is becoming... Planet Green. I sorta shook my head at it and put it out of my mind, but then I noticed while watching an episode of ToddWorld (a program I recently discovered on a DVD) on Discovery Kids a big version (bigger than the characters' heads) of the network's normal logo and a message saying something along the lines of "Discovery Kids Welcomes Planet Green." And today, watching the show again, they actually had along with the logo a little countdown bug with a clock counting down the time left today before Planet Green premiered. You know, when you think about, these little bugs are a form of pollution -- quality program pollution. Other forms of said pollution include splitscreens/voiceovers during closing credits (and I do have to thank Discovery Channel for, as far as I know, never doing this on any of their networks)
Discovery Home Channel aired programs such as former TLC programs Clean Sweep (man, I miss this show -- now there was a quality show) and Flip That House. Planet Green is being billed as a place for "ecotainment" (as if the term "edutainment" wasn't bad enough.) The programming includes Hollywood Green (a sort of environmental news-magazine program) a show called Wasted (in which a family's evil planet-destroying habits get a makeover) and even Supper Club with Tom Bergeron in which people who want to be high-class can learn to throw environmentally-themed dinner parties. None of this sounds the slightest bit interesting to me, though if there is somebody here who's excited about tuning into this network, I would actually be interested to know.
If the networks wnat to talk about environmentalism, fine, I'm just getting tired of hearing about all the time. Networks "going green" -- save the Earth in everything we do. Maybe that's fine for those who squeal with excitement every time some new idea to save the planet comes along, but as far as everyone else, I really can't imagine that I'm the only one getting a bit bored with it. Earth Day has never exactly been a favorite holiday of mine. From what I understand, the idea is that we're supposed to celebrating the Earth and all that it provides or something. So why, rather than being a celebratory mood, do I always feel this vague sense that somebody's trying to make me feel guilty for something whenever the holiday rolls around?
You know, now that I think about it, maybe this network is a good thing. Let those people who are really interested in the environment and environmental issues tune into this network. It'll float or sink based on how many people are really interested in this. Other networks -- for the rest of us -- 'nuff already, 'k?
Posted by agent_0042, 06/04/2008 8:00pm 4 Comments
Ladies and Gentlemen, *This* is the New and Improved "American Idol"
Well, word is spreading like wildfire that FOX is finally considering some major changes to the program. I suppose it had to happen sooner or later. And naturally, lots of people have their opinions on what should happen as far as these changes go -- everything from eliminating one more judges to toying around with the audition shows.
So, I thought I'd go ahead and weigh in with three thoughts on certain changes...
1. Don't Eliminate the Audition Shows
A lot of people are calling for a complete elimination of the program's audition shows. These people would have them just not shown at all, or show the auditions only in flashbacks. I say, don't do it. The auditions have been one of the most popular parts of the program, and many people watch only those. Instead, I say trim it down. Sure, the auditions can be fun, but do we really need week after week of them? I say two hours of them and we move on to Hollywood.
2. Experiment with the Program in More Ways
This season added the twist that contestants are now allowed to play instruments. Cool idea, but how much have we heard about it recently? Almost nothing at all. It's like we've pretty much completely forgotten about it. In any case, this is exactly the type of innovation that could keep the show fresh. I say they should look for more ways to keep the programming interesting by changing it in subtle ways, but not eliminating those things that are working well that make it great.
3. Eliminate Pure "You Vote, You Decide"
You Vote, You Decide has been part of the program since its inception. After a certain point, viewers can begin calling or text-messaging in votes and whichever contestant gets the least is eliminated off the show. No ifs, ands or buts. It's something that defines the program. But is it really what's best for it? People have been talking about the possibility of axing it for years in favor of some combination of judging/audience tally results, like on Dancing with the Stars. The people who actually do the voting only make up a fraction of the people watching and so, despite the host Ryan's constant statements that if you don't vote, you can't complain, the people who are staying may not really be those who people want to see on the program.
