My So-Called Life...nothig to do with the TV show.
Ok, this is for the people playing SVU Hangman. My feelings will be really hurt if I don't at least get a couple of comments.
I mentioned on the hangman board that today was more interesting than most. Now you will see just how dull my life is.
A few years ago, I discovered that I was allergic to sweet potatoes. They made me break out in itchy red hives all over my arms, thighs, chest belly, and back. Not a big deal. For some strange reason, yams don't cause me any problems, and they taste about the same, so I just eat them when I have a hankering for sweet potatoes.
Then I found a Betty Crocker Sweet Potato Casserole mix on sale this past Christmas and bought three of them. We had one for the family dinner, and it was good.
And it gave me hives.
So, we had two boxes of sweet potato casserole mix sitting in the pantry, and my mother has been driving me freaking nuts for the past six months to use them up. I swear three weekends a month she will nag me about making one of the mixes. The problem is, besides me, she is the only one in the house who eats sweet potatoes, and I can't anymore, so it has to wait for a big family holiday when we have company to help eat the casserole. We didn't throw a New Years party and every one else was off doing their own things at Easter, so there hasn't been an opportunity to make them since Christmas. Then I noticed that they have a sweet potato pie recipe on the box, so she demanded that I make sweet potato pie for the Fourth of July.
So, I had the ingredients all mixed up and Mom says, "You're not going to bake them now, are you?"
"That's what I had planned."
"It's too hot. I don't want you heating up my kitchen on such a hot day. Wait until it cools off tonight to bake them."
I did as ordered because sometimes it just doesn't pay to fight the insanity. I actually waited until the next day to bake the pies because I was too tired to stay up waiting for it to cool off so I could bake them that night.
So, we had two sweet potato pies and no one but mom and me to eat them. She starts nagging me about helping her eat them up, and I have to remind her that I am allergic, I break out in hives, I don't want to risk the reaction getting worse and someday maybe making my windpipe swell shut.
She keeps nagging,
"Fine, I'll eat a slice." I take a narrow slice about 1/2 inch wide at the crust edge and narrowing to a razor sharp point. I eat it, enjoy it, knowing I'll regret it.
Hours later, no rash. Feeling emboldened, I take another tiny slice. Mmmmm. Sooooo good. By 1:00 a.m., still no rash, so I have another piece as a bedtime snack. Altogether, they didn't amount to a whole slice. I did the same thing on Sunday with no ill effects.
Today I woke up later than usual, too late for breakfast but too early for lunch. The pie was there. I took a teeny, tiny wedge of it.
On an empty stomach.
Half an hour later, I had a lobster-red rash and hives all over my thighs, belly, chest, back, and arms. I took a Benadryl and two Vitamin C tablets (a natural antihistamine) and it was mostly gone by six.
At least now my mom believes me when I tell her I am allergic to sweet potatoes.
And if anyone can explain why I am allergic to sweet potatoes and not yams, I would love to know just because I am a curious person.
And that is a day in my so-caled life.
Eleven Things You May (or May Not) Know about Telemarketers
Back in January, I took a part time job as a telephone customer service representative for a major direct mail marketer and mail-order service that has been in business for over thirty years in the U.S., Canada, and Europe. I take incoming customer service calls - questions, complaints, order changes, and phone payments - so can proudly say that I am NOT a telemarketer. I just have to deal with the people they p!ss off. However, the people who work in the next room over are telemarketers, and I have learned some things from listening to them.
Most of this I am sure you already know or have suspected, but it can be encouraging to have your suspicions confirmed, and maybe I can provide a few tidbits that are news to you. Also, any laws cited apply to the United States only. I don't know what the deal is in other countries. You'll have to look that up for yourself.
So, here are eleven things you may or may not know about telemarketers.
1. Telemarketers are totally focused on SELLING you something in the shortest time possible. They get paid a low wage plus commissions. Commissions are their bread and butter, so if they don't sell, they can't pay the electric bill. That'swhytheytalksofastandmumbleabouttheforty-threeshipmentsofblemish-removingcreamyouhavetobuyatjusttwenyt-nineninetyfiveplusshippingandnhandlingpershipmenttoget your FREE HOME SPA TREATMENT VALUED AT ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS! It's underhanded, but it's legal, and be honest, if it meant the difference between having an asthma inhaler for your kid or telling him he had to ride the bench while his teammates played for the league championships because you couldn't risk him having an asthma attack, you'd sell your little heart out, wouldn't you?
