Hollywood versus Hollywood - why both sides are wrong in the WGA strike!
All too often lately I see people voicing uninformed support for the WGA strike that is ongoing, and it just drives me crazy. All I hear is "Writers deserve to be paid more!" or "The producers/directors/random villianous entity #7,283 is evil!" yet nary there be an actual argument to support the strike in sight despite numerous statements on why to oppose it.So now it is time to lay out some good old fashioned education, the kind that they've banned in schools.
So here's the deal people. The WGA is not your cuddly little New England Mafia founded labor union, nor your soviet bloc idolizing socialist let's-all-be-equal-even-though-we're-not paradise seeking union. Most unions have a membership that has roughly thet same income level. You don't see a truck driver barely making ends meet alongside a truck driver living in a mansion inside of a bigger mansionand eating cavier off as many dead hookers are they want. The WGA is a rare beast among union organizations, one that has an extreme variance in the finances of its membership. Now you may be asking yourself at this point "So what?". Well union lovers, welcome to hypocrisy. The point of a union (or at least what is supposed to be the point of a union) is to protect the poor workers against the big rich white guys who eat babies... yet... the WGA leadership and elite members ARE the big rich white guys who eat babies. We're talking some of the biggest names in show business are WGA members. Something's wrong with this picture already, and I haven't even gotten to the strike.
So keep all this in mind as we continue on this little journey of discovery.
The main point of contention on the strike is residuals on digital media. Now, allow me to do a quick explaination of this. Most shows, as in out of every show that has ever aired... well, they ain't going to be making a damn penny out of these residuals. And then just as many shows are going to be making so little it might as well not even be the same damn penny. Damn pennies. The people who stand to make money out of this are those who *ALREADY HAVE SUCCESSFUL OUTLETS*. As in *ARE ALREADY RICH AS HELL*. This isn't a move to protect the average WGA writer, it is a move to further pad the pockets of the WGA elite. If they really wanted to help the average writer they'd be asking for something much more simple - higher initial salary. In other words, money on the front end. Not only would it equal more money for most writers outright, it would safeguard them in case the show or movie was not a success. Add into this, a salary increase is then applicable to below the line worker's contracts(see below) while residuals are not, so further helps the common man the unions love to claim they represent.
The general behavior of the WGA has also been simply vindictive. They are demanding people who serve in dual roles not fullfill their non writing duties, despite being contractually bound to, making ridiculous demands of members(they literally said don't bring high end food to the strike, what the hell), and to top it all off choose the single most destructive time possible to strike. Many WGA members have expressed confusion on why the strike was not held sooner, and the answer is simple. The WGA elite wanted to do as much damage as humanly possible to flex their muscles. They could have easily striked in Spring or Summer and caused far fewer jobs to be lost and hurt fledgling television series virtually not at all, while acheiving their goals, but specifically waited for the height of the fall season to make their move. That is just playing dirty no matter how you cut it.
Now let's take a moment and look at the strike repurcussions. Because contrary to popular belief, when you do something, something else usually happens as a result, and then something else happens as a result of that, and so forth. In the case of this strike... well, let's see.
1) Below the line workers are laid off. It is just simple economics, can't blame the studios for this at all. (Below the line workers are the people who no one really cares about and whose name you will never bother to remember unless they are your uncle. Cameramen, grips, assistants,caterers, those guys who hold up cue cards, make-up artists, and Pauly Shore.) We're talking dozens, sometimes HUNDREDS(yes, HUNDREDS) of people who work on TV shows and movie sets. Just out of work. Bam. Oh, but hang around because you never know when the strike could end, so have fun finding a temp job that will take that into account assuming you are even trained for anything else. And remember, Wal-mart can only hire so many greeters. And to top it all off, all those fancy residuals don't help these guys at all - the only residuals they ever see are sent to union funds which are subsequently plundered by organized crime(and Pauly Shore, he's got sticky fingers).
2) Writers with active fledgling projects... well, suddenly they ain't in such a great position to keep their fledgling shows afloat. Any show currently struggling will find itself without a chance to come back, seasons are cut short harming return viewership, and suddenly... bam. The people the strike are supposed to be helping are out of a job.