Posted by agent_0042, 04/29/2008 4:15pm 9 Comments
Who Takes You Swimming With Dolphins?
Of course, there's also a number of other things pulling for my time. I continue to edit my other show guides, of which Charlie and Lola is currently still airing, and Johnny and the Sprites just recently ended its run of new episodes. New episodes of My Friends Tigger & Pooh also continue to air sporadically. I'm also currently contributing to a number of other guides, most particularly What's My Line?, Star Trek: Voyager, The Red Green Show and Care Bears: Adventures in Care-a-Lot (for which I am a Trusted User.) Additionally, I've been adding some bits and pieces of additional info for Franklin and Dragon Tales, as time permits. Finally, The Mole is returning soon -- I'm really looking forward to that! While I'm here -- I may as well mention two recent resignations -- My Friend Rabbit and Duel. My Friend Rabbit is a great show, but it seems like few people are watching, and I'd just prefer to watch than have to edit. As for Duel -- I no longer like the show much in its current format and have stopped watching.
One last thing -- apparently either this week or next week is that ridiculous "TV Turn Off Week" thing. For more thoughts on this bit of insipid nonsense, check back on my past blogs from around this time, last year, in which I did a "TV Turn-On Week," celebrating the idea of TV being a positive influence.
Posted by agent_0042, 04/24/2008 3:30pm 4 Comments
"Basch Lives! Don't Believe Ondore's Lies!"

And don't believe either the lies of Dish Network, a company I'm increasingly glad I switched away from for the better service and quality of DirecTV. I picked up a copy of USA Today (April 16 issue), and saw the above item, which is an excerpt of a larger advertisement. "Exclusive Feature?" Pleassssse. I get both the thirty-second commercial skip (which can be used multiple times) and the instant replay on my DVR from DirecTV. For Dish Network to say that this is an "Exclusive Feature" would be like, oh, I don't know... them saying that they had the "Exclusive Rights" to air Spike TV programming or something. Yeah --- they have the exclusive rights when it comes to providing it on their own equipment!
Ever since I got DirecTV, I've been vastly satisfied with their service compared with Dish Network. For one thing, I'm finally getting all the programming I want. None of this Noggin only 12 hours a day stuff, when Noggin has been airing 24 hours a day since New Year's Eve 2007. And I'm getting Sprout to, a network Dish Network never carried due to some nonsense excuse about people already being able to get PBS content through their local stations (Sprout carries any of a number of programs that either are no longer airing on most local PBS affiliates, or never did air on any PBS station, including Panwapa, Kipper and Sagwa the Chinese Siamese Cat.) I'm also getting FOX Reality. All right, so this is one I actually could have gotten from Dish Network, but it would have required paying for a higher-level package, and it wasn't enough on its own to make me interesting in that package at the time I had Dish.
DirecTV's customer service is great. I've rarely had any problems since signing up with them, but those couple of times that I have, I've been able to quickly get support, either by phone or online. DirecTV loses signal less often than Dish Network (I read that's because their satellite is higher in the sky than Dish's.) Finally, the basics of their technology just seem better. For example, when accessing a menu while using Dish's equipment, I was always taken away to a separate screen and couldn't continue watching programming while doing so, except when bringing up the program guide. DirecTV not only allows me to continue watching while using any menu function, it lets me manipulate the program using the DVR features as well when the menu's up.
So Dish Network can keep their DVR service. Their features aren't exclusive, and they're not better than DirecTV. I'm also not paying that much more than I was before, in fact, I think I may be paying less for the time being, since my signup discounts are still in effect. And for those still wish Dish Network -- you need to know that DirecTV would be happy to have your business, and you may just end up getting a better deal. I was able to sign up and get all the basic equipment for free, as well as various other goodies. (Oh, and in case, anyone's wondering, yes, Dish Network did try to bait me back. But their offers were a joke. Six free months of BabyFirst TV or HBO/Showtime programming? What do I care?)