2. Telemarketers are NOT evil. They ARE people just like you, stuck in a crappy job because they have bills to pay, kids to feed, pets to neuter, and a future in which they would some day like to retire. Odds are, they didn't CHOOSE to be a telemarketer, they got stuck with it and they are looking for a better job. Maybe the person who calls you is a twenty-year-old kid with lupus who's been sick since she was eight years old and is too medically fragile to do a more physically demanding job. She's smart enough to be a doctor, but her health doesn't allow her the stamina to complete her education and she doesn't want to live off disability (i.e. YOUR tax dollars) so she has taken a sit-down job where she can drink lots of water and go pee whenever she needs to because her meds affect her kidneys and she has to stay hydrated if she wants to stay out of the hospital. Maybe he's a forty-three-year-old construction worker who was permanently disabled when a steel beam fell on him and has spent the last year of his life learning to walk again and use the computer. Now the state considers him employable even though he needs crutches to walk and can't go back to his old job in construction, but without more education, he isn't qualified for any other job that uses his new computer skills.
3. Telemarketers DO NOT hang up on you the moment you answer the phone. If you think that's what happening, consider this: By hanging up, they are losing a potential sale. What really happens is this: A computer dials four numbers at the same time. The first person to answer goes through to the telemarketer, and the computer hangs up on the rest. The numbers that didn't get answers go back to the bottom of the list and get called again . . . and again . . . and again . . . until you answer.
4. Telemarketers actually ARE allowed to hang up on you, under the right circumstances. They can't just hang up because the person at the other end is being rude and cussing them out, although since you are all compassionate people who understand how desperate a person has to be to take a telemarketing job, I know that would never happen.
If, however, the person is non-responsive or asks them to hold, they are allowed to hang up after a specified period of time. The general time frame is about two minutes.
5. Under Federal Law, certain charities are allowed to call you. Even putting your name on the National Do Not Call List will not stop that.
6. Under Federal Law, companies that you have contacted and companies with which you have done business are allowed to call you. "Doing business" includes purchasing a product, sending in the warranty information, requesting free samples of something or trial issues of a magazine, requesting price quotes for insurance, sending in surveys or playing sweepstakes/lottery type games to win a free gift, or - this is the one that blows my mind - doing business with a sister company. To understand the sister company idea, take a look at this website http://www.trilegiant.com/ If you sign up and pay by credit card (the only way TO sign up) for ANY of the services over on the left side of the screen, ALL of those companies now have legal access to your information . . . even your credit card number. They can't do anything with that information (other than contact you) without your consent, but they have sneaky ways of getting your consent. Isn't it freaking ironic that they market Privacy Guard? ROFLMFAO!
7. Under Federal Law, even charities, companies with whom you have done or currently do business, and telemarketing companies not subject to the National Do Not Call Registry MUST HONOR their own Do Not Call lists. The trick is getting your name on them.
8. Under Federal Law, telemarketers are REQUIRED to tell you certain things:
- the name of the company and what they are selling.
- how much you will be paying for what you buy BEFORE you pay.
- whether the sale are final and/or non-refundable.
- if it is a prize promotion, the odds of winning, any expenses or conditions associated with claiming a prize, and that there is no purchase necessary to participate.
9. Under Federal Law, telemarketers are PROHIBITED from
10. Under Federal Law, if a telemarketer has your credit card information, and offers you something on a 'free trial basis' before charging your account, then the telemarketer must get your permission to use the account number, ask you to confirm the number by repeating the last four digits, and record the entire phone transaction.
- misrepresenting the cost or quality of goods or services.
- making false or misleading statements to persuade you to make a purchase.
- misleading you to purchase a credit card protection service that provides protection already provided under Federal Law.
11. If a telemarketer says they don't know how they got your information, that is probably true. Chances are, all they really know is that the computer dialed your number, you answered, and they have to try to sell you something now. Even if the information is in the computer, it is probably coded in a way that the poor schmuck on the phone hasn't been taught to read it because the powers that be in the company don't WANT the agents to be able to provide that information to every Tom, Dick, and Harry. If you knew how they got your information, you would take steps to prevent it in the future, and their list of potential customers would rapidly dwindle.