3) People who serve dual roles on productions, such as Writer/Producer or Writer/Director or even Writer/guy who holds cue cards, are pressured by the WGA into not fullfilling their non writing duties... placing them squarely in breach of contract city.
4) And other stuff.I'm getting bored of writing this so I'm coping out and just saying other stuff. Other stuff is bad.
BUT BUT BUT.. YOU SAID BOTH SIDES ARE WRONG! WHY ARE YOU JUST TRASHING THE WGA AND LEAVING US?! Calm down bucko, we're getting there, I wouldn't leave without trashing the other side too. Fortunately this is a bit easier to explain, so we'll do another fun numbered quick list.
LIST OF WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE PRODUCER TYPE PEOPLES AND THE NETWORKS AND JUNK... GO!
1) They are obviously full of crap when they state certain things are promotional use only. It is a strange thing to be lying about, as it only helps the WGA in their PR war.
2) They are idiots. Now, to be fair some are only moderately idiotic, but a lot are just incredibly, monstrously idiotic. Show cancellations that are just bizarre(Veronica Mars), completely unfair treatment of many shows(Drive, Jericho pre-resurrection), and just all around retarded moves on programming in general.
3) They don't have the best grasp on economic returns on proper investments, and prefer to put out reality and game shows galore simply because of cheap production cost resulting in higher profits for lower ratings... while refusing to cultivate new shows and attempting to try anything remotely risky. They want their new incarnations of Friends or Raymond to be hits from Day 1, and if they don't topple American Idol in their 8:30 Wednesday death slot right out of the gate then they couldn't care less about them. Combine this with #2 and the entire culture of American entertainment continues its ever steepening decline.
4) I have seen one, ONE, statement by a producer about the strike that was well thought out and accurate, and it was buried in the comments section of an L.A. Times blog. What the hell? Maybe they've started to outsource their PR to India now, I mean if it works for tech support why not.
5) Anyway, what it really boils down to is this, their idiocy aside... The major networks, their studios, and their pet producers(not so much the more independent ones) have some of the most atrocious business practices possible. It would take hours to write up a full list of their outright borderline crimes. Forget the oil companies, these guys are the communications giants(Comcast and AT+T) are the real crooks.
So, in short... Both sides suck, and people need to get over their mindless support of the WGA simply because they have the better PR machine going.Don't forget that we, the viewer, are thelosers here. Oh. Uh, and I guess those guys who lost their jobs for no gain lose too, but it's hard to think about them when I only have a few more episodes of CSI New York to watch before I start going into Gary Sinise withdrawal. (He's like ecstasy and chocolate chip pop-tarts rolled into one.)
There's a lot more to be said, and a lot more I want to say, but no one is going to read this anyway so who cares, back to playing Super Mario Galaxy.
Posted by dmfaust, 11/22/2007 9:13pm 0 Comments
The plague of the gaming industry spreads unabated, and its name is EA
EA continues their attempt of monopolization of the gaming industry - slowly turning every good developer into a shadow of their former itself. Bioware is the latest victim, with Flagship(formerly Blizzard North) just before them. And with Flagship's Hellgate a scant 2 weeks away, it will bea serious show of how much EA can screw someone over as these former Diablo 2 developers are forced to rush out a title when their history is that of waiting until it is well and truly finished.
Another recent story that should be mentioned as a prime example of their incompetence is the EA acquisition of Mythic. Mythic are best known for currently working on the Warhammer MMORPG. They have a solid background in the genre having created the excellent and oft overlookedDark Age of Camelot(which to this day remains the best PvP experience there is), and while certainly not a flawless development house are far above most. Upon the EA take over of Mythic, with Warhammer looming on the horizon and receiving plenty of press and hype, they did one of the most bizarre things ever... EA pulled Mythic employees off of Warhammer to work on an Ultima Online expansion. Ultima Online. UO. As in a game that is over 10 years old and has virtually no player base left. And now we recently have news that the Warhammer beta is going on a 2 month or longer hiatus, which is far from a good sign. So things are looking just peachy over at Mythic after EA showed up at their doorstep with the deal from the devil.