Posted by agent_0042, 04/16/2008 7:11pm 5 Comments
Fellow Editors! Need Help? Looking to Vent? Try the Editor's Lounge

So you're a new Editor here at TV.com and you're a bit confused as to how to really get things started, or how to format certain things in your guide. Or maybe you've been around for a while, but you're finding yourself having a problem with somebody who just doesn't seem to go away and just keeps submitting stuff like "omg!!! i love this episode" or "this is the fifth appearance (sixth appearance, 42.42nd appearance, etc.) of character X" and you don't know what to do. Well, before taking drastic action, you might find it worth your time to stop on down at the Editor's Lounge (or Editors' Lounge, as some of us like to call it.)
The Editor's Lounge is only open to those that they edit either show or person guides (or both) here at TV.com and is a great place to talk directly with other Editors about those issues related to editing that are on your mind. Don't feel like talking? That's okay, too! You'll still find a lot of great information, including the site's Editor Guidelines, a place to post duplicate episodes or seasons for deletion, various policies and helpful discussions, and even a link to a thread where you can post an alert if you have to leave the site for a period of time and don't want your guides to be taken away.
And remember, the Editors' Lounge isn't simply a place to get help. You'll find topics where you can discuss your feelings on submissions in general, talk about the ways in which you go about managing your guides, and even a thread (rather old, but hey, if somebody wants to dig it up) about any wacky dreams you may have had related to editing.
P.S.: For those of you that aren't Editors -- access is easy. All you need to do is contribute enough to a guide on the site to become an Editor - 80 points for a show or 40 points for a person, or 80/40 more than the current Editor if there is one. As of this post, there is currently a bug on the site that is interfering with the awarding of Editorships, but it should be fixed soon. Just remember that editing is a commitment -- if you're not ready for it, then it might be kinder to retire. And if you're not a Editor, don't forget that you can still Ask the Editors. I haven't really spent too much time on this board (there's only so many boards I can be on), but it's definitely a great resource.
Oh, on a sidenote, for my regular readers -- turns out I was right about the new Wonder Pets special "Save the Beetles!" -- in that the merchandise is now available. I saw an advertisement during Nick Jr.'s loathsome credits-crunching on The Backyardigans promoting apparel and posters. I must admit, I'm seriously tempted by the posters. And one other bit of news, I read that two of the stars of the Broadway show "Beatlemania!" were tapped to provide voices for the special. Psychedelic!
Posted by agent_0042, 04/12/2008 4:50pm 7 Comments
My Recent Reviews
|
Care Bears: Adventures in Care-A-Lot Down to Earth Avg Score: 10.00 Total Ratings: 2 Total Reviews: 1 |
"Adventures in Care-a-Lot" is the newest revival of the popular "Care Bears" franchise that originated from the 1980s. On the whole, it's been a fun, though not perfect revival. If there's any one main complaint, it's been that some of the stories have been a bit shallow, with the characters engaging in silly behavior and a noticeable lack of truly interesting plot. So it's nice to see the program producing some material of substance, as seen in this special direct-to-DVD episode titled "Down to Earth."
In this episode, the Care Bears create a new device called the "Care Bear Transporter," which generally goes by "CBT" for short. It was actually first seen in "Emma's Dilemma," (which was also pretty good) but let's overlook that since it seems pretty obvious that they released content out of production order. In any case, Funshine Bear comes up with the idea for the device when the Rainbow Rescue Beam and Care Meter are temporarily on the fritz. He suggests combining the two, creating a device that allows the Bears to detect someone that it's need directly of caring help and then transport directly to them.
A portion of the rest of the episode focused on a subplot involving some of the Care Bears trying to chase down the CBT machine after it malfunctions and goes on a rampage. I'm not going to really cover this because most of it is just physical humor, but it did make for an amusing break at times.