Now, I wouldn't be very nice if I gave you all of this juicy information and didn't tell you how to use it to your advantage, would I? Next time I get the chance to blog for a while, I'll give you some hints on how to deal with telemarketers without turning into a horrible, screaming, yelling person.
Posted by jo_idnew, 07/01/2008 11:49am 1 Comments
God's will, incompetence, or criminal neglect?
I have two cousins, ages 15 and 17, who travel to a Baptist church camp in the American South every year. As you can imagine, it involves hymn-singing, prayer, and Bible study, interspersed among typical camp activities such as fishing, swimming, hiking, canoeing, and campfire cookouts. They also go into neighboring communities and help build homes for the poor.
This year on the trip, the younger of my two cousins started throwing up. Before long, he was running a 104* fever and was violently ill. They tried al the typical treatments for nausea...gingerale and soda crackers, pedialyte, etc...but the projectile vomiting continued for hours. Then he started getting an "unusual" circular rash. (Can anyone see where this is heading?)
Anyway, the next day, after nearly twenty-four hours of puking and fever, the Good Christian People who run the camp finally decide to contact my aunt and uncle. Since they were unable to assess the situation from hundreds of miles away, they let my older cousin decide whether they needed to take his younger brother to the hospital. THANK GOD he was scared enough to say they should take him.
At the ER they gave him IV meds for the fever and nausea, and yes, they diagnosed him with Lyme Disease, a bacterial infection carried by certain ticks; but the most troubling thing, to me, at least, is that they had to give him six liters - over a gallon and a half - of fluids to get his electrolytes back to normal. That's over eight percent of his body weight in fluids, just to replace what he puked up in the twenty-four hours that the adults at the camp who were responsible for his safety spent diddling themselves.
When he heard the story, my dad observed that summer camps have to carry a certain amount of insurance in case kids get sick or are injured or killed there, but if the insurance never pays out, the premiums the camp has to pay stay low. Since it can take up to two weeks for the first symptoms of Lyme Disease to show up, there would be no way of saying for sure that picked up the tick that bit him at the camp. He could have just as easily gotten it at a party he attended at our place shortly before leaving for camp.
Now, I don't know about the state in which my cousins go to camp (perhaps, considering recent events, it exists in the State of Denial, Ignorance, or Indifference rather than one of the 50 U.S. states), but here where we live, a summer camp must have a medical person available at all times in case of emergency. That doesn't mean any schmuck with basic Red Cross First Aid, either, but real, honest to goodness medical training. The camp where I worked in my teens had a registered nurse on duty 24/7.
So, where was this person who should have been medically responsible for my cousin? Why was he or she not able to recognize the signs of serious dehydration (sunken eyes, dry lips, lethargy, confusion, and crepey skin) after hours of vomiting? Why was he or she not able to recognize the cla ssic bull's-eye rash of Lyme Disease? How could he or she not know the kid required emergency treatment? Why was this person not competent to make the decision to take my cousin to the hospital rather than asking my Aunt and Uncle to make the call from several hundred miles away and forcing them to rely on the judgment of a seventeen year old kid?
And my biggest question, if my cousin had died of dehydration while they were praying for his recovery rather than treating his illness, would the Good Christian People at that church camp call it God's Will, incompetence, or criminal negligence?
Open Season
Open Season
Rated PG for some rude humor, mild action and brief language.
Voices: Martin Lawrence as Boog, Ashton Kutcher as Elliot, Gary Sinise as Shaw, and Debra Messing as Beth.
Boog, a domesticated 900lb. Grizzly bear finds himself stranded in the woods 3 days before Open Season. Forced to rely on Elliot, a fast-talking mule deer, the two form an unlikely friendship and must quickly rally other forest animals if they are to form a rag-tag army against the hunters.
This movie certainly did not meet my expectations. There was more good than bad, but that doesn't necessarily make it a good family fun movie. At any rate, I'm glad I didn't pay to see it in the theater.