When will the nightmare end? It is more than past time to stand up against EA - stop buying their first party products altogether and avoid any company that is under the EA banner -unless it is one that needs to be supported to show EA who the true game companies are such as Bioware. Gamers must diluge EA with letters of complaint and statements of distaste for their business practices, not just e-mail but real postal mail as well.
Let us all take a moment to pray for Bioware Austin, who knows what will happen to the fledgling offspring and its mysterious projects now. Dead before it ever gets a chance to live? Quite possible with EA pulling the strings(both purse and puppet). We shall see soon enough I expect.
My fondish wish is that EA tries to throw its weight into the hardware arena. That competition and initial lack of profit can destroy even the best of companies, and I can't imagine EA pulling it out like Microsoft or Sony(PS1 and PS2 anyway, PS3 seems like something EA would do).
NEXT TIME! Whyblu-ray sucks! And find out who ate my goddamn leftovers ~we have a good old fashioned mystery on our hands.I'm hungry.
Posted by dmfaust, 10/17/2007 4:13pm 0 Comments
My Recent Reviews
|
Life Avg Score: 9.09 Total Ratings: 1964 Total Reviews: 40 Users who agree: 1 |
The story so far has been pulled off excellently, with twists and revelations that keep you waiting on edge for the next piece to fall into place. Threaded through this are individual cases that Crews and his partner, a female detective who is recently recovering from severe drug abuse, solve in typical TV cop show fashion. Unfortunately these episodic cases are solid but often feel as if they take away from time that could be better spent on the primary story arc, though they do help to develop the relationships between Crews, his new and old partners, as well as some of the people who want him off the force.
Oh, and I shouldn't forget to mention that after so many years of imprisonment... Well, ol' Charlie has lost his mind a little. Embracing zen philosphy while in prison to cope with his situation, he is often prone to talking to himself or spouting nonsensical or mysterious statements in keeping with the teachings he's embraced. This leads to one of the highest points of entertainment in the series, as his take on situations leads to frustration for everyone around him but hilarious situations for the viewer. Add in his best friend and money handler Ted, a former white collar criminal Crews met in prison, and you have a serious drama with more mirth than most comedies.
Life is one of those series that just came out of nowhere - it received little hype and almost no marketing in comparison to many shows of the new season, yet it is easily in the top tier of scripted television on the air at the moment. Strongly recommended for fans of crime shows, conspiracy dramas, straight faced comedy, or just plain anyone who enjoys quality entertainment.
(Important to note, the pilot episode, as with many, was not quite up to the par the rest of the series after it so far has set. So don't watch the first episode and judge it by it, keep going!)
|
K-Ville Avg Score: 8.57 Total Ratings: 658 Total Reviews: 51 |
The supporting cast is a bit of a mixed bag unfortunately, primarily the Captain whose name I am too lazy to look up at the moment. His accent is atrocious, and comes across in some middle ground that it is neither television cliche aethetic nor does it feel quite legitimate. Blake Shields(formerly of the late lamented Showtime series Sleeper Cell) is at the other end of the spectrum however, and plays the younger-but-not-quite-rookie cop role to a T, but is underused except for to summarize information for the leads(and the viewers.) Everyone else so far is rather unimpressionable, and some of the guest spots have been below par.
Production wise the approach is like previous series to attempt the grittier atmosphere such as the Shield, with shakey, and oft times grainy, camera work which works well for the series.
As mentioned in the summary, the storylines are ambitious to say the least. The very first episode starts off with a mercenary conspiracy, followed up by a massive prison break... conspiracy, and then again followed up by a (guess what) conspiracy between latin gang members and politicians. Obviously the intention to make New Orleans look vulnerable, yet the string of unprobable highly organized crimes takes away from the realistic feel that is otherwise present in the series. Again to use the Shield as a reference point, as it is a close comparison, you see none of the day to day crimes or normal gang warfare backing up larger storylines, simply a more aggressive storyline after another shoved into an hour of television.