The main action, however, focuses on what happens when Funshine becomes the first of the Care Bears to test out the CBT device. He transports to Earth where a little boy named Jake is feeling out of sorts because he and his family moved to a new home and he feels alone and friendless. Funshine's job is to help him to see that even though he's somewhere new, he can still find the fun. Funshine starts by showing Jake that his imagination can be a powerful tool in finding fun. Together the two create play swords out of cardboard boxes and have all sorts of fun playing various games. Later, though, when Jake stumbles upon an old album, Funshine helps him to see that even though he misses his old friends, he has the opportunity to make new ones in this new neighborhood.
One of my favorite sequences involves a part in which Jake's Mom sees Jake with Funshine. Funshine previously mentioned to Jake that it's best to not let adults see Care Bears because they don't always understand. In a very clever tactic, Funshine goes completely still, leaving Jake's Mom to believe that he's simply a plush toy left by the old owners of the house. She says that they should probably throw him in the wash. Jake is horrified at the idea, but when Funshine gets the chance, he tells Jake not to worry. Going in the laundry would be dangerous for a human kid, but for a Care Bear it's like having a good bath. That evening, while Jake is eating dinner, he sneaks peeks back at the washer, where Funshine is scene doing various amusing takes, such as scrubbing while wearing a shower cap and donning a mask and snorkel. It's truly a hoot and great animation to watch.
What's also great to watch is what happens after dinner when Jake goes back outside to play. He meets a group of three kids who are out playing. When they accidentally kick their ball in his direction, not seeing him, he returns it to them. The kids seem to hope that he'll join in their game -- it's obvious that they really want him to come over and play, but he just walks away. Funshine realizes that Jake's going to need some help and so he fashions a bright, bouncy yellow ball using his belly-badge and covertly aims it in the direction of the kids. Funshine's idea works -- the kids think it was Jake who tossed the ball, and pretty soon all of them are playing and having a fun time. A bit later, at an opportune moment, Funshine retrieves the belly-badge ball and the kids all get the opportunity to sit down and talk. They had seen Jake move into the neighborhood and were wondering when he was going to say "hi." He admits he was a bit shy and they reveal that Nicole was like that when she first arrived in the neighborhood too, but now they're all friends. As they continue to chat, Jake notices glowing insects flying around them. Jake wonders just what they are or if they might even be harmful -- there were no fireflies at his old house and he hasn't heard of them. They tell him not to worry and that they're fun to catch. They all have fun catching fireflies in a jar until Jake's parents call for him to come inside. Everyone expresses pleasure at the idea of playing again tomorrow and Jake's friends head off for home. As Jake starts to head inside, Funshine notes that he managed to make some new friends. The Care Bears finally managed to get the CBT fixed, so Funshine has to go. Jake says that he'd like to visit him in Care-a-Lot someday and gives him the fireflies he and his new friends caught as a gift. Watching from above, the Care Bears aren't sure just what Jake is giving Funshine and end up deciding that it's a jar of peanut butter. When Funshine returns, he finds Oopsy running up with a loaf of bread so that they can all have sandwiches. Grumpy expresses disbelief at the actual contents of the jar -- "He gave you *bugs*?" Funshine, however, says that Jake gave him more than that, and I think we all know what he means. He releases the fireflies, which put on quite a show.
This episode really worked well for me. It focused on a somewhat serious subject -- a child who moved to new home and felt alone and friendless, but it also added in elements of humor and joy in a fun and believable way. This is what I like to see from the show and what I've felt it's sometimes been lacking. Silliness can be good, but I look forward to seeing more like this from this program. I wouldn't mind seeing the Jake character again either -- perhaps someday they'll take him up on that offer to pay a visit to Care-a-Lot.
|
Hell's Kitchen Avg Score: 8.61 Total Ratings: 1888 Total Reviews: 170 |
The contestants compete each week in various challenges to prove their worth. Early on, they're split into the Blue and Red Teams (boys vs. girls), but as the numbers get worn down, they eventually "merge" (sort of like "Survivor.") The pressure is intense and demanding, while the talent required is incredible. If you either don't handle pressure well or simply aren't very good at cooking, then this is not the program for you to be on.