There was a nice little plot about friendship and forgiveness. Since he was responsible for most of Boog's troubles, Elliot took on the responsibility of getting him home. He was, as usual, inept, and when Boog realized his friend had simply taken him in a huge circle, the pair had a falling out. At about that time, Shaw, the hunter who was after Elliot, spotted them, and trying to get to them he stupidly drove across the beaver dam, breaking it and flooding the valley, washing all the animals downstream. Crossing over a ridge, Boog sees that his home is just at the bottom of the hill, and is eager to get back to his warm, dry garage. He tells the other animals that were swept downstream and out of the safety of the mountains when the dam broke that they are not his problem. Then he sees the long line of hunters leaving town and realizes his friends are in real danger. Since he can't get safely home until open season is over anyhow, he rallies the other animals to fight back against the hunters. The final battle between man and nature is spectacular and hilarious.
Coming from a family of hunters, I took exception to the portrayal of the villain as an unethical lunatic who was more of a beast than the animals he hunted. Yes, there are jerks like Shaw out there, but the movie didn't represent the hundreds of thousands of hunters who do follow the rules. Yes, I know in a movie where the animals are the heroes, the villain is most likely going to be a hunter, but is it really necessary to only show the freaks with no scruples who kill just because they can? There are those families, like mine when I was growing up, where venison, rabbit, trout, and other game animals make up a large portion of the protein in the diet. When my dad and all four brothers had a good year hunting, we ate as much venison as we did beef. All I'm asking for is equal representation.
By far, Open Season's worst failing is it's limited appeal. Most of the gags and jokes seem to have been written by thirteen-year-old boys. While a lot of animated films rely on juvenile humor, many of them also manage to amuse adults as well with subtle satire and sarcasm that doesn't always reach the younger audiences. Shrek and Ice Age are two notable examples. The vast majority of jokes in Open Season rely on gross body functions, stereotypes, and body parts. For example, much is made of Boog's reluctance to do what most bears do naturally in the woods; he requires a toilet and privacy. While it isn't terribly crude or inappropriate, it isn't really a 'family' film either as most of the humor will only appeal to adolescent boys.
The ending, when Beth arrives to take Boog home only to realize that he has finally found his real home in the wild is sweet, touching, and sends the appropriate mesaage that, no matter how long they live among humans, wild animals are still wild.
Rating: 2.5 out of 5
Recommendation: Rent it for your twelve-year-old son's birthday, make a mess of popcorn, and let him watch it with his friends while you find something better to do with your time. You can always spend quality time with him later playing Monopoly or something.
3 Best Moments: 1. Mr. Weenie says, "I feel so aliiiiive!" 2. Psychotic beaver with delusions of grandeur gets hold of a chainsaw. 3. Every time McSquizzy's army appears.
Yeah, I deleted some stuff
I deleted the posts about our bulk mail effort to Mariska's website. I didn't want it to become one of these e-mails that takes on a life of its own and is still circulating five years after the fact. Sadly, it didn't achieve the results we were hoping. Please, all of you, keep elliv in your thoughts and prayers as she is going through a rough time now.
My Recent Reviews
|
Law & Order: Special Victims Unit Avatar Avg Score: 5.99 Total Ratings: 222 Total Reviews: 23 Users who agree: 1 Users who disagree: 3 |
A tip comes in that Rachel was playing a VR game called Another Youniverse. Then we jump from suspect to suspect to suspect and from VR to real-world to identity theft and back time and again. Then the real perp turns out not to be who he says he is. He changed his name when he got out of prison after serving twenty years for kidnapping and murdering a young girl.
When Rachel dies without identifying her attacker, it looks like he is going to get away until the creator of the game locates the virtual cabin that represents where he killed the first victim on a lake that exactly matches a lake in upstate New York. When the cops find corresponding real cabin, another surprise awaits them.
The ending crosses from dramatic to melodramatic when the villain and a witness they have brought in to confront him have a bizarrely twisted encounter where he rejects the love of his life because, at thirty-five, she is too old for his tastes now and confesses that he kidnapped Rachel and planned to keep her captive and force her to play the game for the rest of her life because, "She'd never grow up in a computer."