Overall, the series is quite enjoyable and I'd be very surprised if it doesn't make it. It needs to fix up a few minor issues and tone down the storylines before it burns out too fast, but it is the makings of a quality cop drama in a unique setting.
|
Moonlight Avg Score: 8.96 Total Ratings: 3873 Total Reviews: 323 |
Not to lay the fault for the show's present shortcomings at the feet of the actors alone, there are many questionable decisions made in production that irked me and kept me from liking the show as I wanted to. Foremost among them is the overly cliche Vampirisms, such as cheap contacts and growls that make you want to laugh at something that is meant to be intimidating. The lack of decent overall production values(and acting for that matter) is even more off putting considering that this is a CBS show and not on a low budget cable network like Lifetime's Blood Ties.
If they manage to clean up the show a bit and smooth out the rough(cheesey) edges over the course of the next few episodes we might have another good supernatural series on the air, given the admittedly solid foundation it has being a major network show with not a bad story. But for the moment, being better than Blood Ties doesn't amount to enough to keep this on the air or hold the interest of any but the most die hard vampire crowd(who, ironically, were the focus of and skewered a bit in the first episode).
|
Cold Case Avg Score: 8.93 Total Ratings: 3164 Total Reviews: 144 |
I won't bother getting overly analytical since this is just a TV.com review, so here is a straight lineup of the good and the bad.
Good:
- Acting is subperb. While I'm not overly fond of the Rush character, every supporting actor is amazing in this series. Danny Pino in particular is the stand out. He has enough versatility and skill that it blew me away to find out he was Armadillo in the Shield(one of the most sadistic TV villians of recent memory), as I was mentally unable to reconcile Valens as Armadillo.
- The soundtrack is always top notch. And I'm not talking about the endless parade of #1 pop hits, though they often add a fun feel to getting into time of the crime, but the actual background soundtrack is superb.
- Many interesting looks at recent history, even if somewhat stilted towards the modern view of it.
- Stand out episodes. Now of course every series has them, but this deserves special mention. Some episodes, usually those dealing with primary character storylines or reoccuring events(The Woods in Season 2) are just exceptional to a degree it is hard to think of them as the same series as some of the rest of the batch.
Bad:
- Flat out unrealistic. You can't open case after case from up to 90 years ago and solve each and every last one.
- Extremely repetitive story flow with interviews. You can always tell the best episodes when they break the mold.
- Almost complete lack of forensics. Come on, if you are opening an older case the single best tool is modern science, but at the most you only hear side references to what off screen characters have done. Unless they feel like recreating bones you never even see the great but under used Frannie on screen.
- Overuse of racial or sexuality based crimes, particulary in the cases taking place int he 1920-1950s. I mean don't get me wrong, I am fully aware that a massive chunk of older unsolved homicide are very likely related to race or sexuality. But come on, you going to tell me not one of those cold jobs was a mafia hit? Not a single one was an old fashioned bank robbery gone wrong? I mean seriously, how the hell do you take a prohibition bootlegging story that was shaping up to be a great one and then 180 it into an interracial lesbian story out of nowhere? The communist episode is the only one I even remember that was pre 1950 that didn't fall back on racism, gay bashing, or racist gay bashing as the motive.
|
Masters of Horror Deer Woman Avg Score: 7.86 Total Ratings: 140 Total Reviews: 10 Users who agree: 2 |
Excellent writing, directing, and acting all around, Benben deserves a lot of credit for his performance here and hopefully it will lead to something outside a Landis flick sometime soon.
Last online Jul 18, 2008 9:26 pm PT
Member since Dec 6, 2006
Profile views: 142 (+ 1 new)
| Send Message | |
| Report Abuse | |
Stats
Rank: Small Wonder
Forum Posts: 65
|
Submissions Accepted: 0 Pending: 0 Denied: 1 Total: 1 |
Reviews Shows: 7 Episodes: 1 People: 0 Total: 8 |
Action/Adventure 20: 27.8%
Science-Fiction 11: 15.3%
Comedy 4: 5.6%
Other 2: 2.8%
About Me
Print
Email
Comment
Tag
Digg this