Gordon Ramsay is the highlight of the show. He's a real firebrand -- and, what's more, he has passion, skill and flair. He uses his sharp wit to whip the contestants into shape and call them out whenever they're performing to less than their best. He curses, he yells, he insults -- but if you can't take that heat, you shouldn't be on "Hell's Kitchen." I've read his autobiographical book, "Roasting in Hell's Kitchen." He's been through a lot and he's got what it takes. And if the contestants are willing to watch and learn, they too can have what it takes to survive in the demanding reality of running a major restaurant, or even a chain of them.
I'll be tuning in each week, hungry for more of this fantastic reality series.
|
Duel Avg Score: 8.13 Total Ratings: 38 Total Reviews: 3 |
It seemed like a solid and fun format to me, but it also seemed like audiences didn't agree. The ratings for the program, for the most part, were abysmal. It only averaged around 6-7 million viewers per airing and weak overall ratings. Therefore, I was very surprised, but pleased when I heard the program would be coming back...
Unfortunately, I really don't like the new changes that have been made to the show. It's now airing in a weekly format and the amount that contestants can win has been dramatically lowered. They now play individual duels for fairly low amounts of money and if they choose to continue, they risk what they've already won. If they lose even once, everything is gone. Furthermore, if they make it all the way, the top prize that they can win is only $500,000. That's hardly high stakes compared to what some game shows that don't even require much knowledge or strategy have been offering these days. When you can watch a contestant win $1,000,000 with a random spin of the wheel on Price is Right, where's the excitement in $500,000? To top it off, the quality of the contestants has been spotty. Some of them have plunked down chips on obviously wrong answers, and most of them are on the show for such a short length of time that's it's hard to really care about what happens to them.
So it's goodbye for me to another game show that seemed like it had the potential for greatness. I'm hungry for great game shows, but they seem to be few and far between these days.
|
Strawberry Shortcake Avg Score: 7.79 Total Ratings: 98 Total Reviews: 6 Users who agree: 2 |
I first found out about the new "Strawberry Shortcake," (I won't be focusing on the old one here, as I haven't seen much of it.) oh, maybe sometime around the middle of the "first season" of the new version series, as such. I was immediately attracted by the colorful and eye-catching quality of the animation, cute characters, and the generally fun stories and songs. I quickly established some favorite characters, including Strawberry Shortcake's baby (little?) sister, Apple Dumplin', her two pets Custard and Pupcake, as well as the horse Honey Pie Pony. I generally tried to watch all the new videos/DVDs and listen to the music albums as they became available.
But... something is happening to the series. It's always seemed a bit like this, but lately it's more so. The show no longer seems to be sure what it wants to be. First, the Purple Pieman shows up. I can live with this -- I'm not totally against villains, and his sidekick sister also seems to add some comic relief. But now Apple Dumplin' seems to be all but gone (where the heck is she? -- she's your *sister*, Strawberry!), and the horses and pets really aren't being given much at all to do. They've also completely revamped the look of the characters. I actually like some of them, but others I would definitely prefer the younger, cuter versions.
Of course, change isn't always bad. Sometimes, change can lead to big improvements. I have enjoyed some of the chapter books, and the "World of Friends" special wasn't awful. The merchandise -- it's scattershot, though a lot of it is good. But it seems to me like they're juggling stuff around in an attempt to keep the series fresh when they already had a cast of great characters. I say return the series to its roots and spin-off Apple Dumplin' into her own show as well. I'd pay to watch the Apple Dumplin' and Friends hour.