There were some great moments of acting, such as when the young woman who first demonstrates the game for the detectives gets that glazed look in her eyes that shows she is hook on the game and oblivious to reality, the expressions on Benson and Stabler's faces when they bring the young woman in to talk to their suspect, and the bookstore assistant frantically tapping away at his keyboard, so absorbed in the game that he refuses to obey the police commands to stop and stand up. Also, the little girl in pigtails at the airport who is standing at the curb when the suspect crosses the street was a brilliant piece of visual story-telling. Unfortunately, the hectic, choppy, hurried plot and the made it tough for our favorite detectives to shine, and the overbaked emotions at the end moved this ep from a poorly written drama to a poorly written melodrama.
|
Law & Order: Special Victims Unit Alternate Avg Score: 6.67 Total Ratings: 261 Total Reviews: 24 Users who agree: 1 Users who disagree: 2 |
First, I never saw Primal Fear but in reading the synopsis, I recognized scenes from the SVU episode. That shouldn't happen. There are no original ideas, so I don't mind the writers using the same research material; but parts of this ep border on plagiarism. Shame on the writers for their laziness.
Next, I can't understand what happened to Munch's pocket handkerchief. Always before he had it when he needed it, but in this episode, it magically vanishes so he has to leave an unstable woman alone in an office full of confidential files to go off and get her a tissue. I knew right away that there would be trouble from that. Why couldn't they have written in a more believeable excuse for him to leave the room abruptly, like a confrontation out in the squadroom over the rights of the mentally ill when they become a danger to society?
Finally, I had huge problems with the law journal. How did Cass get it out of the jail? Prisons control their resources pretty tightly and Cass never should have been able to take it with her.
If we accept that Cass did somehow get the journal out of the prison, I have to wonder why the police didn't find it before taking the case to trial. Given the sisters' history, they should have been thinking conspiracy from the moment their parents were killed. That would have led them to investigate Cass and the journal should have turned up then. Finally, I have to ask myself why Cass didn't ditch this incriminating piece of media before the murder was ever committed. And for someone smart enough to pull this off, wasn't she kind of stupid to let it appear in a newspaper photograph?
I think it was sloppy writing to get to a twist ending. They could have accomplished much the same thing by having the cops think conspiracy from the moment the bodies were found. They would have taked to Cass's former cell mate who would have told them about her fascination with DID/MPD before the trial. Then there could have been a more interesting twist at the end where, maybe the MPD was real, but one of the 'sane' personalities (Janice or Dr. Young) who didn't know about the others planned the murder and the defense.
Now, I gave the ep an 8.5 despite these problems because they fianlly seem to be back in form. We had funny lines, dramatic moments, everything there should be in an SVU episode. I loved Cragen's reaction to Lake's, "It's been a pleasure working for you." I just wonder how long it will take for him to mesh. Poor guy, I actually felt sorry for him, and up til that moment, I didn't even like him. It was fun watching them harass Munch, and while I am glad that Cragen is back, I wish they had explored that shift in the relationships among the squad a little more. The interrogation of Janice/Dr. Young/Petra/etc. was fun. Benson and Stabler still work together great, and I liked the way Elliot flirted with "Dorrie", though I wonder if the signature would have stood up in court.
And I was so excited to see Elliot at home with his wife and kids where he belonged (and shirtless, yum!) Kathleen's little hissy fit was funny. I really wished I could be there to mock her. She deserves it. We also know now that Kathy is no shrinking violet and that she can keep her head in a serious crisis. I really like the way she handled herself with Dorrie. The fact that Liv was there and Kathy could see how She and Elliot worked as a team was great, too. I hope we see a lot more of the Stabler family at home this season.
|
Law & Order: Special Victims Unit Scheherezade Avg Score: 9.07 Total Ratings: 118 Total Reviews: 18 Users who agree: 1 |
I also enjoyed seeing the whole Stabler family together and talking in church. I don't care what the EO shippers say, I am hoping for a reconciliation. :-)
Brian Dennehy made a genuinely charming villain for a change, and I might be morally deficient, but by the end of the episode, I actually liked him and really didn't care about all the money he stole or the other crimes he committed. It was a good feeling to finally see a story about redemption instead of another "catch the creep and get a confession" plot.
It was delightful to see Elliot grinning when the twins were confirmed and again when he found Tierny's stash. Christopher Meloni has a beautiful smile and maybe this year he will have more reason to show it.
I am sure a reconciliation with Kathy would give Elliot plenty of reason to smile. Maybe Olivia's line, "I think Father Dennis chose you for a reason," followed not too much later by Father Dennis saying, "You'll be saving an entire family," are foreshadowing that. (An E/K shipped can dream, right?)
