madison
CNET Networks Entertainment:
GameSpot
GameFAQs
SportsGamer
MP3.com
MovieTome
on3-and-only
Level
1
rank: Weatherman
profile views: 556
forum posts: 82
member since: Jun 27, 2007
see all »

my feed

on3-and-only: Profile

RECENT SHOW UPDATES

RECENT ACTOR UPDATES

RECENT FRIENDS' REVIEWS

  • 5.0
    loading_img
    member since: 11/08/05

    The Bottom Line: "Mediocre"

    Test test test test test test test test test test Test test test test test test test test test test Test test test test test test test test test test Test test test test test test test test test test Test test test test test test test test test test Test test test test test test test test test test Test test test test test test test test test test Test test test test test test test test test test Test test test test test test test test test test Test test test test test test test test test test Test test test test test test test test test test

    09/18/2008 3:09pm | report abuse
  • 4.0
    loading_img
    member since: 04/23/05

    The Bottom Line: "Poor"

    Sorry, but this rewrite of Serling's classic script just doesn't work. For one thing, Andrew McCarthy doesn't play his character as particularly sympathetic. Willever's character is a one-dimensional bully. The rest of the mob except for the somewhat quirky Phyllis are pretty forgettable.

    The rewrite folks seem to have forgotten that the title refers to _Monsters_. The original not only had aliens as the source of the problems, but the neighbors were paranoid about aliens. Maybe the rewriters thought in these "modern" days that aliens wouldn't have the same resonance. Maybe they just wanted to make a comment about terrorism and the War therein.

    This episode shares more with another original TZ episode: The Shelter. Like that episode, this one is non-fantastical and it has everyone turning into a jerk.

    This remake also suffers the flaw of the original Monsters... in that they somehow try to portray each neighborhood as an island totally separate from the neighboring blocks. Just hop over the backyard fence, folks.

    Overall, there seems little point in this remake. Unlike the remade Eye of the Beholder, they tried to do something different. They just didn't make much difference.

    09/17/2008 10:37pm | report abuse
  • 9.6
    loading_img
    member since: 06/17/07

    The Bottom Line: "Superb"

    David Boreanaz is an excellent actor. He has been in some of the best shows ever created. Buffy was, and is, a hit in my book and so was Angel. He has yet to let me down in Bones and just an overall great guy. I love his interviews because he is always joking around with reporter/host and he cracks me up. He is 39 years old and he looks years younger than that. He never fails to give you an superb performance and gets you into the emotions of the characters at hand. He's probably one of the only genuine and down to earth actors in Hollywood. I look forward to all his projects and hope to see him succeed in the future.

    Rating - A

    07/30/2008 1:19pm | report abuse

RECENT FRIENDS' BLOGS

  • member since: 08/27/05

    Pinning/Unpinning topics

    If you are an editor who needs episode discussion threads pinned/unpinned in your forums, please read and post in this thread.

    Posted 10/01/2008 5:20pm | views: 16,083
  • member since: 08/27/05

    GGL032 - Chuck and Heroes

    (As always, you can get the audio file from grailwolf.com, or you can click here to subscribe to the podcast via iTunes)

    Tonight I'm alone on mic (mostly) because Heather is feeling poorly. I talk about:

    1. An advance preview of the second season premiere of Chuck.
    2. Last week's premiere of Heroes
      1. TJ Aman chimes in
    3. I announce my participation in the LLS Light The Night event. If you can give, please click here.
    4. The Grailwolf's Geek Store is open, in beta. Check it out and let me know what you think. What would you like to see? (no link, to avoid inappropriate advertising on other sites, just go to the main podcast site).

    Posted 09/29/2008 8:52pm | views: 16,083
  • member since: 08/27/05

    Moderation Misunderstandings C

    If you have specific questions you don't wish to discuss publicly, feel free to PM me.

    If there's another misunderstanding topic you'd like to see, PM me directly rather than post off-topic here.

    Misunderstanding C –What about my freedom of speech?

    I'm speaking here on the basis of U.S. law. Your national standards may vary.

    First of all, many folks claim they have a "First Amendment Right" to say anything they want. That's pretty specific. The 1A says basically the government can make no law regulating your free speech. However, TV.com isn't the government, and it doesn't make law.

    "Freedom of Speech" is a bit trickier. The UN, for instance, has stated that humans have a fundamental right to free speech.

    On the other hand, try going into the UN and asking to speak to the delegates, and claim that your right to free speech lets you do it. Even the most liberal Supreme Courts in U.S. history never let just anyone wander in to their courtroom and say anything they want, any time they want.

    So "freedom of speech" can be regulated on public property. What about private property? On private property, owners' rights trump "freedom of speech." Why? Because you can always go somewhere else, including your own private property. No one can stop you from talking: however, they can stop you from talking on their property.

    On TV.com, you can't start up your own threads on someone else's blog. You can't go into, say, The Mentalist forum and post a hundred Spongebob threads.

    TV.com is private property. They invite guests in, they have them sign the Terms of Service, people agree to abide by it. If you don't follow those rules, TV.com can kick you out.

    It's no different then if someone invites you into their house and you start saying stuff they don't like. They're not obliged to let you stay in their house and listen to you. And you can't force them to let you stay claiming "freedom of speech."

    So, yes, on TV.com you can't say anything you want, any time and any place you want. The same reason that on your private property, people can't come in and say anything you want, any time and any place they want.

    There is a heck of lot that you can say on TV.com, in the proper forum. And even more on your blogs. But even that isn't unlimited.

    Anybody who believes in total, unfettered freedom of speech, well, great, I can respect that. Since you feel that way...

    Please provide me with your address and house keys so I can come in and talk to you any time you want. Give me your calling card number so I can talk to anybody I want to, any time I want. Send me $100: I have some pamphlets I need to post around town. If you have a web site, give me the passwords and accesses so I can post what I want there, when I want it.

    And if you don't do all of this, you're against freedom of speech.

    Private citizens and companies aren't required to finance your freedom of speech or provide you with a soapbox. And if they do choose to give you a soapbox, they're allowed to set rules and regulations on when and how you can use that soapbox. That's what TV.com does, that's what most sites do in one form or another.

    As far as TV.com, the standards are pretty simple: be nice to each other, be considerate, stay on-topic, and don't do anything illegal.

    Posted 09/26/2008 3:14pm | views: 16,083
advertisement