Note: The 8.0 rating is a weighted average for the series as a whole. I'd probably rate the stuff they're currently putting out closer to a 6.5-7.0, dipping down to a 5.0 at its very worst.
|
Danny Elfman Avg Score: 9.85 Total Ratings: 22 Total Reviews: 5 |
I know Elfman best for four of his scores -- "Men in Black," Charlotte's Web," the music for the "Spiderman" films and "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory."
"Men in Black" is a film that's dear to me and the score does a lot to enhance it. It gets you from the beginning to end, drawing you into the intrigue of the film, as well as its more tender moments, and never lets go. I love the opening theme in particular.
"Charlotte's Web" (the live-action version) is a probably underrated film once again featuring a great soundtrack. As you certainly know if you've seen it, or read the books, there was a series of words that was used to describe to describe the pig character - "Radiant," "Humble," "Terrific," "Some Pig." Imagine trying to convey the essence of these in two-three minute music pieces -- yet this was exactly what Elfman did with his score. He also did a great job with the "Main Theme," as well as the vocal piece "Ordinary Miracle."
I don't normally watch "superhero" films, but I've made an exception for the "Spiderman" series. These films have a lot of action, and the soundtracks have a bit more rock than I would prefer, but Elfman did an excellent job on the whole.
Finally, there's "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory." This film was a real head-trip, and Elfman's music was just the style for it. By far the best track was "Veruca Salt." Very psychedelic, fun to listen too --- "Aw aw, aw aw aw! Veruca Salt, the little brute / Has just gone down the garbage chute / And she will meet as she descends / A rather different set of friends!" And what's more is that these words are Roald Dahl's work, yet Elfman managed to set just the right music to them.
Generally, if it's music, and it's Elfman, it's worth your time. Anything his work is featured in is generally enhanced by his musical genius.
Last online Jul 18, 2008 9:23 pm PT
Member since Apr 25, 2005
Profile views: 15021 (+ 36 new)
| Send Message | |
| Report Abuse | |
Stats
Rank: Species #8472
Forum Posts: 7,460
|
Submissions Accepted: 15,767 Pending: 6 Denied: 95 Total: 15,868 |
Reviews Shows: 15 Episodes: 35 People: 2 Total: 52 |
Animation 37: 27.8%
Reality 13: 9.8%
Drama 13: 9.8%
Other 27: 20.3%
About Me
Friends
Tracked Blogs
|
JSidekick3 So I watched it... Friday, July 18, 2008 | 1 comment |
|
|
mstheresa1969 The new Batman movie Friday, July 18, 2008 | 3 comments |
|
|
tvaddict_10 I Broke TV.com Friday, July 18, 2008 | 5 comments |
|
|
danbambridge Mixed Emotions Friday, July 18, 2008 | 26 comments |
|
|
jekyll Are You Being Served? Thursday, July 17, 2008 | 9 comments |
|
|
markdoublea84 My Rugrats Top 30 Wednesday, July 16, 2008 | 0 comments |
|
|
j19000 So, who's happy/unhappy? Wednesday, July 16, 2008 | 5 comments |
|
|
sssquarepants Please people...LET YOUR VOICES BE HEARD! Tuesday, July 15, 2008 | 19 comments |
|
|
gabfan31 Warlords Anonymous (A new Xena short story) Monday, July 14, 2008 | 4 comments |
|
|
Angus_Mac Ant Rant, Anime junkie ed update, Weird Japanese airtimes, and thanks to the UK! Saturday, July 12, 2008 | 20 comments |
|
Friends' Videos
This is a short film that I made for university. It had to be 60 seconds long (actual footage - not credits - but mine ended up being 66 seconds), and it had to follow the theme Recreate the moment after a crime. Hope you enjoy it! Please comment.
The Swedish Chef serves up one hell of a chicken..... in a basket!
Colossus, the most 'upside-downy' rollercoaster in the world, with 10 complete inversions. Thorpe Park, Surrey, UK.
Print
Email
Comment
Tag
Digg this






