Potential Stabler family reunion aside, this was a great episode. My only criticisms are that I can't believe Elliot didn't know about Scheherezade and I want more of Munch, Fin, and Cragen. Hopefully, now that Olivia's back in the groove they'll get more screen time.
|
Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip The Christmas Show Avg Score: 9.59 Total Ratings: 408 Total Reviews: 38 |
Before I get into what I loved about this episode, I have a few nits to pick. I’m putting them first instead of at the end because I don’t want to leave anyone with a bad taste in his or her mouth over this wonderful ep.
Why was Jordan wearing a red tent in the beginning? I know she is pregnant, but pregnant women can still look great as we saw in the meeting with the lawyers about the FCC problems. That awful red dress made me feel like the circus was coming to town. Also, the eating for two was a lame stereotype, just as bad as if she had been puking all over the place; and Sorkin used the pretty girl interrupting the meeting for food before. Remember Ainsley Hayes in the West Wing. I have said on the forum that it’s ok for Studio 60 to resemble the West Wing, but recycling the same gimmick is just lazy an Sorkin should know better.
Jack’s language about the FCC thing bothered me. Yes, I take offense at using the Lord’s name in vain, but even if I didn’t, with the FCC discussion following immediately after, it was a blatant shot at the censors. I think having him shout, “Bastards! Those son of a b*tching bastards!” would have adequately conveyed Jack’s anger without being so obvious about Sorkin challenging network standards.
The coconut splitting the table was stupid shtick. I guess it was funny, but it was more on the order of Wyle E. Coyote or the Three Stooges than anything that pretends to be realistic. I also thought Simon and Tom’s obvious flirtation with Lucy was annoying. If Sorkin wants to work that kind of thing into the storyline, he should do it with some subtlety so the guys don’t look like idiots. At least he restrained himself from having Lucy fall for it. That would have made her just another stereotypical "dumb blonde.”
Now that I have explained why this ep doesn’t get a perfect ten, let me tell you why it deserves a 9.5.
Danny has two very telling lines in the teaser. When he tells Jordan he doesn't want to know the father of her baby, she asks why. His adamant comment, "If he was someone I wanted to know, he'd be here," shows us just how much he cares for her, but it takes her a little longer to figure it out. When the doctor confirms her pregnancy, his delighted, excited "We're having a baby?" is absolutely precious and we really want to see them become a happy little family.
Matt as the spirit of Christmas is great. Remember when he was amost afraid to take Wes's office in the beginning and then watch him breaking Wes's traditions now and you know he's really making the show his own. He has to coerce the writers a bit, but Danny's support and Cal's can-do attitude about the coconut snow shows us that everybody is getting behind him.
I loved Jack's rant about the f-word on the news and the FCC's fines. He made a good point about how the pro-family and conservative Christian groups support the war as long as they don't have to see the horrifying reality of it. Even though it's fiction, I was just as incensed as Jack about the FCC hypocrites fining the network over a single obscenity on a live news broadcast.
The way Jordan's announcement completely took the wind out of his sails was hilarious. I don't care how angry you are, you can't help being happy for a woman who's having a baby and appears to be happy about it herself. The way Jordan then urges him to "Fight 'em, Jack," takes me back to the "You've got spunk, Mary," quote from the first episode. She certainly does, and pregnant or not, she's a good one to have beside you when you're fighting the good fight.
Simon and Tom's humbugging was annoying at first, and the way they sucked the writers into it and undermined Matt’s vision was appalling; but it served a purpose. By the end of the show, I realized that sometimes the facts surrounding an event don't matter nearly as much as the way it affects people. Luke Scott, the producer who wants Harriet for his movie, is a cutie and I would like to see more of him, but not if it means watching Matt go insane. I found Matt’s comments about Luke repugnant and the abs of granite shtick lame, and I really would prefer not to see its like again. I’m finding I don’t care a whit about Matt and Harriet’s love life. The best thing that could happen with them would be for them to "just be friends." But I would like to see things heat up between Jordan and Danny.
I think I fell in love with Jack at the end of the episode when he finally speaks with Wilson White about the f-word incident. You could really see his internal struggle and his grief about the decision he had made to leave the network because he couldn’t bring himself to bow to the FCC in order to protect Wilson’s dream of a merger in China. You get a real sense of the mentor/protégé relationship they share. Wilson’s speech was quite moving, and I swear I saw Jack shed a tear. I imagine he was relieved to find that his friend supported his position and overjoyed that he wouldn’t have to be leaving. You could just see him perk up throughout the speech. I also think it was sweet the Wilson wanted him to meet his grandkids.
Danny’s confession to Jordan at the end was expected, but it was perfect. It was exactly what I wanted to see. The ‘City of New Orleans’ was poignant and poetic and served to remind those of us who have food, shelter, and most of all a family to love us, us how blessed we are.
And it all ended with the delicious irony of two Jewish funny guys wishing each other a sentimental Merry Christmas while it miraculously snows on the City of New Orleans.
That’s what makes this show so great.
|
Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip The Option Period Avg Score: 9.30 Total Ratings: 252 Total Reviews: 14 Users who agree: 2 |
In the second subplot, the fact that the show went badly and they ran out of script before the ran out of time quickly becomes a minor issue as Matt discovers that Ricky and Ron have been writing a pilot for their own series, a spinoff from their Peripheral Vision Man sketch, which we know from the pilot wasn't funny. Matt tries to talk them out of it because it is going to bomb, which will reflect badly on him and Studio 60 and leave the Ricky and Ron out of work at a time when the network is making budget cuts. When a furious and resentful Ricky is determined to go anyway, (and take most of the writing staff with him) Matt generously offers Ron some advice for improving the spinoff.
In the final subplot, Jordan comes to Danny with news about network budget cuts that will be necessary to make the deal in China go through. He must either fire fifteen people or generate added revenue through product placement (having advertisers' prodducts and brands show up in the show itself, not just in commercials.) Danny balks at the idea of firing people because Studio 60 is one of the networks best-performing shows. Since their making more money than anybody, they shouldn't have to cut their budget. He also resents the idea of product placement because Studio 60 can't very well poke fun at the establishment if they become the establishment. Just about the time Cal solves the problem of product placement for them, Matt arrives to tell them that the writing staff is leaving to work for Ricky and Ron.
The possible firing of Jordan McDeere is only briefly mentioned in the end to give us a nice cliffhanger for next week.
I missed seeing Jack Rudolph and Wilson White, but their presence was certianly felt throughout the conversation between Danny and Jordan. I also missed Jeanie and other members of the cast of the show within a show, but the great thing about this big ensemble cast is that these people can all get a look in next week while some of tonight's players take a break.
Last online Jul 20, 2008 8:53 am PT
Member since Nov 6, 2006
Profile views: 1745 (+ 3 new)
| Send Message | |
| Report Abuse | |
Stats
Rank: Autobot
Forum Posts: 2,030
|
Submissions Accepted: 57 Pending: 0 Denied: 10 Total: 67 |
Reviews Shows: 0 Episodes: 7 People: 0 Total: 7 |
Action/Adventure 8: 26.7%
Science-Fiction 7: 23.3%
Reality 1: 3.3%
Other 3: 10%
About Me
Friends
Tracked Blogs
|
OuroborosSnyder Remodel Sunday, July 20, 2008 | 0 comments |
|
|
mcrsvu im back Saturday, July 19, 2008 | 2 comments |
|
|
anorthview Batman The Dark Night Saturday, July 19, 2008 | 0 comments |
|
|
pinkydog123 Get your own COUNTDOWNS TO SVU HERE!! Thursday, July 17, 2008 | 1 comment |
|
|
smawls the US is effed. Thursday, July 17, 2008 | 1 comment |
|
|
svuiskool Hey-Ya! Sunday, July 13, 2008 | 7 comments |
|
|
hawksie Whos with me?! Thursday, July 10, 2008 | 2 comments |
|
|
ktgurl10 ahhhh oh my GOD! Monday, July 7, 2008 | 3 comments |
|
|
ITPROF4U Quiz Answers Monday, July 7, 2008 | 0 comments |
|
|
luc7ky My new addiction, her name is meiko Saturday, July 5, 2008 | 1 comment |
|
Friends' Videos
Liv feels like she lost Elliot to Dani. Will she get her man back? EO! Song is "I'm Not That Girl" and "I'm Not That Girl (reprise)" from the broadway show Wicked
My first video! Pure EO-ness to Fergie's "Big Girls Don't Cry" song
Print
Email
Comment
Tag
Digg this











